Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: cruise_missile
There seems to be a difference in pixelation (resolution). The top signature seems to have more pixels in it. Is that the problem?

Yes, the varying pixelation is sort of prima facie evidence of fraud.

The problem I see is that the dems have marched out their “experts” and have said this is the real deal.

I really haven't heard any experts defend this second birth certificate except to blow smoke. They'll say things like the software did it. Ask them to point to even ONE single document posted to the internet before April of this year that exhibits similar multiple pixelation and they will either tell you they are too busy and you should look, or they will just go away and pretend you never asked.

Forgeries take years in the courts. Years!

Maybe like Gulliver's description of a suit over the ownership of a cow, it would take a long time. But this is an obvious fraud. We're talking minutes here.

My opinion. It is fake. But Joe six pack is not going to understand this. Joe six-pack understands $5/gallon gas.

I'm not sure what your point is. Stupid people won't understand so we should instead make a mountain out of a molehill? $5/gal gas cost the average driver $3000 a year. And gas was never free, so maybe it costs $2000 more a year now. It hard to think of any tax that costs less, and at least one gets something for the gas money.

Anyway, I'm not so negative about the average guy's ability to understand. Yes, if they get lied to over and over they'll tend to believe it. But if someone comes along and tells them the truth, watch out.

ML/NJ

91 posted on 05/11/2011 4:05:12 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj
Its been days now. No one with any standing has come forward.

No coverage of this.

If you have the media on your side.
You can get away with anything.

My comment about Joe six-pack. Joe understands gas prices. This is over their head. This forgery is for political geeks like us. Besides the administration has already marched out several experts saying this is the real deal. Who is going to believe this now?

BTW. I listened to an interview with Frank Abignale (Catch Me If You Can). He said in relation to this. In order to prove it is a forgery or not. You need to take a sample of the ink off the document to examine it. Particularly around the rubber stamp area.

You have better odds getting to take a sample from the Shroud of Turin than you do of taking a sample from the this “document”. The courts aren't going to let it happen.

93 posted on 05/11/2011 5:18:59 PM PDT by cruise_missile (Palin: More woman than Michelle. More man than Barack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson