Hate to stir things up, but, why is it common for prominent black men to have white wives, but not the reverse?? If we’re talking about perceived superior mates and all that, do we really want to go there, talking about how people choose mates????????
EEEVVVIIILLLution!
Evolution is inherently racist. There is only one race - the human race.
That is an amazing article. Thanks.
Evolution’s message to us all is: you’re probably worthless.
God’s message is: “For God so loved the world He gave his only begotten Son...”
Peacock is code language for black woman? News to me.
This whole piece is so stupid I urge you to ask the mods to remove it.
The lady is clearly having a psychotic event.
Working and making money is a method of staying alive, it shouldn’t become the reason for living.
Likewise, natural selection is a method for nature to develop “better” creatures, but developing “better” creatures shouldn’t become our conscious goal.
That’s called “Eugenics” and brought us Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Planned Parenthood.
I thought the “rule” was mainly for men, and Thackeray’s rule applies to females: “A woman with fair opportunities, and without an absolute hump, may marry whom she likes.”
Hey, maybe she was confusing it with capitalism!
Have you lost your mind?
Evolution exists, like the law of gravity. And just like the law of gravity, you can't apply it as the cause of everything. But it does exist.
Selective breeding is a good example, whether in animals, plants, or humans - some traits are preserved and extended, some traits are not. These are facts. It doesn't mean you have to believe there's no Creator. You just have to apply things properly.
"Hating" a law of nature, a fact seen a billion times a day around us, is idiotic.
And BTW, the woman in the video was obviously mentally deranged before evolution ever got into the picture. She seemed just as likely to go off because of the color the walls were painted, as evolution. Get a grip.
The problem isn't evolution. The problen is stupid people.
For what it's worth, when Darwin wrote this the word "race" had not yet acquired many of its present day connotation. Nazism, eugenics, etc. were all in the future.
"Race" at the time meant roughly the same as "species," and it was used for plants and animals as well as people. Considering how much he wrote, there is surprisingly little evidence Darwin was racist, even by today's standards. He probably accepted the conventional wisdom (believed scientific) of his day that some groups of humans were inherently superior to other groups. But since he wrote so little about it, it obviously wasn't a big issue for him.
"....Darwinists specifically do not believe in evolution, being that they reject its very possibility (i.e., directional change into an intrinsically higher state). Rather, they believe in change, a very different thing. In this regard, they are very much like progressives, who also believe in change, but not genuine progress, since their metaphysic abolishes any absolute standard by which real progress can be measured. ..."
Soooo Christian men don't look at looks or other charactericts when choosing a mate?
Suuuuurrrrre!!!
This article is just stupid
This might not have been as spontaneous as it is portrayed to be.
The left has been turning against Darwin and his buddy, who came up with the survival of the fittest theory for quite a while. it just doesn’t fit with the endangered species act and the socialist nanny state.
As this woman points out, it’s also in conflict with post modernist progressivism, which holds that all history is nothing but a work of fiction, a meta narrative, designed to oppress the brown people and prop up the Western White Male.
Barack Obama has even mentioned this theme in speeches, saying that our country was not founded on survival of the fittest. (little bit of cognitive dissonance there).
Evolution also implies that the black race is inferior to the white race because blacks are one evolutionary step closer to the primate class.
...just another episode of.
Black Girls Gone Wild !!