Apparently the GOP response is to shout down anyone who asks such questions.
Seems pretty cowardly to me.
Ping
You miss a huge factor: Obama’s supporters versus Romney’s supporters. We don’t have Kings who rule by edict. Obamas pro gay stances are far more dangerous than Mitts - simply because the majority of Obama’s supporters will gleefully push that agenda.
This is not to excuse Romney - that’s not the point. The point is how malignantly dangerous to our society the two sides are. One if far more malignant than the other, even if they are both equally un pure. Which they are.
FUBO X whateverthedeficitnumberis.
Did it ever?
Obviously Romney would only be slightly better than Urkel as President but our focus and energy would be better spent making sure as many Tea Partiers as possible get elected to Congress to minimize the harm a President Romney (gag!) or President Obama (puke!) can inflict on humanity.
So, does this finish his waffle?
What is the next ‘hot’ topic of discussion to keep the public distracted from the main issue facing us all, THE ECONOMY!
The RAT game plan is to ATTACK ROMNEY for anything that will stick, so it can help their socialist candidate.
The continuation of criticism against Romney is nothing more than promoting the RAT game plan.
On the other hand. Pressuring Romney to STICK TO CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES is another thing.
So, anytime I see continuing CRITICISM of Romney, I see it as nothing more than taking aim to shoot down our chances of defeating Obama. That is the work of the RATs! and I view that with great suspicion now.
On the other hand, promoting positive conservative positions for Romney to maintain is another!
Larry Kudlow was interviewed this morning on Chicago WLS radio and he said that this is just another diversion by Obama to flee questions about the economy and loss of millions of jobs which is what American are really concerned about.
Kudlow said that it is also a trap set by Obama for Romney to fall into by getting off message about the economy.
http://www.creators.com/opinion/lawrence-kudlow.html
http://www.wlsam.com/Article.asp?id=2453166&spid=
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Seems like Romney has already given his response.
-------------------------------------------------------
His record in liberal MA could have been a lot better but:
"Romney was a leading voice against gay marriage as Massachusetts governor. The courts legalized gay marriage in the state during his tenure, but he supported a constitutional amendment to define marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
After gay marriage became legal, Romney sought to enforce a statute banning state officials from marrying gay couples from other states. In a speech to conservatives last winter, Romney touted that move, saying he prevented Massachusetts from becoming the "Las Vegas of gay marriage."
----------------------------------------------------
Sure, he did a lot of bad things as well, but our choice is Romney or Obama. Which is it going to be?
Less than 2% if that many are queer. Why are we talking about this? Because Obama has nothing else.
Mark my words, Obama will not only lose but he will lose by huge numbers. Numbers so large that no amount of fraud will overcome it.
Did anyone catch Shep Smith’s glib descriptions of anyone who opposes Gay Marriage in questions yesterday to Brett Baher and the WH Correspondent? He phrased his questions with sarcasm to sound like anyone who opposes Gay Marriage doesn’t live in this century. I am beginning to think Shep is Gay himself.
If you saw the neighbor boy trying to mate with a knothole or his cat, you’d yell at him and think he should be in an institution. Yet, if a man attempts to mate with another man’s anal canal, or a woman attempts to mate with an electrified rubber appliance, that’s OK? They are as insane as the kid trying to mate with a knothole.
GOP response should be: “no hungry children have been fed by the recent focus on same sex marriage. President Obama continues to fail on the economy.”
I think it would be best if the GOP not lie, so that would rule out both of your suggestions.
Virgil Goode: On the Issues
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR1WxNWkSMo
It is becoming apparent that the DNC (with the help of the media) are going to keep throwing this crap out to keep the discussion everywhere but where it should be: the economy.
Of course its asking a lot for a party stupid enough to nominate Romney to figure this out.