No coverage of this.
If you have the media on your side.
You can get away with anything.
My comment about Joe six-pack. Joe understands gas prices. This is over their head. This forgery is for political geeks like us. Besides the administration has already marched out several experts saying this is the real deal. Who is going to believe this now?
BTW. I listened to an interview with Frank Abignale (Catch Me If You Can). He said in relation to this. In order to prove it is a forgery or not. You need to take a sample of the ink off the document to examine it. Particularly around the rubber stamp area.
You have better odds getting to take a sample from the Shroud of Turin than you do of taking a sample from the this “document”. The courts aren't going to let it happen.
I guess he's not such an expert then. Ink samples are the sort of thing that might have to be done with a good forgery. For example, if this Dr. Sinclair had died in 1959 no ink sample would be necessary. And none is needed here either. It's an obvious forgery.
As for Administration "experts," they don't count for much. And I pay pretty close attention but cannot recall a single document expert who has given even qualified support for its authenticity.
ML/NJ