Yes, I believe what you said about that. Kleon was claiming that the Minor v Happersett cases weren’t the ONLY ones where they did that so it must have just been some little formatting change they made and then coincidentally changed it back right after Donofrio pointed it out.
But now that we’ve seen that Waybackmachine is willing and able to manipulate their stuff to cover for Obama, that means that they could easily have changed a Wayback page to make it seem like the same phenomenon happened with other cases besides Minor v Happersett. That’s the way they have functioned with everything else: when somebody notices a discrepancy, quick, create a forgery that has the same discrepancy and then say, “Well, it must not be a discrepancy because it happened this other time too...”
For instance, they are STILL trying to claim that the BC’s were alphabetized a month at a time before being numbered at the end of the month - even after I’ve pointed out repeatedly that Okubo said they were numbered the same day they were received in their office except in very rare instances. They’ve come up with Waidelich’s BC and now this other one that WND had an article about - both trying to show that Obama’s number is not a discrepancy. But Okubo said what she said, so now we’ve just got 3 discrepancies instead of one.
I hope that makes sense. I’m about brain-dead right now. My co-worker has been in the hospital so I’ve been covering for him, at the same time as working on sewing a quilt for a wounded soldier (that’s supposed to be done by Veteran’s Day) and planning a youth-led worship service for All Saints Day. A lot of details and a lot of work. All stuff I love to do but sleep would be nice too. In the meantime I just hope my sleep-deprived mouth doesn’t say anything too stupid. lol
I don’t know that the Wayback Machine has anything to do with it. Justia can insert .txt robots on their end to exclude certain specific URLs from being readable at Wayback.
It wasn’t some little bit of formatting either. There was specific text removed, citation numbers got changed, the case name got removed, there was a LOT going on there, and no “ .* “ in regex can do that. the * includes or excludes only the characters associated with it, its a qualifier, and it has to have some thing to qualify, in this case it was “Minor v. Happersett” and the specific text of other cases which made a variety of statements which didn’t have that case name in it also got removed. That is no accident.
I don’t know the other history you are speaking about with regards to Hawaii. So I can’t really address that. Internet.org has been around since the internet began, thats 1986, back when it was a university communication system.