I can see your points and I have considered them. It all looks so suspicious and I have come to the conclusion that it’s no accident they all look suspicious. It’s purposeful sleight of hand.
Remember the FBI files - how that was pinned on some exuberant low level staffer? Remember the Rose Law firm billing records that were unexpectedly found in the WH map room after - how that was pinned on some low level clerical person? Then the Lewinsky matter - how many crimes were committed in that whole mess, yet the Clintons emerged stronger than ever. We all thought those were actions that would bring the Clintons down, but they didn’t.
There would be layers and layers of people/papers/e-files to sift through before the person or persons responsible for the tampering would be identified. These people are pros at obfuscation and misdirection. Obama and his closest advisors would have six, if not more, degrees of separation from the perpetrators.
I would love if someone found a smoking gun and I would be proved totally wrong in my conclusions. But how many times during the Clinton era was the phrase, “smoking gun” uttered or written and it ended up being a toy water pistol, if that.
You’re claiming that the CLINTONS made all this look suspicious (by having the HDOH change BC#’s, their database, the 1960-64 birth index, etc, having Selective Service forge a draft registration, putting all the Kenya claims out there including in Obama’s own biography in 1991, having Obama’s passport file breached 3 times, having Kenyan officials claim in a radio interview that they are going to memorialize his birthplace in Kenya, having Obama himself use on his tax return a SSN that fails e-verify and was issued from Connecticut, having Abercrombie tell Mike Evans that he went to the hospitals with a search warrant and couldn’t find any birth records and that he had never even seen Obama in Hawaii until T-ball age, etc ad nauseum)...and yet wouldn’t ever come out and seal the deal by using all these suspicious things they created?
That doesn’t make sense. Even if they had had the ability to effect all this suspicious stuff, some of it long before they know Obama would be a threat to them - why would they not have used any of this in the 2008 primary? Why did Hillary move at the DNC Convention that they unanimously nominate Obama?
If Clintons were able to get the HDOH to do all this suspicious activity in order to make Obama look illegitimate, then why didn’t the HDOH just come right out and say Obama wasn’t born there? Everything the HDOH has done has consistently covered Obama’s behind. You think the Clintons are behind that? For what purpose?
That just doesn’t make sense.
Bill Gwatney is dead. His killer had no dealings with him, no reason to target him. He can’t be questioned because the cops shot him. His wife supported Obama rather than Clinton at the DNC Convention just a couple weeks after her husband died. Those are easily-verified facts.
Now we’ve got the Hillary supporters saying - and apparently to a law enforcement body, even - that shortly before he was killed Gwatney had agreed to present a petition challenging Obama at the DNC Convention. We know from public reports to “Recreate ‘68” that the community organization wing of the dems were prepared to do violence if they thought it necessary in Denver; who is the darling of the community organization wing, and why were they thinking that might be necessary?
All that stuff makes sense if the Clintons intended to out Obama’s ineligibility but didn’t because they were threatened by the murders of Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs. Murders which wouldn’t be necessary if the Clintons didn’t actually have the goods on Obama - something they couldn’t have if Obama had a genuine HI BC, passport, SSN, and draft registration.
This explanation makes sense - what we saw in front of our faces then and now makes sense - if Obama lacked all those records and the Soros/Obama machinery threatened multiple government agencies into covering for Obama, and Clintons were threatened out of using Obama’s ineligibility for their own personal gain.
What explanation do you have, that makes sense out of all this stuff?