Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

Oh really????

Find it in any of these cases:

Reynolds v. United States
Wilkerson v. Utah

Kilbourn v. Thompson
Same court.

If her citizenship was GERMANE to this case you would have have a discussion of her parents citizenship.

You want to see the difference??

Flores -Villar was a citizenship case.
Scotus discussed Nguyen in that case. This time oral arguments didn’t breath a word about NBC.

But as for citizenship - look at the difference between this when it is germane and Minor WHEN IT WAS NOT.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/09-5801

Minor was a VOTING case NOT a citizenship case.


701 posted on 01/21/2012 3:59:45 PM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick
We're not discussing those cases. We're discussing MvH. I've shown you the Court's declaration that the question before the Court included the plaintiff's assertion that Minor was a citizen and the Court's declaration that it had to affirm Minor's citizenship before it could address her right to vote. If you still don't get that Minor's citizenship was not mentioned in passing, then I can't help you.
713 posted on 01/21/2012 4:55:21 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson