Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CainConservative

I’d say Newt, then Mitt by a 10 point spread 46/36 - . Santorum and Paul now in single digits - 9/9


9 posted on 01/20/2012 2:24:36 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

This is a pretty sad statement on the country. Santorum (totally ignored by the media) wins a state and we don’t know for weeks while the MSM annoints Mitt as the guy and the RINO’s push their guy Newt on us in the meantime.

We’ve been had. Again.

Neither Mitt nor Newt is a conservative and neither is going to beat Obama.


11 posted on 01/20/2012 2:39:55 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

“I’d say Newt, then Mitt by a 10 point spread 46/36 - . Santorum and Paul now in single digits - 9/9”

That would be perfect insuring Santorum dropping out!

Or I might go with..

Newt 40 (McLame had 33)
Willard 29 (Huck had 30)
Paul 15 (Fred had 15)
Santorum 9 (’08 Mitt had 14)


21 posted on 01/20/2012 3:33:50 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Rubio 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson