Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Looks like an excellent appeals brief!
1 posted on 02/04/2012 10:05:02 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LucyT

ping to Apuzzo setting up the appeal...


2 posted on 02/04/2012 10:06:20 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
The Constutional Meaning Of "Natural Born Citizen"
3 posted on 02/04/2012 10:11:07 AM PST by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
The Constutional Meaning Of "Natural Born Citizen"
4 posted on 02/04/2012 10:11:13 AM PST by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

bttt


5 posted on 02/04/2012 10:21:03 AM PST by TEXOKIE (... and HAPPY NEW YEAR to all FREEPERS EVERYWHERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

I knew the fix was in on this one. No way this goes anywhere.


6 posted on 02/04/2012 10:21:14 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Do all He commands. Receive all He promises.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
Apuzzo - Surely, the court did not use those “insufficient” documents as evidence of Obama’s place of birth. Nor does the judge tell us that he used those documents for any such purpose. The judge also does not tell us that the court took any judicial notice of any evidence (not to imply that it could). The judge did find that Obama has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party. But with the rules of evidence of superior court applying, this finding does not establish anyone’s place of birth. Hence, what evidence did the judge have to rule that Obama is born in the United States? The answer is none.


It was the Obama fairy from La La Land that told him so.

7 posted on 02/04/2012 10:26:55 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

All that is wrong?

It means the executive does not answer to the judiciary, and Holder’s actions confirm that.

We now live in a banana dictatorship. With occasional machete attacks, too. Now, we wait for the necklace burnings to start.


8 posted on 02/04/2012 10:49:43 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
But there is no evidence before the Court that Obama was born in the United States. The court can only rest its finding of fact on evidence that is part of the court record. The judge tells us that he decided the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims. But he does not tell us in his decision what evidence he relied upon to “consider[]” that Obama was born in the United States.

The judge is either...

1)a MARXIST LOVING MORONIC DEMOCRAT

2)Drunk

3)STUPID

or

4)ALL OF THE ABOVE!!

9 posted on 02/04/2012 10:50:47 AM PST by ExCTCitizen (If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

The lawyers in the Georgia case need to seriously consider hiring Mario to brief and argue their cases on appeal.


13 posted on 02/04/2012 11:20:31 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

BTW, when one reads the Ankeny decision, it reads so much like the arguments demoncrats made in their several efforts to negate the Article II requirement of ‘natural born citizen’ (which have occurred over a decade or more in congressional efforts to amend the Constitution without using the Constitutional method) that I am wondering how many of those involved in crafting the Ankeny deceit were staff members of democrats who previously in congress tried to change the requirement? The democrat party is a criminal enterprise and they have been seeking any means to negate the restricting Constitution. With the anti-Constitutional ruling in Ankeny they appear to have finally managed to cancel what they worked to cancel but couldn’t through congress critter meddling. [Are there any good working guillotines anywhere in this nation?]


14 posted on 02/04/2012 11:27:22 AM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

pissed-off bookmark.


17 posted on 02/04/2012 11:54:35 AM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
As I have mentioned ad-nauseum here, Mr. Malihi clearly does not understand grammar. Otherwise, he would know that Amendment XIV can never be used to substitute "Natural Born Citizen" with "Citizen of the United States".
18 posted on 02/04/2012 11:55:23 AM PST by devattel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]




Donate Just One Monthly
And Become a FR Hero

Donate $1 A Day!
Isn't FR Worth It?

WHAT WOULD YOU DO WITHOUT FREE REPUBLIC?


21 posted on 02/04/2012 12:20:43 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

An appeal of the GA SoS decision will be de novo, clean start, fresh slate. If Plaintiffs had gotten Obama removed from the GA ballot, he would have walked away and never had to testify under oath.

An appeal to the GA Superior Court by the Plaintiffs will mean Obama will be summoned to appear in Court and noticed to prepare to testify under oath and produce documents. Nancy Pelosi submitted herself to Georgia’s jurisdiction when she submitted a sworn statement to the GA SoS in 2008 Obama was eligible. Nancy is subject to subpoena and notice to produce.

The Obama house of cards is about to fall, but it will take time.


25 posted on 02/04/2012 12:38:00 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (What would MacGyver do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

As I’ve repeatedly said, until the 14th Amendment is corrected to mean born owing only one allegiance, and that being to the United States per the 1868 Expatriation Act, all efforts to uphold A2S1C5 are futile. One doesn’t clean up manure by spraying the area with deodorizer 1st. Until the manure is taken away, no deodorizer is going to have any lasting affect.


31 posted on 02/04/2012 2:40:41 PM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

When will somebody handle the fact that Obama was not born in the United States? If he were, he would have a birth certificate. As for his transcripts from school and why nobody seems to remember him, perhaps if they asked about Barry Sotoro they would remember. Do you remember when he was a candidate that he said he used the system well? That is because he got every dime he could from the federal government, by lying, by cheating, by declaring himself to be a foreign exchange student.

If judge R. Barclay Surrick had any intestinal fortitude, we would not be here right now. He had the chance when Philip Berg brought suit against Obama in Philadelphia Pennsylvania. He demanded Obama produce a birth certificate, then yellowed out before the 2008 election.


35 posted on 02/04/2012 3:57:34 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

It was a big mistake to reject the ALJ’s offer of entry of a default judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

Judge tells you he is willing to enter a default judgment, you always take it. Overcoming a default judgment is almost impossible when the defendant has no meritorious defense OR no excusable neglect for not filing an answer that addresses the merits of the case.


86 posted on 02/06/2012 2:55:17 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

What many people are failing to understand is that the opinion of an ALJ is nothing more than his opinion. The SoS can decide whatever he wants. It is his decision that can be appealed by either party. The SoS is free to ignore the opinion of the ALJ and may do so given the extreme weakness of the ALJ’s conclusions.


88 posted on 02/06/2012 3:19:05 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp

I just find it ironic(and confusing) that a hearing about wether or not a candidate is eligible for an office, that requires the candidate to be a “natural born Citizen”, completely ignores the one supreme court case the explicitly states what a “natural born Citizen” is!

One would think that a lower court would need to address this case one way or the other? But I guess it’s true that a court IS much like
a fiefdom, and a judge it’s monarch!

Had the court at least mentioned MInor, and commented on it , the ruling may have made some sense - but to not even mention it??? Judge Malihi was declaring himself to be a third rate hack!


95 posted on 02/06/2012 6:24:54 PM PST by MMaschin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson