Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This guy looks easier to beat than as the weeks pass.
1 posted on 05/10/2012 10:23:36 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jmaroneps37

2 posted on 05/10/2012 10:25:57 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Mr. Obama’s record in high office looks like a game of Twister.

You know, I don’t know if this chap really knows who he is.

Accordingly, if you don’t know who you are, you do some fairly stupid and rash things.

Tsk,tsk, Mr. President.


3 posted on 05/10/2012 10:27:02 AM PDT by RexBeach (Mr. Obama Can't Count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

The problem is that the man has no core.

This allowed him to win in 2008 - he ran as a uniting republican with a (D) next to his name.

Now he is a scrambling candidate that will do anything to gain traction away from his record. We Americans have lived through 3 years of pain. Even Reagan only took 2 years to turn around Carter’s damage.


5 posted on 05/10/2012 10:30:12 AM PDT by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
The huge 61/39 landslide loss Gay “marriage” took in North Carolina apparently set off a panic in Obama’s camp that “demanded” action.

This brought about Obama’s tense “declaration” of support for Gay “marriage” something that directly contradicts what he said about the issue in 2008

Uhm...didn't Obama declare support for gay marriage BEFORE the landslide victory against gay marriage?

6 posted on 05/10/2012 10:36:31 AM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
The problem with the media constantly pounding the drum is that the hearer begins to believe his own propaganda. Happens quite a lot, actually, which is why the Beltway/NY media axis has been called an echo chamber.

OTOH, this only hurts 0bama if Romney takes a contrary position. If not, he skates. And that may be behind this move at this particular time.

7 posted on 05/10/2012 10:36:42 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
"but among Blacks it was a lopsided
28/62 against the Gay position."
looks like we're all getting "screwed"; that's O'Bozo's real position.

8 posted on 05/10/2012 10:39:12 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA. DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; different flie$". :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Someone texted to a Boston talkradio show that this means Obama will lose. The swing states, South etc will opt for
Romney (either by voting for him, staying home, etc.)

In NC blacks voted 2-1 to dump gay marriage.


11 posted on 05/10/2012 10:54:08 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Let’s do the math.

Does anyone seriously believe that those who favor gay marriage weren’t already planning on pulling the lever for Obama?

Among the young, definitely the targeted audience of this announcement, I’m pretty sure the pivotal issue for then will be economic. I look for this particular cohort to (statistically, in comparison to 2008) stay home in 2012. And this announcement by Obama doesn’t change my prediction much at all.

Blacks and Hispanics are nearly monolithic in their opposition to gay marriage. A large number of Hispanic Catholics, who may have voted for Obama, will now be unwilling to ditch their religious beliefs and vote for this guy. I know, I was married to one.

Then there are evangelicals, devout Catholics in general, and the moderately religious, for whom Obama’s gay marriage flop may be a trigger to action, so there should be a loss of votes here too.

In sum, I see this announcement as detrimental to Obama’s reelection.


12 posted on 05/10/2012 10:56:34 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Obama just lost the opportunity to use the flip-flop argument against Romney.


13 posted on 05/10/2012 11:02:55 AM PDT by PBinTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Normally after a vote like the one in North Carolina, homosexuals--with assistance from the MSM--would be calling for a nationwide boycott of North Carolina.

Will be interesting to see how that plays out.

14 posted on 05/10/2012 11:03:57 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

He was cornered. A large chunk of his campaign money is coming from the gay lobby, and they were threatening to walk. He’s more likely to lose now than before, but without that money and the support (from Hollywood and media propaganda, not to mention “ground troops” for GOTV) he’d have no chance at all.


17 posted on 05/10/2012 11:35:16 AM PDT by kevkrom (Those in a rush to trample the Constitution seem to forget that it is the source of their authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Obama will not lose many votes from Blacks over his support of gay marriage. Look what happened in California. People are not consistent in the way they vote. Otherwise no pro-abortion or pro-gay-marriage would never be elected. Yet, in reality, they are elected.


18 posted on 05/10/2012 11:53:22 AM PDT by paudio (no tagline for now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson