Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/23/2012 3:07:19 PM PDT by rightjb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: rightjb
(Excerpt) Read more at politijim.com ...

No.

How about you summarize the rest, since there seems to be something objectionable preventing it's being posted in full.

2 posted on 06/23/2012 3:10:07 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

You don’t vote for the VP, Jimbo.


3 posted on 06/23/2012 3:12:31 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

Bumping for later. I like reading politijim. Thanks for the post.


4 posted on 06/23/2012 3:13:10 PM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic ( (#withNewt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

5 posted on 06/23/2012 3:14:23 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Guns Walked -- People Died -- Holder Lied -- Obama Golfed (thanks, Secret Agent Man))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

He is eligible. Just saying he isn’t over and over changes nothing.


6 posted on 06/23/2012 3:15:20 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

Thank you.


7 posted on 06/23/2012 3:15:25 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb
I call you a suicidal, self-destructive Obama supporter.
9 posted on 06/23/2012 3:15:53 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

12 posted on 06/23/2012 3:18:57 PM PDT by CodeToad (Homosexuals are homophobes. They insist on being called 'gay' instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

14 posted on 06/23/2012 3:19:33 PM PDT by CodeToad (Homosexuals are homophobes. They insist on being called 'gay' instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

Sue the people who put him on the ballot.

They will be violating your right to a constitutional government.


15 posted on 06/23/2012 3:20:12 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

Romney-the-Backstabbing RINO is NOT a conservative
substitute for Obama-the-Undocumented-Tyrant in any way.

NO RINOs. Mr. RomneyCARE will NOT get conservatives’ votes.


16 posted on 06/23/2012 3:20:27 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb
If you consider yourself a conservative – let me advise you that you can’t buy back your integrity when it’s convenient.

What a pile of condescending crap! I will be sure to avoid anything that you post here again.

20 posted on 06/23/2012 3:29:55 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed.

I have emphasized the word “little” because the truth of the law on this issue is very simple, folks. So simple that the mystery is deciphered by application of one of the most clear, concise and undeniable rules of law; the code of statutory construction governs, and therefore, “natural born Citizen” must require something more than being born in the United States.

Let me put it to you in appropriately simple language:

Clause A = “Only a natural born Citizen may be President.”

Clause B = “Anyone born in the United States is a Citizen.”

(While these two clauses reflect Article 2, Section 1, and the 14th Amendment, I shall refer to them as “Clause A” and “Clause B” for now.)

The code of statutory construction is learned by every student in law school, and every practicing attorney has confronted it. Every judge is required to apply the rule equally to all statutes, and the Constitution. There is no wiggle room at all. The rule states that when a court examines two clauses, unless Congress has made it clear that one clause repeals the other, the court must observe a separate legal effect for each. More specifically, regardless of the chronology of enactment, the general clause can never govern the specific.

Clause B is a general rule of citizenship, which states that all persons born in the country are members of the nation.

Clause A is a specific clause that says only those members of the nation who are “natural born” may be President.

According to the rule of statutory construction, the court must determine that Clause A requires something more than Clause B.

It’s truly that simple. ...

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/27/the-dirty-little-secret-of-the-natural-born-citizen-clause-revealed/

and also see:

AMICUS BRIEF – Georgia POTUS Eligibility Cases.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/amicus-brief-georgia-potus-eligibility-cases/


21 posted on 06/23/2012 3:30:00 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

Not this crap again.


23 posted on 06/23/2012 3:30:41 PM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

I will.


29 posted on 06/23/2012 3:37:08 PM PDT by Poser (Cogito ergo Spam - I think, therefore I ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

Thank you dear comrade.

-Sincerely,

Chairman Obama.


31 posted on 06/23/2012 3:38:50 PM PDT by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

So who really cares...it’s just another vote for OBozo.


33 posted on 06/23/2012 3:44:14 PM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

Until the Supreme Court rules specifically on the question of natural born citizen as it applies to eligibility to hold the office of president, there will be disagreement among very smart constitutional people as to the meaning.

It is true that somebody with US Citizen parents is considered to be natural born, but nothing I’ve read tells me that’s the only criteria. There are other cases that show a person born in the United States to be “natural born” regardless of the citizenship of their parents.

For now, thanks to Obama’s election, the standard is “born in the USA”. Until the court rules otherwise, I will vote for a Romney/Rubio ticket.


36 posted on 06/23/2012 3:47:33 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Running in circles and screaming is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

He was born to two parents legally in America. I agree with Mark Levin that Marco is eligible. In fact, I will think Romney politically stupid if he chooses someone else. Rubio will actually excite the base more than Romney ever could.


39 posted on 06/23/2012 3:53:49 PM PDT by alstewartfan ("Bedroom eyes and boardroom faces---Oh where will it lead?" from Red Toupee by Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rightjb

Calm down. Rubio is not going to be selected for VP. Portman or TPaw will be the running mate. But I hear ya. I won’t vote for Rubio either.


42 posted on 06/23/2012 3:58:56 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson