Two points:
First, no one gets to post a vanity to FR with instructions on who may and may not respond.
Second, in a two party system any failure to vote for the least offensive candidate is mathematically equivalent to half a vote for the most offensive candidate. By refusing to vote for Mitt Romney (as is your right) you will have essentially voted for Barak Obama.
========================================================
While you are mathematically correct, my point is my vote is accountable to The One who created math, and is beyond math.
If 1 = sin and 2 = sin I cannot vote for 1 or 2 without sinning so I must vote for 3.
From a worldly standpoint 3 = 1, but from a spiritual standpoint 3 = 3.
“By refusing to vote for Mitt Romney (as is your right) you will have essentially voted for Barak Obama.”
... not so much.
“Second, in a two party system any failure to vote for the least offensive candidate is mathematically equivalent to half a vote for the most offensive candidate. By refusing to vote for Mitt Romney (as is your right) you will have essentially voted for Barak Obama.”
So lets see here. By refusing to vote for Obama then you have essentially already voted for Mitt Romney. That is according to your kind of math.
We either have a DNC sleeper rising up to commit blasphemy (sounds like a leftist strategy to call voting against Barry a sin), or someone who has invested a lot of time and money in preparing for the collapse of the Republic and longs for the chaos to apply its preparations. Either way it’s a shameful thread and not at all Christian, though it does fit the mold of the ‘Westboro Church’ dupes.