Ga. judge orders p_resident to appear at hearing
See # 265, also here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2835602/posts
.
Posted on 01/20/2012 10:57:39 AM PST by GregNH
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
Obama Ballot Challenge
Stop Obama From Another Four Years
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/
Let’s get him kicked all the ballots.
In this case, wouldn’t the remedy be that the judge could just claim he didn’t appear as ordered and keep him off the GA ballot? It only has to happen in one state to get the ball rolling. He’d never win GA’s EVs anyway, but by being kept off a ballot for failure to qualify opens all kinds of inquiry.
And a default judgement generally prohitits an appeal on the merits. Procedural and law appeals are still appropriate, but the facts as alleged by the plaintiff in his/her complaint are held to be proven.
And a default judgement generally prohitits an appeal on the merits. Procedural and law appeals are still appropriate, but the facts as alleged by the plaintiff in his/her complaint are held to be proven.
Agree, and it is completely appropriate that a fogbrain wants to see it. :)
To the contrary, if he can’t qualify to get on the primary ballot, by default he can’t qualify to get on the general election ballot. The math is simple on this.
Where do I go to apply for President ? I’d like to fill out an application.
There are three cases that are being heard in this hearing. The one I am most hopeful for is the one being handled by Hatfield. He is citing Minor V. Happersett which is BINDING law. Minor is Obama’s Achilles heel. I have some hope for this one.
This story is not true. He was born on a Military base in Panama, not in a civilian hospital. That John McCain birth certificate which is floating around the net is fake. McCain did not release his birth certificate, but he did show it to the reporter that made this report.
Not that it matters now, but as Freepers it is our duty to report the truth.
Ga. judge orders p_resident to appear at hearing
See # 265, also here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2835602/posts
.
You are right. You can’t believe anything unless it can be verified by (preferably multiple) external sources.
In the interest of accuracy, you should specify that this is your opinion and nothing more.
No court has rendered such a decision. Nor is it likely that any court would ever determine that a child born to a military couple on station overseas would be somehow ineligible for the office of President.
Interesting, rewriting history maneuver.
Trump was on Fox a few weeks ago, again brought up how Obama's book was likely not written by him, was a big part of his election strategy.
Maybe they are also preparing for Sheriff Joe's findings.
Remember, eight states have determined that their electoral college votes will be given to the candidate who wins the popular vote. Imagine the global doomage level cranial blow outs if the Republican won the popular vote by 1/2 million and by default won California, Massachusetts, Hawaii and Illinois?
That is a fake birth certificate. McCain did not release his birth certificate. 6 months ago, I could have shown you the links to the document that the fake McCain birth certificate was created from. If you could wade through all the garbage on the net, you will eventually find it.
Below is what I posted last May including a comment I sent to Leo Donofrio that he refused to publish. My prediction that Obama could resort to calling himself a bastard to save himself on the NBC issure may be coming true, if this Facebook ad is true.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2713634/replies?c=30
begin quote
Whether Hawaii considered Senior and SADO to be married is immaterial to whether the UK would consider the Hawaii marriage to be bigamous and thus invoke the illegitimacy clause of the 1948 BNA.
For Barry to be a UK subject and dual-citizen would depend on how the UK would apply their own 1948 BNA law and the Kenya Colonial 1902 Marriage Act.
Here is a comment I posted to Leo (which he has refused to publish) beginning with the Factcheck.org statement:
“As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”
Parsing this statement, I note the careful lawyerly reluctance to explicitly state that Obama II, like his father, was also a British subject at birth. The statement only says that the 1948 BNA “governed the status” of his father’s children in general. IOW, the statement invites the reader to conclude that BHO II was a dual citizen British subject at birth, but does not say so.
If the 1948 BNA “governs the status” of Obama Sr.’s children, then any exclusions in that act must be considered. As you recently blogged:
“The State Department Has “Always” Recognized And Abided By Foreign Laws Concerning US Citizens Born With Dual Nationality.”
Therefore we must not be squeamish in applying the 1948 BNA to Obama II.
The 1948 BNA says that the act does NOT apply to illegitimate children:
“(2) Subject to the provisions of section twenty-three of this Act, any reference in this Act to a child shall be construed as a reference to a legitimate child; and the expressions “father”, “ancestor” and “descended” shall be construed accordingly.”
http://www.uniset.ca/naty/BNA1948.htm
My understanding is that a bigamous marriage is a nullity and the children of a bigamous marriage are illegitimate under the UK Legitimacy Act of 1926. BHO II himself has recognized his stepmother, Kezia, and her children as family and wrote in “Dreams” of his father’s shortcomings and doubts about the marital status of his parents.
In a Daily Mail story about Kezia, presumably based on information provided by her, BHO Sr is described as a “bigamist” and the presumably legal Kenyan tribal marriage between Obama Sr. and Kezia is described in some detail:
In applying the 1948 BNA to determine whether a marriage is bigamous, it seems that UK authorities would look to the 1902 Kenya Marriage Act (KMA). From what I have found so far (not a lawyer) the 1902 KMA appears to have still been in effect in 1961 in Kenya Colony.
Under the 1902 KMA, tribal marriages are legal and subsequent marriages are bigamous, including even marriages following Muslim marriage:
37. Marriages under native law or custom.
“Any person who is married under this Act, or whose marriage is declared by this Act to be valid, shall be incapable during the continuance of such marriage of contracting a valid marriage under any native law or custom, but, save as aforesaid, nothing in this Act contained shall affect the validity of any marriage contracted under or in accordance with any native law or custom, or in any manner apply to marriages so contracted.”
“49. Contracting marriage under this Act when already married by native law or custom.
Whoever contracts a marriage under this Act, being at the time married in accordance with native law or custom or in accordance with Mohammedan law to any person other than the person with whom such marriage is contracted, shall be guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.”
http://www.kenyalaw.org/kenyalaw/klr_app/frames.php
30 posted on 05/02/2011 2:36:30 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
end quote
Depends on how you splain it.
If Osama Bin Laden knocked up an American, then took the baby back to Pockystain to raise as a good little American hating Jew killing Sand Nazi, would he be eligible?
I don’t know if that BC is a forgery or not. If he was born on a military base, it still doesn’t mean he was born on U.S. soil.
From the Foreign Affairs manual:
7 FAM 1113 NOT INCLUDED IN THE MEANING OF “IN THE UNITED STATES”
c. Birth on U.S. Military Base Outside of the United States or Birth on U.S. Embassy or Consulate Premises Abroad:
(1) Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic facilities are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not subject to U.S. jurisdiction and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth.”
If this is for real, why doesn’t ANY news feed have this story?
Just wondering.
“Calling all foreign and domestic aspirin factories.”
My thought exactly!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.