Newt Gingrich is More Dangerous To America Than Obama and I Can Prove It!

A Time For Choosing ^ | 11-28-11 | Gary P Jackson

[Lazlo in PA]

Yes, Newt Gingrich is more dangerous to the well-being of the United States, and our people, than Barack Obama. That’s a strong statement, and I intend to prove it!

There are many ways to prove this.

I’ll use Newt’s actual voting record, as well as his many positions that run counter to what’s best for the Republic. I’ll also talk about his abilities to persuade otherwise intelligent people to follow him into the abyss.

You see it’s this ability to take the hard left’s positions, and carefully re-word them, making them sound like “conservative” positions, that makes Newt such a threat. Newt knows the language of the Conservative, though he’s never been one. He knows the words that excite the Conservative mind. And this is the real key to it all.

We’ll get to Newt’s lengthy record as a “progessive” in due time, but I want readers to fully understand it’s Newt’s highly developed skills as a con man that should worry all Americans. It’s THE reason his is so dangerous.

Barack Obama is a communist. He’s the most radical president we’ve ever elected. More radical than “progessives” Teddy or Franklin Roosevelt, more radical than LBJ or Carter. The nation’s only saving grace is: Obama is a bumbling fool, who can barely string two sentences together.

Obama has little skill in actual governing, so as bad as he is, much of his agenda [thankfully] hasn’t come to pass. Obama isn’t a leader, and simply can’t get things done. He’s also a bit on the lazy side, and would rather just go play and enjoy the all the perks that come with the office.

[Lazlo in PA]

Why can't we all jump behind a conservative instead????

Hear, hear.

[Neoliberalnot]

Support the candidate with the best chance of beating the most hate-filled anti-american fascist ever to rear his evil head in America. Obama is here to destroy the US and our kid’s future. None of the other candidates are on the same mission. Obama’s defeat at any cost is our mission, plain and simple.

I would support 3 honorable generals to have him removed from office along with several of his supporters in congress and the court system.

[Sequoyah101]

I don’t favor Romney.

Palin is not running but I didn’t favor her either, she doesn’t want to run.

[libdestroyer]

PUHHHLEASE!

You guys honestly think Gingrich would have passed that terrible Healthcare bill? What’s more, do you think the democrat congress would have even ATTEMPTED to pass it knowing Gingrich was the POTUS?

Yes he has some bad records. He also has some very good accomplishments. The Contract With America won republicans the congress for the first time in 40 years and they kept that promise. They also balanced the budget (which clinton UN-rightfully takes credit for).

I WOULDN’T trust a candidate whose own healthcare policy was the basis for Obamacare.

[libdestroyer]

“Since Cain was the bottom of my acceptable list, with Perry and Gingrich below that mark, though still above Romney, if Cain does fail, then I revert to writing in a conservative.”

Ok if you’re going to write-in a conservative, here’s what you should do:

1. Go to a polling place
2. Fill out your poll
3. Throw it in the garbage can
4. Congrats on wasting your vote

I’m a Cain guy too, but in the general election I am ABO!

[libdestroyer]

List of people that you would deem acceptable:
1. Jesus

[libdestroyer]

“I will NOT vote for N00t nor will I vote for Mitt. Not in the Primary or General elections.”

Then you’re a waste of space. If Obama wins due to people like you, then you’ve forfeited the right to complain.

[Lazlo in PA]

You guys honestly think Gingrich would have passed that terrible Healthcare bill?

He may not have passed as far reaching a plan as the Rats, but he in on the record saying that Romneycare mandates are a good thing and he was on a crusade with Hitlery not too long ago for Fed Gov't involvement in health care. Gov't controls on peoples medical information in the name of "progress". Plus his clients he was lobbying for were beneficiaries of this bill passing.

How many Repubs do you see with Newt at this rally for his brand of health reform? I just as soon my Conservative candidate was not more comfortable with Hitlery and Pelosi than with Paul Ryan and Reagan.

[Ingtar]

That would really waste my vote as then my votes for other conservatives would not count.

[Ingtar]

That would really waste my vote as then my votes for other conservatives would not count.

[God luvs America]

ditto that....lot of people i would’ve wanted- obama is one i will do anything to GTFO....

[hattend]

Damn straight and BTTT

[editor-surveyor]

>> “In that case, then Obama would be better then Romney as well.” <<

.
Actually no, because Romney is nowhere near as slick and persuasive as Newt. He is just as socialist for sure, but getting his agenda across wouldn’t be as easy for Mitt.

Newt knows the ropes in congress like nobody else. He successfully blunted the GOP majority in the ‘90s, and actually increased funding for all of the socialist elements of government. He conned the public into believing the budget had been balanced, even though he had cleverly disguised the fact that the debt service, which was almost as large as the budget, had been hidden in more debt.

Do you really think Mitt could have pulled all that off?

They’re both toxic, because neither of them wants to repeal O care, and the power of that issue is the best weapon we have.

We need a real republican.

[libdestroyer]

“Newt wont win... He wont have a ground game... Its conservative activists like me who provide the ground game.”

Then who will win, oh wise one?
I guess you’re the king maker?

[editor-surveyor]

>> “If the Right doesn’t come out in full force, it won’t be just the Presidency we lose.” <<

.
And you can bet that if Newt is the nominee, lots of voters will opt to have their root canal cleaned out on Nov. 8.

[editor-surveyor]

Any response from Newt will be another lie.

Run right, govern left is the way he goes.

[editor-surveyor]

>> “In this election whoever can beat obama is the candidate.” <<

.
That sure isn’t Newt. - You need voters to win, and Newt will have the conservative wing of the Gop sitting it out.

[mnehring]

..and a lot more will sit it out if Paul is the nominee. He has the highest negatives of the bunch.

[editor-surveyor]

I wasn’t pushing Paul. I was pointing out that there as many that know Newt as there are that are fooled by him.

He will leave us in the same shape as McCain did.

[shield]

Per Dr. Jack Wheeler on Newtie:

I am, of course, talking about Newt Gingrich. I am, quite frankly, in a state of shock at the stupidity of support for him. He is a mean, insufferable, arrogant, pompous Rockefeller Republican, an ethanol-subsidizing global-warming crony-capitalist ludicrously hypocritical pretend conservative.

Here is just the start, just a hint, of his anti-conservative actions (provided by a friend):

04/02/1987 - cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine
10/22/1991 - voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
03/--/1993 - voted for sending $1.6 billion in foreign aid to Russia.
1/27/1994 - supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N.
08/27/1995 - suggests that drug smuggling should carry a death sentence.
04/25/1996 - voted for the then single largest increase on federal education spending ($3.5 billion)
04/10/1995 - supported federal taxdollars being spent on abortions.
06/01/1996 - helped a Democrat switch parties in an attempt to defeat constitutionalist Ron Paul in the 1996 election.
09/25/1996 - introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
01/22/1997 - Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
11/29/2006 - said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism, called for a "serious debate about the 1st Amendment."
02/15/2007 - supports Bush's proposal for mandatory carbon caps.
09/28/2008 - says if in office, he would have reluctantly voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
09/30/2008 - releases his book A Contract with the Earth which embraces man-made global warming.
12/08/2008 - paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
03/31/2009 - says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
11/15/2010 - defends Romneycare
01/30/2011 - lobbies for ethanol subsidies.
01/30/2011 - suggests that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
02/13/2011 - criticizes Obama for sending less U.S. taxdollars to Egypt.
03/09/2011 - blames his infidelity to multiple wives on his passion for the country.
03/15/2011 - says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
03/19/2011 - has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (now $7.2T unfunded liability)
03/23/2011 - completely flip-flops on Libyan intervention in 16 days.
03/25/2011 - plans to sign as many as 200 executive orders on his first day as president.
04/25/2011 - admits he is a paid lobbyist for federal ethanol subsidies.
07/15/2011 - his poorly managed campaign is over $1 million in debt.
08/01/2011 - hires a company to create fake Twitters to appear as if had a following.
11/16/2011 - revealed he actually received $1.6 million lobbying for Freddie Mac, vs. his previously stated $300,000

This list could go on and on. Here's more. Further, he has no executive or private business experience whatever. Until he cashed in with lobbying contracts after he resigned from Congress in 1999, he never worked a day in the private sector. Like Zero, he taught at a state school (University of West Georgia) until becoming a professional politician (Congressman from Georgia 1979-1999). He is an ultimate Washington insider.