Hey Butter!
I have a comment on something you said:
“Kleon says he’s seen a Way Back Machine page showing that it happened elsewhere. He’s even posted a direct link that is supposed to take me to that page. But my computer won’t go to it. Apparently all this “evidence” is like the mythical unicorn that only appears to true believers. lol.”
I watched this whole thing develop. I literally watched these cases which Leo documents on his site be found, I saw them myself. Leo stated very clearly that it would disappear off the net the same way the first two cases in July did. So he screenshotted everything. I did a number myself, and I included in my article that the wayback machine would stop showing these pages as soon as the .txt robots from Justia could be written for them. We had hoped that Justia would come clean, and thie was their opportunity, Instead, they covered up again by trying to sweep it under the rug.
We knew that the Obots and others would go and say... oh this is a forgery. No. It isn’t. It is a deliberate tactic being used by Justia to try and make this go away.
It isn’t working. There is too much evidence. thus, obots etc are forced to attack the images, because the information IN the images is so complete and so dakmming they have no defense. If you can’t kill the message, kill the messenger right?
Well, I am a witness to all of it. That is why I wrote in Examiner the way I did. I KNOW what I saw and have complete confidance in what I saw.
Yes, I believe what you said about that. Kleon was claiming that the Minor v Happersett cases weren’t the ONLY ones where they did that so it must have just been some little formatting change they made and then coincidentally changed it back right after Donofrio pointed it out.
But now that we’ve seen that Waybackmachine is willing and able to manipulate their stuff to cover for Obama, that means that they could easily have changed a Wayback page to make it seem like the same phenomenon happened with other cases besides Minor v Happersett. That’s the way they have functioned with everything else: when somebody notices a discrepancy, quick, create a forgery that has the same discrepancy and then say, “Well, it must not be a discrepancy because it happened this other time too...”
For instance, they are STILL trying to claim that the BC’s were alphabetized a month at a time before being numbered at the end of the month - even after I’ve pointed out repeatedly that Okubo said they were numbered the same day they were received in their office except in very rare instances. They’ve come up with Waidelich’s BC and now this other one that WND had an article about - both trying to show that Obama’s number is not a discrepancy. But Okubo said what she said, so now we’ve just got 3 discrepancies instead of one.
I hope that makes sense. I’m about brain-dead right now. My co-worker has been in the hospital so I’ve been covering for him, at the same time as working on sewing a quilt for a wounded soldier (that’s supposed to be done by Veteran’s Day) and planning a youth-led worship service for All Saints Day. A lot of details and a lot of work. All stuff I love to do but sleep would be nice too. In the meantime I just hope my sleep-deprived mouth doesn’t say anything too stupid. lol