I’m sure Breitbart did die of a heart attack. But the only way we’d know if it was a naturally-occurring one rather than induced by a heart attack gun is by knowing whether there was a tiny pin-prick red spot where a dart went into his body.
And the guy who very likely photographed Breitbart’s body for the coroner was the very guy who was killed under suspicious circumstances (according to the ER personnel and the cops) - just in time to clear the way for those photos to be altered before the final autopsy results were due to be out a week later.
What you don’t seem to grasp is that assassinations are designed to be unprovable. But as multiple critically-timed unespected deaths by critical people start to pile up.... it stretches credulity to believe them ALL to be coincidence.
Especially when the desired effect is always reached: silence from the people who have the power to expose Obama/Soros. Why do YOU say these people are keeping absolutely quiet?
Did you really believe Ben Shapiro when he told Mark Gillar that Breitbart wasn’t going to address probable cause for forgery and fraud involving Obama’s BC and draft registration because those 2 federal felonies weren’t significant enough to waste time on?
Why do you think Sean Hannity said he would vet Obama whatever the cost (what cost did he think there would be) and then scheduled Mike Zullo of Arpaio’s posse to be on his show? And why do you think Fox canceled Mike’s appearance at the last minute?
Why do you think Rush Limbaugh had a bomb scare the same day as Arpaio’s presser?
If we were talking about technology/capabilities that probably don’t exist or situations where there was one sudden unexplained death I could possibly buy your point. But we’re talking about a pattern of behavior regarding Obama’s eligibility where there are so many known threats and so many suspiciously-timed “unexpected” deaths that only a fool could ignore the pattern the dots make altogether.
The toxicology tests showed no prescription drugs in his body. The coroner’s office had said very early on that Breitbart hadn’t been seen by a doctor for over a year. That doesn’t match the stories Breitbart’s friends came out with - including that he had been in the hospital for a couple weeks within the past year because of a heart attack. The statements by the coroner’s office strongly suggest that those were complete fabrications. Why are these people fabricating these stories, according to you?
And the guy who very likely photographed Breitbart’s body for the coroner was the very guy who was killed under suspicious circumstances ...
***
We don’t know that the employee was killed. He died, but the cause and manner of death have not been established.
One thing to remember is that journalism these days is sloppy. Look at the reported cause of Mr. Breitbart’s death. Heart failure. My guess is the reporter saw those words on the report or heard the coroner mention them and just wrote down heart failure as the cause of death. Whatever...careless reporting incites all sorts of problems. A poor choice of words causes chaos. Is it deliberate? Maybe, maybe not. But when we rely on this sloppy reporting, it leads us to draw a number of erroneous conclusions. And we focus on a manufactured issue, while ignoring so many other, real issues.