Posted on 12/08/2011 7:26:24 AM PST by jmaroneps37
An analysis of Barack Obama’s reelection chances shows most of what we are being told to be lies half truths and distortions designed to scare conservatives and dampen our spirits.
Consider these points.
We have heard over and over that even trying to win this election is hopeless because anywhere from 46% to 52% (or whatever the media thinks would scare and dishearten us) of Americans are receiving federal money so they won’t vote against their own interests.
This presupposes those who are used to sitting back and taking from the rest of us will vote at a rate even equal to the rate we will vote at.
We will be protecting our families and America’s future; we won’t be staying home. A recent enthusiasm survey, done by the liberal NBC/WSJ, showed that liberals are 21 points less likely to vote than conservatives – and conservatives out number liberals 2 to 1.
“….RINO John Podhoretz tried his hand at scaring us by mentioning Obama will have $750 million dollars to throw at Newt Gingrich should he become our nominee – as if he wouldn’t spend the same amount attacking Romney.
While this is far below the ONE BILLION DOLLARS in the continuing scare tactic version of how Obama’s fund raising is progressing, even $750,000,000 may be an unattainable goal.
“… Karl Rove has dissected…, “…….Team Obama made a big thing of their 260,000 new small dollar donors. But that means only 292,000 donors from his last campaign have renewed their support for the re-elect so far. That’s just 6.6 percent of the 3.95 million people who donated to the ’08 Obama effort….
“…In 2008 66% of voters 18 to 29 voted for Obama but the latest NBC/WSJ survey shows their support has fallen to 48%...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
I keep hearing that obama will be re-elected and so unless a GOOD CONSERVATIVE comes forth, and Gingrich is NOT, we are stuck with this usurper i the white house for another 4 years.
That's because Newt would mop up Obama in all three debates. Newt also gets to crow about balanced budgets, and shrinking the size of government - all of which led to Clinton's perceived success. Does Obama really want to crap on the Clinton years? If he does, bad move.
What I see on the ground:
1. Lots of former Obama supporters will not vote for him again. Most of the independents that I know are disappointed. However, the conservative candidate needs to be careful not to scare them off. Many minorities, especially Hispanics (I know lots of legal immigrants from Mexico) think Obama’s economic performance has been dismal. Even the African Americans are hurting in this economy.
2. The Obama dim MACHINE is extremely well funded and powerful. They have skimmed off tens of billions from Porkulus, etc. to finance the MACHINE. It’s like Chicago on steroids nationwide. The sheep will be bused, herded, and cajoled into line at the ballot box.
3. Tea Party vets continue to organize and steadily work for their cause, but I don’t think it is enough. I will believe that Obama will be defeated when I see 90% of the precincts with active Chairs who get-out-the-vote. Conservatives are not taking the fight seriously enough. This is not a spectator sports; its a WAR.
How many of the 3.95 million people were foreigners who had small donations bundled to look like US voters? Wasn't the FEC looking into this? Oh, yeah, the FEC - Federal Election Coverup.
What makes you say that conservatives are not taking this race seriously - the 21 point enthusiasm gap between conservatives and Democrats? Just asking.
We still have too many Keyboard Activists and pontificators.
Not enough boots on the ground type activists.
Every time someone starts sharing with me how much they hate Obama I ask them if they will serve in a campaign or volunteer as an Election Judge, Clerk, etc. I get few takers.
For example, Milwaukee has about 26% more registered voters than the Census says they have people over 18 y/o. Its a lot of work, but someone needs to try to contact every voter to determine how many are real. The fake voters need to subscribe to the New York Times, Rolling Stone, et al. Let them try to collect the subscription invoices!
Any ideas on how to handle fake voters?
I d not think Newt will allow Obama lies about how things have never worked to pass without pointing each out and then dissecting them.I see Obama as a ballon of hot air and Newt as the pin.
The vote rolls should be public information and along with that are addresses.You need to look up the addresses and see if those people really live there or if they are fake addresses.
We’ll be hearing about Hussein’s invincibility and Newt’s lack of funds/followers from the MSM up to and including election day.
Voter Rolls are public.
Most of the vote fraud is from real, addresses. Otherwise they could not have the Voter Registration Card or Absentee Ballot mailed to them.
I need to re-post my Vote Fraud Opus on FR. For example, in the 1996 election I knocked on the doors of 200 registered voters in Orange County, CA. 50% DID NOT EXIST! Eventually I met with the lone vote fraud investigator for the CA AG’s office, and he told me, “For $500,000 in cash ANYONE can win the primary and the general election. The guys who do this are professionals. They create tens of thousands of “phantom voters” and then vote them absentee.”
TrueTheVote.org and allied organizations across the country are attacking the vote fraud problem.
I urge my fellow Freepers to get involved in their areas. Every big city in the country is a hotbed of fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.