Replies

“...I think there is a STRONG possibility that all he has on file is an affidavit of birth which was written and signed by his Grandmother. If this is the case, it will not be perceived as strong proof that he was actually born in this country. It will in fact, inflame his critics and arouse suspicion from the entire electorate....”

There are no pictures of baby Obama. Even if he was born in a ~~manger~~ Hawaiian Hut to SAD, married or not, there would be pictures at some point before 3 years of age. IMO SAD was asked to become a nanny for a 3 year old and the Grandmother knew just how to make it look like the kid was legit, a divorce. It wasn't until Zero wanted, or was chosen, to become Prez that they had to go back and create an identity. Even himself until that point was calling himself a Kenyan. Hence the book, the stolen Virginia's BC, ect.

There are no pictures of baby Obama. Even if he was born in a manger Hawaiian Hut to SAD, married or not, there would be pictures at some point before 3 years of age. IMO SAD was asked to become a nanny for a 3 year old and the Grandmother knew just how to make it look like the kid was legit, a divorce. It wasn't until Zero wanted, or was chosen, to become Prez that they had to go back and create an identity. Even himself until that point was calling himself a Kenyan. Hence the book, the stolen Virginia's BC, ect.

That is too much speculation upon which to base a solid theory. The fact that we haven't seen pictures of him under three proves nothing. My family has no pictures of me at that age. I know lots of people for whom this is true. Whether the Grandmother used a divorce to create a birth record, or did it from the very beginning is not in evidence, nor do we even know for sure that she did it at all. We also do not know that Virginia's birth certificate was commandeered by Obama. All of that stuff is speculation.

It is useful for thinking up theories to explore different possibilities, but it is not useful for narrowing the theories down to provable or not. To prove a theory, we must have facts which ARE proven.

I do not doubt at all that Hawaii learned of Barack Obama on August 4th, 1961. I do not accept that the newspaper announcements were forged, or created after the fact. I think the evidence for that is only speculative and inconclusive. At the moment I believe it is far more likely that those newspaper announcements are real, and reflect what was entered into the record at that time.

“There are no pictures of baby Obama. Even if he was born in a manger Hawaiian Hut to SAD, married or not, there would be pictures at some point before 3 years of age. IMO SAD was asked to become a nanny for a 3 year old and the Grandmother knew just how to make it look like the kid was legit, a divorce.”

IMO this is a preposterous theory not supported by any documentation. We do have pictures of baby Barry (sure, none have been produced in evidence...but) and the adult Barry looks just like his Gramps in the “big smile” pictures. Also IMO Barry's half-brother, David in Kenya looked just like him establishing the paternity link to BHO Sr.

We also have the US Gov’t INS docs showing strong belief that there was a bigamous marriage in Feb 2 1961 and a baby by SADO and SADO intending to move to WA in the fall of 1961, all of which are corroborated by U of WA and U of HI documents.