Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Leads In Washington ["Gingrich's Continued Presence In The State Is A Boost To Romney"]
PPPPolling ^ | February 24, 2012

Posted on 02/24/2012 9:53:29 AM PST by Steelfish

February 21, 2012

Santorum Leads In Washington

Wedged between the Michigan/Arizona primaries and Super Tuesday the Washington state GOP caucus hasn't received a lot of attention. At least for now it looks like it could give Rick Santorum some momentum headed into the critical March 6th contests. He leads there with 38% to 27% for Mitt Romney, 15% for Ron Paul, and 12% for Newt Gingrich.

Santorum is by far the most popular of the Republican candidates with 69% viewing him favorably to only 18% with a negative opinion. Romney is the only other one who even has a positive favorability rating. He's at 47/42. The disparity between Santorum and Romney's numbers in Washington resembles what we found for the contests two weeks ago in Missouri and Minnesota, both of which Santorum ended up winning by a healthy margin.

Next week looks like it could be disastrous for Gingrich. He's in 4th place in both Washington and Michigan, and in 3rd place in Arizona. He's not remotely close to finishing in the top 2 in any of those states. It's not just that Republican voters aren't planning to vote for Gingrich, they don't even like him any more. In Washington his favorability is upside down at 39/46 and the same is true in Michigan (39/50) and Arizona (43/48) as well.

Gingrich's continued presence in the state is a boost to Romney. If he pulled out before Washington 59% of his supporters say they'd move to Santorum, compared to only 13% who would go to Romney. That would make the overall standings Santorum 49, Romney 28, Paul 16- as long as Gingrich stays in and keeps splitting the conservative vote it's keeping Romney competitive.

(Excerpt) Read more at publicpolicypolling.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Politics
KEYWORDS: santorumtrolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: CAluvdubya

Precisely!

Newt Gingrich is a historian. He knows AMERICA.

Obama doesn’t and obama hates our history. He’s rooted in hate and it shows.

Newt Gingrich loves our country.

He has to be our nominee if we’re going to save and restore our Republic.

GO SARAH!

GO NEWT!

You know she will be a very important member of the Gingrich presidency!


42 posted on 02/24/2012 11:39:31 AM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

So how do you think Gingrich’s cavernous negatives and unfavorability ratings plus his Grand Canyon size deficit with female voters will play out?


43 posted on 02/24/2012 11:39:51 AM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; sodpoodle

sodpoodle; (sod) is a screen name. You’re out of your mind and filled with screaming personal attacks of your own!

LOL @ you.


44 posted on 02/24/2012 11:44:00 AM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
That's not static like this primary election and would easily turn around. Lets see now fish.

Mothers chauffeur their kids around and about where high $6 dollar gas prices don't sit well with them. No, that pee pees them off. Newt is outstanding on national security. Mothers are security conscious as a group. Two winning issue for Newt with women.

45 posted on 02/24/2012 11:47:02 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: onyx

LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!

Have often wondered if I should change that screen name. SOD is an olde English slang for sodomite - which could also be considered a nasty (prairie) dog.

FWIW I don’t recall you ever being spiteful and nasty - not your nature..............except, perhaps behind the wheel;)


46 posted on 02/24/2012 12:04:00 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Newt - God has tested him for a reason...... to bring America back from the brink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle; Steelfish

ROTFLOLOL.

I knew you’d get out of this one!

I can’t count the number of times you sign *sod* for short.

I use it to you affectionately and you know that. ((((sod))))

LOLOLOL.


47 posted on 02/24/2012 12:32:28 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle; Steelfish

ROTFLOLOL.

I knew you’d get a laugh out of this one!

I can’t count the number of times you sign *sod* for short.

I use it to you affectionately and you know that. ((((sod))))

LOLOLOL.


48 posted on 02/24/2012 12:32:46 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown
Arguing for Mr. Rogers as the better candidate is like choking up hairballs.

Now that is funny..LOL...still laughing.

:)

49 posted on 02/24/2012 12:42:34 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Do you know how Santorum matches with vote equivalents? In Caucus states, fewer people vote, so they represent a larger percentage of the general election population than in primary states.


50 posted on 02/24/2012 1:51:11 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

[So how do you think Gingrich’s cavernous negatives and unfavorability ratings plus his Grand Canyon size deficit with female voters will play out?]

About the same as Santorum’s cavernous sanctimony and debate skills plus his Grand Canyon size deficit with male voters will play out.

Just a guess.


51 posted on 02/24/2012 2:08:44 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: onyx

OK-will accept explanation. I didn’t think you were too bad a fella but just being a bit over the top.


52 posted on 02/24/2012 2:36:03 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Thanks very much, but I'm that "fella" with Jim. LOL
53 posted on 02/24/2012 2:40:50 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Question. I just read that Santorum’s wife had a partial birth abortion, if this is true, is this the same unborn baby they took home with family for the night to “cuddle?”


54 posted on 02/24/2012 2:41:28 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

No, I think it’s different baby.

I think the one they took home lived an hour or so.


55 posted on 02/24/2012 2:46:49 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Thnx onyx. That is a relief.


56 posted on 02/24/2012 2:56:41 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I fully understand the caucus versus primary thing, but that supports my case not yours. Santorum can only motivate the tiny hard core home school Huckabee vote, thus he does well in the teeny tiny universe of caucuses.

However, the Presidency is not won by caucus.


57 posted on 02/24/2012 5:05:19 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: georgiagirl_pam; Steelfish
Also, this poll was REPORTED on February 21, BEFORE the disastrous debate.

Yeah, what's up with the Steelfish? It's from the 21st, you claimed it's from today.

You changed the date when you posted to suit your agenda, giving a FALSE impression of this poll's timeliness.

58 posted on 02/24/2012 6:17:10 PM PST by newzjunkey (Santorum voted for Sotomayor, Obama's 1st Supreme Court nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson