New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Dept of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara(Virginia' brother)

ObamaRelease YourRecords ^ | Wednesday, January 4, 2012; 5:02 PM

[Red Steel]

Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara
Lawsuit against the Hawaii Department of Health has been filed by Hawaii Attorney Gerald Kurashima on behalf of Duncan Sunahara, Virginia Sunahara's brother. The case has been assigned to Judge Nishimura. Dean Haskins of the Birther Summit will be making a public announcement about this case very soon. Stay tuned for further updates.

The case is listed as follows;

Flashback;
Hawaii Department of Health Funny Business Regarding Virginia Sunahara

Copy courtesy of www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords -www.BirtherReport.com via butterdezillion.wordpress.com

HDOH Denies Having Birth Record for Virginia Sunahara

Virginia Sunahara was born on Aug 4, 1961 and died the next day. Her death was announced in both theHonolulu Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin. Her name is in both the 1960-64 birth index and 1960-64death index.But when I asked for a non-certified copy of her abbreviated birth certificate the HDOH told me thatthey have no records responsive to my request. On previous requests for other COLB I had been told that I could not get a copy because I did not have a direct and tangible interest. But in this case they flat-out told me they don't have a birth record for Virginia. Even though their birth index says they do.

(See the birth index page at http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/05/15/attention-whores-moles-and-morethe-thief/ ).

Either the HDOH lied about having no records for her, or they queried her name and the computer no longer has that record under her name, even though it was under her name when they printed the 1960-64 birth index sometime around March of 2010. What happened to Virginia's birth record? Was the name on it changed to Barack Hussein Obama II so he could have her BC#? The HDOH needs to be audited, to find out what has happened with Sunahara's birth record. Here is the HDOH’s claim that they have no birth record for a girl listed on their birth index:

From: hdohinfo
To: Nellie
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:00 PM
Subject: RE: UIPA Request - non-certified abbreviated BC for Tomiyo
SunaharaAloha Ms. (redacted):We have no records responsive to your request. Hawaii Department of Health Public Information Office staff
Send mail to:State Department of Health
Office of Health Status Monitoring
Issuance/Vital Statistics Section/UIPA Request
Honolulu, HI 97801
hdohinfo@doh.hawaii.gov

Excerpted, more here at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html#comment-form

[Ladysforest]

Yep, I know. I think the average was 40+ per day.

[Fred Nerks]

...We located Hawaii had a Christian name law since the 19th century.

Would you still have a link to that information please? I would be interested to learn if that meant Christian Name or FIRST NAME.

[bushpilot1]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2828807/posts?page=119#119

[Faith]

Thank you for the link, Fred.

[Greenperson]

Thanks for filling me in. I do have a lot of catching up to do. I haven’t had time to keep up. I didn’t understand the reason his name mattered.

As for the edit, you’re right; I wonder what they took out? Probably something to protect the man, if he said something untoward. I noticed that he was being careful about saying it was his opinion (about the numbers).

[Marine_Uncle]

The plot thickens..... :)

[Fred Nerks]

thanks...I missed that when you first posted it. Makes me wonder, as there are a lot of different races on the islands, were they ALL required to give their Hawaiian born offspring CHRISTIAN names? For example, if you were Japanese parents, would you have been unable to give your child a Japanese FIRST name?
Seems rather heavy-handed to me.

I can understand the natives being told to use their father’s name as a SURNAME - as I am under the impression the natives did not have surnames, but others HAD surnames. And what you posted the link to, reads as if the FIRST NAMES given had to be CHRISTIAN. (And Duncan isn’t Christian that I am aware of, the origin is SCOTLAND and would have existed long before Christianity came to Britain.

[Political Junkie Too]

Perhaps if he were someone entirely different than who he has claimed to be...

That was always the leading alternative theory.

Even if it turns out that he was fathered by Uncle Frank (or Grandpa from a local hooker), it would violate everything that Obama wrote in his book "Dreams from my Father," for which he received huge sums of money and launched his political career.

Obama would be exposed as a manufactured fraud. Then the deep conspiracy theories begin. Why was Obama's entire history manufactured? What was he being groomed to do that needed an empty past?

-PJ

[Greenperson]

Curious, ain’t it? Did someone say that somebody at the HDOH is in that family tree, too?

[Greenperson]

Thanks for the video.

[Greenperson]

I didn’t pay close enough attention. When exactly did Duncan get the copy of the short form? Are you saying that he gave a copy of his to Taitz, or that somebody else did?

Why would the Dept. of Health say they had no record responsive to the request instead of saying, if this was their excuse, that the person making the request wasn’t entitled to it?

[Greenperson]

That’s brilliant! So think about it: If Stanley Ann had been born in Hawaii, she wouldn’t have been Stanley. Her Christian name would have to be “suitable” to her sex.

[Greenperson]

That’s brilliant! So think about it: If Stanley Ann had been born in Hawaii, she wouldn’t have been Stanley. Her Christian name would have to be “suitable” to her sex.

[Greenperson]

Sorry for the double post.

[Fred Nerks]

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/out-of-order-obamas-non-sequential.html

Read this paragraph carefully, and each time you see the name ‘Obama’ substitute the name ‘Virginia’ and it should become clear why both baby COATS and Virginia’s birth certificates show the name of the same local registrar. Because they were both born in the same hospital.
Where is Virginia’s birth certificate, you may ask. I think you are looking at it. It’s numbered 10641.

I will substitute the names here now, as an experiment:

“Therefore, the Nordyke’s Kapi’olani generated birth certificates were signed on August 11th by the registrar, three days later than Obama’s VIRGINIA’S registration, because the Nordyke’s certificates were two of more than 100 which occurred in that registration office during that week. Obama’s VIRGINIA’S was signed on August 8th and recorded three days earlier because his VIRGINIA’S Certificate was merely one of four registration records occurring in that local office. The process moved faster for Obama’s VIRGINIA’S registration because there were fewer certificates for that local registrar to process than the quantity of registrations processed in the office used by the city’s main hospital where the Nordyke’s registered. This occurred because of the 50-percent sampling and geographic number order process required by the U.S. Department and its effect on Obama’s VIRGINIA’S “externally” registered birth in another registration office not used by the hospital.”

So while the analysis attemps to tell us that the reason the numbers are out of sequence is due to zero having been born in another hospital in Hawaii, in fact, what the analysis shows is that Virginia was born in the same hospital as baby COATS, a matter which DUNCAN SUNAHARA has now confirmed in the video, in which he clearly names the hospital.

http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/7492/birthcertcoats7c.jpg

WAHIAWA GENERAL HOSPITAL. And the name of the LOCAL REGISTRAR is the same on both.

[Fred Nerks]

you’re too quick for me...I didn’t think of THAT!

[butterdezillion]

Orly’s comments on her blog talk about Duncan getting the COLB and the number being out of sequence, so it was his COLB that she referred to in her lawsuit.

The HDOH’s response regarding Sunahara caught my eye because I had requested several other similar items (non-certified copy of the short-form BC) for other people like Stanley Ann, Obama, etc (all people identifiable with Obama) and the (incorrect) response was always that HRS 338-18 prohibits disclosing the record to someone who doesn’t have a direct and tangible interest. But on this particular one they claimed the record didn’t exist.

My theory is that one of two things happened.

When I called the HDOH office to find out why my request for the 1961 birth index wasn’t being processed the gal I talked to searched all over the place and then suddenly asked, “Was this about Obama?” I asked if it would make any difference. She said that yes, it would because anything about Obama goes to Okubo.

The requests that I had given before were obviously “about Obama” so they were sent to Okubo. A colleague of mine sent on the same day two index requests - one about a Dunham and another about somebody not obviously related to Obama. The one not about Obama was answered within the 2 weeks, IIRC, but the one about Obama took another month to get a response. At some point Okubo decided that all index requests were “about Obama” - as she told the AP’s Mark Niesse directly in a response to his request.

My request regarding Sunahara would not be known as related to Obama unless the HDOH told all their people that they were related - which would make more potential whistle-blowers. It was not an index data request so it was not sent to Okubo for that reason. So if the request was not known to be “about Obama”, it would have been sent directly to the “fulfillment office” (as she called it). They would look in the computer and if they saw a birth record for Sunahara then they would give whatever response fit the general order (and the HDOH was operating under the assumption that if they couldn’t release it for Obama then they couldn’t release it for anybody because then it would be apparent that they were treating Obama’s records differently). So if the record was there the fulfillment people would have given the same answer that Okubo has been giving all along.

But they didn’t find it there. It wasn’t in the computer database any more. That record had somebody else’s name attached to it. So they innocently told me there wasn’t any record. That’s possibility #1.

Possibility #2 is that the request went to Okubo anyway and she just wanted to put me off the scent. But that doesn’t really make sense, like you say. The consistent answer would have put me off the scent. This answer stood out like a porkchop at a kosher wedding.

[Ladysforest]

We’ve known all along that VS was BORN in Wahiawa. Her mother told Researcher that, and we have a record of that encounter.

I’ve said all along that we have actual proof of the meeting with the Sunaharas. I wasn’t screwing around about that.

[Fred Nerks]

...But they didn’t find it there. It wasn’t in the computer database any more. That record had somebody else’s name attached to it. So they innocently told me there wasn’t any record. That’s possibility #1.

Possibility #2 is that the request went to Okubo anyway and she just wanted to put me off the scent. But that doesn’t really make sense, like you say. The consistent answer would have put me off the scent.

What strikes me is either way, if her name had been replaced by another, or they were lying when they said her name wasn't there...the name appears on the birth/death index. How sloppy are they? Did they forget about the index?

[LucyT]

a matter which DUNCAN SUNAHARA has now confirmed

See # 135 , # 104 , - also check out graphics at # 120 .

Time permitting, it might be helpful to begin at # 101 and read to end of page.

Thanks Fred Nerks.