Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
"two party system any failure to vote for the least offensive candidate is mathematically equivalent to half a vote for the most offensive candidate. By refusing to vote for Mitt Romney (as is your right) you will have essentially voted for Barak Obama."

========================================================

While you are mathematically correct, my point is my vote is accountable to The One who created math, and is beyond math.

If 1 = sin and 2 = sin I cannot vote for 1 or 2 without sinning so I must vote for 3.

From a worldly standpoint 3 = 1, but from a spiritual standpoint 3 = 3.

26 posted on 05/11/2012 6:38:34 PM PDT by Manic_Episode (Politics is fake. I think it's owned by Vince Mcmahon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Manic_Episode; af_vet_rr
Just so we're clear: Killing a defenseless Adolph Hitler is still a sin, right?

Lying to your grandmother that your grandfather never cheated on her is still a sin, right?

40 posted on 05/11/2012 6:56:45 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Manic_Episode

If you want to vote for a sinless candidate you are about 2000 years late. I’ve got bad news for you, if you ever step into a voting booth again, you will be voting for a sinner.

If you give up voting for sinners, maybe you should also give up eating, as you are supporting sinners with your money. Seriously, hold your nose and vote for the candidate that will cause less harm.


115 posted on 05/11/2012 9:27:59 PM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson