No, you’ve totally reversed what I was saying. I’m saying that he WOULD have a normal-looking BC if he was adopted or reported as a home birth by his Grandma.
The only instance where he wouldn’t is if mother and baby were not examined by a Hawaii doctor within the first month or two after the birth. And that is a whole ‘nother problem that has nothing to do with his adoption or parentage but with the credibility of the claim of a Hawaii birth. That credibility problem doesn’t go away just by him being adopted and having paperwork that claims different PARENTS for him.
Something people need to absorb: Obama is using a stolen BC# - almost certainly Virginia Sunahara’s, since her birth and death situation (including a misreported name on the death certificate) is a very, very rare combination in which there could be a legitimate discrepancy between the “date filed” and the out-of-sequence BC#. There would be no need for him to do that if he had a HI BC that originated in 1961 - regardless of how many adoptions he went through. An adoption would not require the HDOH to give Obama the BC# of Virginia Sunahara.
I have heard this repeatedly alleged. Do we now have proof that this is true? (That Obama's birth certificate number is the same as Virginia Sunahara.)