Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Commander-in-Chief" Debate Recap, Winners and Losers
The Iowa Republican ^ | November 13, 2011 | Kevin Hall

Posted on 11/13/2011 2:25:54 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

For the second time in four days, the GOP presidential candidates took the stage for a debate. This one focused exclusively on foreign policy and national security. The first hour aired live on the CBS network. The final half hour was only available online and the CBS feed was lousy for the first 15 minutes of that. So, most viewers only paid attention to the first hour. This recap covers the entire debate.

Here is a look at how each candidate fared, along with winners and losers:

Michele Bachmann: Once again, the Minnesota congresswoman was in command on the issues and offered plenty of substance. She also failed to stand out, again. Bachmann had a good line about Obama “allowing the ACLU to run the CIA”. Often ignored, she practically begged the moderators for time on two different occasions, but was shot down. Bachmann held her own, but did little to sway voters.

Herman Cain: Without the ability to use “9-9-9” as a crutch, Cain struggled. He provided his answers with a slow, methodical delivery, probably trying to avoid a gaffe. Much like Cain’s stances on social issues, some of his foreign policy answers were indecipherable.

Cain proclaimed, “I do not agree with torture. Period. However, I will trust the judgment of our military leaders to determine what is torture and what is not torture.” Huh?

Six months after officially declaring his candidacy, Cain is still giving the same non-answer on the war in Afghanistan. Cain called Yemen’s corrupt president “our friend”, and still believes we can somehow undermine Iran’s nuclear program by drilling for oil here. Cain received few applause breaks from a lively South Carolina crowd. It was not his best night.

Newt Gingrich: Once again, the former House Speaker commanded the stage better than anyone else. He provided strong, substantive issues. Gingrich projects an aura that he knows the issues better than anyone else. Probably because he does know better. It was another very good performance.

Jon Huntsman: Although I still believe Huntsman is running in the wrong party, this was a very good performance. Unfortunately for the former Utah governor, most GOP primary voters disagree with his stances. However, he provided strong arguments for his views, which include immediately pulling our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan and opposing waterboarding. If this were a general election campaign and Huntsman was in his rightful spot as the Democrat, he would have fared very well.

Ron Paul: The Texas congressman’s foreign policy stances are what prevent a lot of Republicans from seriously considering him. As expected, he disagreed with most of the candidates on stage. Paul gave a much better answer regarding Iran’s nuclear program than he did at the Ames debate in August. Although he still opposes going to war to prevent it, Paul said, “If you do, you get a declaration of war and you fight it and you win it.” I thought Paul did a good job presenting his arguments. It seemed like he had very few chances to speak, however.

Rick Perry: After the “Perry Plunge” on Wednesday, I thought his campaign was over. Now, I’m not so sure. This was Rick Perry’s best debate. He was relaxed and provided lots of substance. He scored with the audience by joking about Wednesday’s brain freeze.

Perry gave a terrific answer in regards to foreign aid. “The foreign aid budget in my administration is going to start at $0.” He later added that Pakistan doesn’t deserve any aid and stuck to his answer later in the debate when asked if his $0 policy would include Israel. Perry even got a compliment from Gingrich in regards to his answer. This might signal a rebirth in the Perry campaign.

Mitt Romney: The former Massachusetts governor was his usual polished self. Romney is well versed on every issue and has become an excellent debater. As the presumed frontrunner, Romney handled this debate very well.

Rick Santorum: The former Pennsylvania senator again showed he has a command of the issues. He even disagreed with Newt Gingrich in regards to how to handle Iran’s pending nuclear weapons, but the moderators did not allow the two to argue it out. Calling Pakistan “a friend” probably raised some eyebrows among GOP voters. Santorum was not given a lot of time to shine, which he desperately needs at this point in the campaign.

Overall Winner: Rick Perry. In the aftermath of Wednesday’s gaffe, we have seen a much more human side for Perry. He actually did well in that debate, except for the 53 second brain freeze. Saturday, Perry shined. While he might not have delivered the most style and substance, I believe he helped his campaign more than anyone else. That makes Perry the winner.

Overall Losers: CBS and Herman Cain. Cain avoided any major gaffes, but was clearly the least knowledgeable candidate on the stage. As for CBS, what kind of network only airs an hour of an hour and a half debate? Then encourages people to watch the rest on their website, but provides a feed that pauses every four seconds? Wait. I know the answer. It’s the same kind of network that tried to alter the 2004 presidential race with phony documents.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: debates; foreignpolicy; gopprimary; hermancain; msm; perryastroturfing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 next last
To: Netizen

So. The spammers do that on every Perry thread. It’s what they post that is spam. It’s nothing more than unsourced cut and paste tripe that gets posted every day on any thread that mentions Perry. It’s like they can’t help themselves.

Now, back to the topic.


181 posted on 11/13/2011 9:39:43 AM PST by CajunConservative ( Leadership. It is defined by action, not position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth

Given that this was first debate where Perry, held his own.....and being described as so much more relaxed and as well; ‘more on target’; cannot help but wonder if Adderol did not come to his rescue. Hope not ..though, personally; cannot help but wonder.


182 posted on 11/13/2011 9:48:09 AM PST by cricket (Stop the madness. . . Vote the KING out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

Herman Cain always answers the questions without a lot of embellishment.

His weakest point is foreign policy.

His strongest points are his ability to give this Country a Leader that inspires the Country to do great things to the benefit of all the people.

I think Herman Cain’s time has come.

GO HERMAN!


183 posted on 11/13/2011 10:03:08 AM PST by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: shield

Cain is inexperienced!
Watch this and see what I mean,

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/so-which-is-it-cain-defined-benefit-plan-or-premium-support/question-2267311/


184 posted on 11/13/2011 10:06:18 AM PST by indpndtguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: shield

my bad, I just posted at the wrong thread.


185 posted on 11/13/2011 10:08:26 AM PST by indpndtguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: cricket
Given that this was first debate where Perry, held his own.

I personally think he's only had 1 bad debate. That's not saying the others were great, b/c they weren't. There was his 2nd or 3rd debate where he just looked dead tired and out of it. The entire performance was bad. The other performances had enough small soundbites that overshadowed any other positive parts. Prime examples are the heartless comment, and the brain fart last week. Last week was a solid performance, minus the 50+ seconds. But, as is politics, it's what gets replayed on the news cycle that counts. He's a big boy, and I thought he handled the brain fart aftermath as best as he could, which was with humor. The McCain camp absolutely killed Palin after her brain fart with Couric. They just hoped that the whole incident would go away if they didn't respond to it, and the image stuck. And it hurt.

Perry's has a lot of work to do to repair perception, and I know that his campaign knows that. We'll see what happens over the next month and a half. If he handles the next debates like he did last night, it can't hurt him.

186 posted on 11/13/2011 10:12:14 AM PST by GOPyouth ("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

I really don’t know, we’d have to ask that *one* teacher and the local school board. I don’t think I’d recite the pledge.

However, it was not official State business at all. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/blaze-exclusive-tx-high-school-students-made-to-recite-mexican-national-anthem-pledge-of-allegiance/


187 posted on 11/13/2011 10:15:00 AM PST by hocndoc (WingRight.org Have mustard seed: Will use. Cut spending, cut spending, cut spending, now,now,now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

Newt said they don’t. I believe some courts have said that it is illegal, our guys still argue.


188 posted on 11/13/2011 10:16:19 AM PST by hocndoc (WingRight.org Have mustard seed: Will use. Cut spending, cut spending, cut spending, now,now,now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Netizen; Cincinatus' Wife

Calm down. CW said “Perry threads” while talking about a pattern. In fact, don’t you think the post CW complained about was without relevance to the conversation about last night’s debate?


189 posted on 11/13/2011 10:21:50 AM PST by hocndoc (WingRight.org Have mustard seed: Will use. Cut spending, cut spending, cut spending, now,now,now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Cincinatus' Wife; shield; devolve; ntnychik; casinva; All
Lol, it must irk you badly that Perry did so well in the debate Liz, bet you had a sleepless night...

And he's LIKEABLE, many on the live thread commented on how likeable he is. Your endless spamming of the same halftruths, that have been explained over and over, seems to be your only goal the past few months. It's odd........

 


190 posted on 11/13/2011 10:36:27 AM PST by potlatch (*snip*~ “Having the right to be angry doesn’t give one the right to be cruel. ~*snip*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc; altura; muawiyah

I was responding to this. Why are you bring up CW? Are altura and CW the same person?

To: muawiyah

CW was not objecting to your posting on this Perry thread.

She may have objected to your posting really stupid stuff, but she is too nice to say what she probably is thinking.

172 posted on Sunday, November 13, 2011 12:17:37 PM by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

alture said this is a Perry thread. It is NOT.


191 posted on 11/13/2011 10:39:06 AM PST by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet

He didn’t say Bachmann won. He listed the candidates in alphabetical order.


192 posted on 11/13/2011 10:56:55 AM PST by bigred08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

So it’s up to the judgment of the leaders involved since it’s obviously legally ambiguous.


193 posted on 11/13/2011 11:21:34 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska
Idiot ~ unless you clip bond coupons left to you by your grandparents you are NOT part of the ownership class.

They don't think you are, so you aren't.

194 posted on 11/13/2011 11:53:46 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

So, CW operates under just two names now?


195 posted on 11/13/2011 11:57:57 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Cain is not “winging it”.

Cain has a good grasp of policy and issues, if people would just take the time to learn about him instead of spouting liberal and RINO talking points:

http://www.thinkersvoice.com/content/cainscommentary
economicfreedomcoalition.com/press-opinion.asp


196 posted on 11/13/2011 12:02:27 PM PST by justsaynomore (http://teamcain.hermancain.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I’m not saying that! lol I’m just curious why my post to one poster elicited a reply regarding a different poster. :)


197 posted on 11/13/2011 12:11:28 PM PST by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

Could be someone is typing names in ~ or, spontaneous human combustion. One of those two I am sure.


198 posted on 11/13/2011 12:28:38 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Idiot ~ unless you clip bond coupons left to you by your grandparents you are NOT part of the ownership class. They don't think you are, so you aren't.

Thank you for your calm and thoughtful response.

If anyone disagrees with your opinion, they become and idiot.

You on the other hand are a just calm, reasonable jerk off.

You have no idea what I have or where it came from and all my grand parents gave me way more than bonds, they came to America and gave me opportunity.

Idiot indeed.

199 posted on 11/13/2011 12:34:06 PM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska
You became an "idiot" because you read the post as if it had a Marxist slant.

Learn to read English and maybe we can talk.

200 posted on 11/13/2011 12:44:41 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson