He is talking about PERSONAL JURISDICTION. Article III talks about judicial power.
Btw, Minor was a CITIZEN of Missouri . This fact was not in dispute. How do you figure that she was a citizen of a different state than Happersett who was acting on Missouri’s law?
The court threw out the complaint. It made it’s way to SCOTUS.
Now tell me how the two parties are from different states?????
Btw,it is important to know what happens with a demurrer.The judge has to assume all material facts are true.
You got that????
It’s a “so what” if they are true decision.
I went back and read the ENTIRE passage. Your understanding is much worse than I thought.
The court is using that passage to show that there have been many cases involving women and personal jurisdiction and not one raised an objection based on sex.
Good Lord, that excerpt has nothing to do with putting her own citizenship on the record.