No.
How about you summarize the rest, since there seems to be something objectionable preventing it's being posted in full.
You don’t vote for the VP, Jimbo.
Bumping for later. I like reading politijim. Thanks for the post.
He is eligible. Just saying he isn’t over and over changes nothing.
Thank you.
Sue the people who put him on the ballot.
They will be violating your right to a constitutional government.
Romney-the-Backstabbing RINO is NOT a conservative
substitute for Obama-the-Undocumented-Tyrant in any way.
NO RINOs. Mr. RomneyCARE will NOT get conservatives’ votes.
What a pile of condescending crap! I will be sure to avoid anything that you post here again.
The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed.
I have emphasized the word “little” because the truth of the law on this issue is very simple, folks. So simple that the mystery is deciphered by application of one of the most clear, concise and undeniable rules of law; the code of statutory construction governs, and therefore, “natural born Citizen” must require something more than being born in the United States.
Let me put it to you in appropriately simple language:
Clause A = “Only a natural born Citizen may be President.”
Clause B = “Anyone born in the United States is a Citizen.”
(While these two clauses reflect Article 2, Section 1, and the 14th Amendment, I shall refer to them as “Clause A” and “Clause B” for now.)
The code of statutory construction is learned by every student in law school, and every practicing attorney has confronted it. Every judge is required to apply the rule equally to all statutes, and the Constitution. There is no wiggle room at all. The rule states that when a court examines two clauses, unless Congress has made it clear that one clause repeals the other, the court must observe a separate legal effect for each. More specifically, regardless of the chronology of enactment, the general clause can never govern the specific.
Clause B is a general rule of citizenship, which states that all persons born in the country are members of the nation.
Clause A is a specific clause that says only those members of the nation who are “natural born” may be President.
According to the rule of statutory construction, the court must determine that Clause A requires something more than Clause B.
It’s truly that simple. ...
and also see:
AMICUS BRIEF – Georgia POTUS Eligibility Cases.
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/amicus-brief-georgia-potus-eligibility-cases/
Not this crap again.
I will.
Thank you dear comrade.
-Sincerely,
Chairman Obama.
So who really cares...it’s just another vote for OBozo.
Until the Supreme Court rules specifically on the question of natural born citizen as it applies to eligibility to hold the office of president, there will be disagreement among very smart constitutional people as to the meaning.
It is true that somebody with US Citizen parents is considered to be natural born, but nothing I’ve read tells me that’s the only criteria. There are other cases that show a person born in the United States to be “natural born” regardless of the citizenship of their parents.
For now, thanks to Obama’s election, the standard is “born in the USA”. Until the court rules otherwise, I will vote for a Romney/Rubio ticket.
He was born to two parents legally in America. I agree with Mark Levin that Marco is eligible. In fact, I will think Romney politically stupid if he chooses someone else. Rubio will actually excite the base more than Romney ever could.
Calm down. Rubio is not going to be selected for VP. Portman or TPaw will be the running mate. But I hear ya. I won’t vote for Rubio either.