The marriage date on this document of March 5, 1964 PREDATES THE DIVORCE which was granted MARCH 20.
Posted on 03/01/2012 1:50:50 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
I just finished Watching Sheriff Arpaio's press conference. The Sheriff's posse has concluded that the document was created on a computer and is therefore a forgery.
I will once again point out that if Obama was adopted, he would get a replacement birth certificate that will be designed to look like an original 1961 birth certificate, but it will in fact have been created by the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii at the Direction of an Hawaiian State Judge.
"The Obama was Adopted" theory addresses the "forgery" issue head on, and precludes it from being a crime. In my opinion, this is the simplest explanation for the fact that Obama's document looks cobbled together, and that Hawaii is tacitly confirming it as legitimate.
I will further add, (for those who have not already been so informed) that *I* was adopted, and *I* have a birth certificate which was created six years after I was born, and is in fact a replacement birth certificate that lists my new last name, new parent's names, etc.
This theory ties up a lot of the loose ends neatly (not all of them) and it doesn't involve believing that the Hawaiian government is involved in a criminal "conspiracy." I urge people to consider this idea before jumping to the conclusion that everyone involved with producing this document has committed a criminal act.
This “typical white person” certinly remembers that little tidbit.
The marriage date on this document of March 5, 1964 PREDATES THE DIVORCE which was granted MARCH 20.
Understand that State Department "documents" of that period which claim otherwise...are mistaken.
Once again: a minor child cannot renounce his right to birthright U.S. citizenship. State Department "documents" not withstanding.
Don't bother. I'm done with the discussion.
Another flashback, from one of his books (written by someone else of course) said something like “just smile at the white folks and speak politely so you don’t scare them.”
Don't bother. You're wrong.
The only reason to be uncertain is if you are an illiterate. The State Department documents clearly state why you would write someone's name there and cross through it. It is because that person has forsworn his American nationality and naturalized as a foreigner.
From the article:
"Hawaii registered births as occurring in Hawaii which did not actually occur in Hawaii and then reported them as native birth statistics to the federal government in order to inflate its statistics triggering federal funding for public services."
Hawaii official now swears:
No Obama birth certificate
Signs affidavit declaring long-form, hospital-generated document absent
Published: 01/24/2011 at 8:48 PM - ( Note Date )
by Jerome R. Corsi
Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.
[snip]
“During the course of my employment,” Adams swears in the affidavit (viewable in full as part 1 and part 2), “I became aware that many requests were being made to the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division, the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the Hawaii Department of Health from around the country to obtain a copy of then-Senator Barack Obama’s long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate.”
As he inquired about the birth certificate, he says, his supervisors told him that the records were not on file at the Hawaii Department of Health.
“Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health,” Adams’ affidavit reads, “and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government.”
In a recorded telephone interview, Adams told WND that it was common knowledge among election officials where he worked that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate could be found at the Hawaii Department of Health.
http://www.wnd.com/2011/01/254401/
WHO IS 0BAMA?
—NO CLASSMATES KNOW HIM:
Not one person has stepped up and said, “He was soooo shy,” or “What a great dancer!” No classmates, not even the recorder for the Columbia class notes ever heard of him.
—NO GRADUATION PICTURES: Where is the footage of the graduation ceremony?
—NO TEACHERS KNEW HIM? Has anyone talked to the professors? Isn’t it odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him?
—NOTHING ABOUT HIS PAST: Wonder why no one ever came forward from 0bama’s past, saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc.? Not one person has ever come forward from his college past.
—NOT EVEN GEORGE KNOWS: George Stephanopoulos, ABC News, in 2008 campaign questioned why no one has acknowledged that the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. George graduated Columbia-class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him. Since he is such a great orator, why doesn’t anyone in 0bama’s college class remember him?
—NO COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY RECORDS? Why won’t he allow Columbia to release his records? Grades? Did he take classes? What club was he in?
—NOBODY REMEMBERS 0BAMA AT COLUMBIA: Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when 0bama claims to have been there, but not one remembers him. For example, Wayne Allyn Root was (like 0bama) a political science major at Columbia, who graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of 0bama, “I don’t know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don’t have a single classmate who ever knew Barack 0bama at Columbia ... EVER!”
—NOBODY KNOWS AT CLASS REUNION: Wayne Root remembers at their 20th class reunion five years ago, he was asked to be the speaker of the class—NOT 0bama. No one ever heard of Barack.
—NO 0BAMA PHOTOS / RECORDS IN COLUMBIA YEARBOOKS: 0bama’s photograph does not appear in the school’s yearbook. 0BAMA consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia.
the pupil of W.E.B. Du Bois, Paul Robeson,
whom Frank Marshall Davis credited with persuading him to go to Hawaii,
starred in a film named 'Sanders of the River' with Jomo Kenyatta
Jomo Kenyatta[pron.] (1889 – 22 August 1978) served as the first Prime Minister (1963–1964) and President (1964–1978) of Kenya. He is considered the founding father of the Kenyan nation.
AND THE GROUP IMAGES OF HARVARD LAW STUDENTS FOR 1988, 1989, 1999, 2000, 2001,2002 ARE MISSING.
first noticed THEY ARE MISSING IN 2008
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2118690/posts
OBAMA: Harvard Law Class Photos Missing
Harvard University Library ^ | 29 Oct. 2008 | self
Posted on Thursday, 30 October 2008 4:31:36 AM by Fort McCain
A search of the Harvard University Library digital image collection appears to reveal that group pictures of graduate students from 1988 through 2003 are missing from the collection. Obama was in the graduating class of 1991.
But you can see him in the centre of the image of the HARVARD LAW REVIEW at the FR link above.
My gripe is that there have been hundreds of threads with thousands of posts of incredible research on FR since the summer (at least) of 2008 about Zero’s background, lies, and so on. If you wanted to know the facts, you would have read them all, just as many of us have.
But you haven’t read them all, or absorbed much of what you have read. Instead, you have your own “ideas” that ignore the research already done. Not “ideas” but actual research.
(Hope you don't mind I re-used your previously posted Hmmmm image)
much more interesting stuff going on:
The Harvard Law Group images are missing from 1988 through to 2002, and freeper thecodont writes:
“...The blackout of HL alumni reunion dates covers about the same date range, 1988-2003.”
...and yesterday we discovered thanks to the sheriff, that the INS overseas arrivals records for the first week of August 1961 are missing...
Lucy, I hope there’s more room on your list.
And we don't need factcheck tricks to show us where it is.
Fred, would you happen to have a citation for that bit? I've searched for it, and all I've found so far is some bs at some site called nativeborncitizen.wordpress etc and at Fogbow.
Heck, if you've got linkage for all three points, that'd be even better, putting it out there again for FR toddlers like myself to peruse. The missing week's worth of INS arrival records however is what interests me in the main, at current. I would like to compare who is saying what with those of others regarding this nugget of info.
I watched the entire 80 minutes-plus of the Arpaio press conference and am trying to remember at what minute mark mention would have been made on this item, rather than having to watch the entire video again to find it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
