You’re claiming that the CLINTONS made all this look suspicious (by having the HDOH change BC#’s, their database, the 1960-64 birth index, etc, having Selective Service forge a draft registration, putting all the Kenya claims out there including in Obama’s own biography in 1991, having Obama’s passport file breached 3 times, having Kenyan officials claim in a radio interview that they are going to memorialize his birthplace in Kenya, having Obama himself use on his tax return a SSN that fails e-verify and was issued from Connecticut, having Abercrombie tell Mike Evans that he went to the hospitals with a search warrant and couldn’t find any birth records and that he had never even seen Obama in Hawaii until T-ball age, etc ad nauseum)...and yet wouldn’t ever come out and seal the deal by using all these suspicious things they created?
That doesn’t make sense. Even if they had had the ability to effect all this suspicious stuff, some of it long before they know Obama would be a threat to them - why would they not have used any of this in the 2008 primary? Why did Hillary move at the DNC Convention that they unanimously nominate Obama?
If Clintons were able to get the HDOH to do all this suspicious activity in order to make Obama look illegitimate, then why didn’t the HDOH just come right out and say Obama wasn’t born there? Everything the HDOH has done has consistently covered Obama’s behind. You think the Clintons are behind that? For what purpose?
That just doesn’t make sense.
Bill Gwatney is dead. His killer had no dealings with him, no reason to target him. He can’t be questioned because the cops shot him. His wife supported Obama rather than Clinton at the DNC Convention just a couple weeks after her husband died. Those are easily-verified facts.
Now we’ve got the Hillary supporters saying - and apparently to a law enforcement body, even - that shortly before he was killed Gwatney had agreed to present a petition challenging Obama at the DNC Convention. We know from public reports to “Recreate ‘68” that the community organization wing of the dems were prepared to do violence if they thought it necessary in Denver; who is the darling of the community organization wing, and why were they thinking that might be necessary?
All that stuff makes sense if the Clintons intended to out Obama’s ineligibility but didn’t because they were threatened by the murders of Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs. Murders which wouldn’t be necessary if the Clintons didn’t actually have the goods on Obama - something they couldn’t have if Obama had a genuine HI BC, passport, SSN, and draft registration.
This explanation makes sense - what we saw in front of our faces then and now makes sense - if Obama lacked all those records and the Soros/Obama machinery threatened multiple government agencies into covering for Obama, and Clintons were threatened out of using Obama’s ineligibility for their own personal gain.
What explanation do you have, that makes sense out of all this stuff?
Sorry, I didn’t make myself clear. I don’t think the Clintons were behind any of the Obama shenanigans.
I was just trying to draw a parallel between all the so-called smoking guns that were going to bring the Clintons to ruin which ended up being duds and the many smoking guns that are going to bring down Obama.
I firmly believe the Clintons purposefully left the bread crumbs out there for people to sniff along that always led to dead ends. They were always feeding crap to the NY Times to get people all in a lather, then fizzle, fizzle, fizzle.
My point is that I believe the Obama team is using the same tactics and deriving great sport from it.