Cheers!
Cheers!
Excellent question. And, at least Newt married them.
If she can’t afford $10.00/mo birth control pills, how can she afford law school??? Hmmm??? Libs need to get a life..
2nd, why are you changing the subject. This debate is about 1st Amendment freedoms. Attacking Sandra Fluke for her sex life is changing the subject, and won't help. Besides, She is probably a plant. Who knows if she even has ever had sex. She's probably a woman's studies major, who made the whole think up to support Obamacare. Don't take the bait.
Rush mentioned Fluke got a call of encouragement from Obama today. In my email to Rush (I can never get thru on the phone - it’s always busy), I suggested Fluke should be mad at Pelosi and Obama. They were the ones that made the age too low so she can sponge off her parents policy.
Easy. Because Newt’s conservative, a man and pro-life while Sandra’s a lib, a woman and a pro-abort.
Let the bipartisan feminist/romanticist paradigm run its course. It’s about to meet its consequences. Avoid buying anything that you don’t really need. Become more self-sufficient each month (energy, food, repairs, etc.). Starve the B. Be nonpolitical until then in order to avoid interfering with her momentum toward the edge.
... as well as a tool who is used to decide and direct the political conversation to the exclusion of all else.
Predictable people are easily manipulated.
Rush and Santorum are predictable.
Godspeed Newt Gingrich.
“hey, buy me condoms or I will knock up your daughters. I am a love em and leave em kind of guy, and I have a RIGHT to my lifestyle, free of charge. YOU MUST PAY FOR MY SEXUAL PLEASURE!”
See how far that goes!
Easy cheesy, one is running for President, the other is not.
But if she were running for POTUS as a dem, she would be a hero.
There are no real heros here.