Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JustiaGate
The Examiner ^ | 10-20-2011 | Dianna Cotter

Posted on 10/20/2011 1:12:42 PM PDT by Danae

Someone was incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public; searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com which cite the only case in American history - Minor v. Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1's natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent.  In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a "native or natural-born citizen" as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain. 

In June 2008 no one was discussing Minor v. Happersett 88 US 162 (1875) with regard to Obama. In fact, those who were discussing the then Senator’s citizenship status had focused instead on his birth in Hawaii in a attempt to prove the future president was not born in the United States despite publication of the Senator’s short form computer generated Birth Certificate. It would not be until October of 2008 that Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility would be questioned as to his status as a dual citizen at the time of his birth.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barrydunham; birthcertificate; certifigate; elections; fraud; happersett; illegal; ineligible; justia; justiagate; minor; minorvhappersett; naturalborncitizen; obama; romancinghistory; scotus; soetoro; srnotacitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-289 next last
To: Spaulding; kristinn

Ping


61 posted on 10/20/2011 2:52:44 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Donofrio didn’t find or publish about it until October of 2008. He was one of the first as a matter of fact.


62 posted on 10/20/2011 2:55:50 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Semper911; Vickery2010

Do NOT confuse Native born and Natural Born. Go with the specific words of Minor v. Happersett. THAT IS THE LAW OF THE LAND which is in force right this instant.

We MUST stick to the law, otherwise we have nothing.


63 posted on 10/20/2011 2:57:52 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Danae

I *am* sticking to the law. I’m explaining YOUR quote, from Luria v. U.S. The specific words from the 1913 Supreme Court case.

Wherein the Supreme Court said that the difference between a “naturalized citizen” and a “native citizen” is only in Presidential eligibility.


64 posted on 10/20/2011 3:05:22 PM PDT by Vickery2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

They refused to allow you to be an examiner didn’t they?


65 posted on 10/20/2011 3:10:25 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Vickery2010

I included your name since I was sort of inserting myself into your conversation.

:)

Sorry for the misunderstanding!


66 posted on 10/20/2011 3:11:50 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Vickery is a hired obotroll and I don’t add obotrolls in the “to” box when referring to them. This is a serious issue, so many have showed up already to claim this is of no importance.


67 posted on 10/20/2011 3:16:34 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Danae
According to nndb: Born 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone, to military parents. The United States has never had sovereignty over any part of Panama, thus the 14th Amendment's words, "born or naturalized in the United States", do not apply. Congress passed a law on 4 August 1937 retroactively granting those born in the Canal Zone after 1904 US citizenship, nearly one year after McCain's birth. That law (50 Stat. 558, now codified as 8 USC § 1403) states: "Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States." It is thus certain the McCain is a US citizen, but his status as "natural born citizen" may be questioned.

While the record remains muddy, based on searching a number of Internet sites, it would seem that the Congressional law passed in 1937 would trump the citizenship issue but, as the citation notes, does leave the "natural born citizen" issue unclear.

8 USC Section 1403 states - " TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part I > § 1403 § 1403. Persons born in the Canal Zone or Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904:
(a) Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.
(b) Any person born in the Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States employed by the Government of the United States or by the Panama Railroad Company, or its successor in title, is declared to be a citizen of the United States."

68 posted on 10/20/2011 3:18:12 PM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

You fool no one. The only thing in question is your motive. Which I don’t care about.


69 posted on 10/20/2011 3:18:21 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Incredible article, Danae. Thank you so much for all of the effort that went into producing it. I posted it to my Facebook wall.


70 posted on 10/20/2011 3:19:56 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

S’okay. No harm, no foul.


71 posted on 10/20/2011 3:24:44 PM PDT by Vickery2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: Danae

bm


73 posted on 10/20/2011 3:36:11 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States

A Natural Born Citizen is a Citizen. A Citizen is NOT necessarily a Natural Born Citizen. The two are NOT the same. I am certainly not saying McCain isn't a citizen! Not even remotely. He isn't a Natural Born Citizen and that comes from Minor v. Happersett and the legal defination it created. It is why McCain didn't challenge Obama on it. He could not have stood up to the light of minor even with his shiney new Senate Resolution.
74 posted on 10/20/2011 3:53:29 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Thanks Windflier!

:)

Maybe I can get a good night’s sleep now. Well, I do have a whole lotta homework for school to to that I have ignored all week to get this done! Eeeeek! I have a 1 Star General teaching one of my classes too! And I have a paper due too! ACK! And I am SO burnt out.


75 posted on 10/20/2011 3:58:14 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Danae; little jeremiah; onyx; penelopesire; maggief; hoosiermama; SE Mom; Liz; rodguy911; ...

Political/US Constitution muckraking flashback,. It is NON-BINDING .. it is NOT a law.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Senators Introduce Resolution To Make Clear Senate’s Position On Candidate’s Status
Senators: McCain Is A ‘Natural Born Citizen’

Excerpt:

WASHINGTON (Thursday, April 10, 2008) Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) today introduced a resolution expressing the sense of the U.S. Senate that presidential candidate and current Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) is a ‚Äònatural born Citizen,’ as specified in the Constitution and eligible to run for President.

In February, The New York Times [a well-known liberal propaganda rag] published a report calling into question the legality of McCain’s presidential run. McCain was born to American citizens stationed on an American Naval base in the Panama Canal Zone. He has since served in the U.S. Navy, and, since 1983, has served in the U.S. Congress.

“Because he was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen,” said Leahy. “I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the Senate.”

*snip*

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself and Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

_______________

RESOLUTION

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13304http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13304


76 posted on 10/20/2011 4:04:58 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
The Constitution does NOT make a distinction between a “native citizen” or a “natural born citizen” AT ALL.

Article II:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

You are right that I typed it wrong. I meant to say a distinction between "citizen" and "natural born citizen."

Read Article II and you see them use both terms, making the distinction.

There is no way you can argue that "natural born citizen" isn't in the Constitution, nor that a distinction isn't made.

77 posted on 10/20/2011 4:10:51 PM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Danae; Vickery2010
Donofrio didn’t find or publish about it until October of 2008.

Okay.

78 posted on 10/20/2011 4:11:54 PM PDT by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Not only non-binding, but when held up to the light of Minor v Happersett, it fails in the law. Resolutions are not law.

I was not real happy about McCain as a candidate. But now we know why he was such a limp noodle about campaigning. He could not stand the scrutiny of Minor any more than Obama could. Though to be honest, Obama’s transgression is FAR worse. By far. With McCain there is some doubt because of the Canal Zone and what that means.

With Obama there is NONE.

None whatsoever.

Minor PROVES Obama is not and never was a Natural Born Citizen. The man should be removed from office IMMEDIATELY.

Justia... man. Whoever did that should be in a world of hurt.

79 posted on 10/20/2011 4:12:02 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Danae
McCain got a resolution from the Senate, and that does say something.

One thing the resolution said is that there was no way the Senate would question McCain's eligibility. I've always wondered why Obama didn't try to get a similar resolution at the same time. It seems to be a case of the dog that didn't bark. McCain's Senate Bill contains a little fib too in stating that he was born on a US Military base and not in Colon Hospital in sovereign Panama.

Very interesting article, thanks for posting it. I'll be interested in seeing how Justia is able to explain this away. Please let us know.

80 posted on 10/20/2011 4:19:40 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-289 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson