. . . . Check out # 280.
Thanks, Fred Nerks.
.
Posted on 05/09/2011 8:35:43 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Evidence continues to mount that President Obama was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, raising concerns over his presidential eligibility.
Obama's American mother, Ann Dunham, separated from her first husband, Barack Obama Sr., in 1963 when the president was 2 years old. Dunham and Obama Sr. are reported to have later divorced.
In Hawaii, Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian, in 1965 and moved to Indonesia in October 1967.
Divorce documents filed in Hawaii on Aug. 20, 1980, refer to Obama as the "child" of both Soetoro and Dunham, indicating a possible adoption in the U.S.
Jerome Corsi’s new book, "Where’s the Birth Certificate?", is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore
The divorce records state: "The parties have 1 child(ren) below age 18 and 1 child(ren) above 18 but still dependent on the parties for education."
The records further identify the "oldest child" as "in university."
"Mother resides with youngest child in 4-bedroom house provided by mother's employer," continues the divorce documents.
The documents identify the minor as Obama's stepsister, Maya Soetoro.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Can you show me one, just one, that has not been tampered with???
Where have you been, under a rock?
No but you have apparently, while a plethora of people have said he was born in Kenya, even a "Grandma" and other family members say they were there when SAD pooped him out of the womb!!!
. . . . Check out # 280.
Thanks, Fred Nerks.
.
This is the most compelling thing that I’ve seen to date.
I guess too, that it seems the consensus that they threw this together blatantly thinking that through the media and others they can disprove by mocking the accuser.
Like I said, the BC is so obviously faked that even I can now understand this.
Sure looks that way.
In the typed memo, do you think the name that is blocked out is Anna, Stan Ann or someone else? Or could it have been a male that he was having trouble with? Who is the one who left the U.S.? Or is Anna the one in the Phillipines? And in the handwritten notes, Miss Frost feels that he may be married to someone in Cambridge?
Brain exploding time.
ON MARCH 20, 1964, the 'divorce' is final.
AND ON MARCH 5, 1964 SAD married LOLO SOETORO?
But on another passport document, the date and place of marriage is now changed:
. . . . Uh, oh, - how to explain # 287 ?
Thanks, Fred Nerks.
.
I see exactly what you see...so all I can offer is what common sense tells me. I think who he was having trouble with was probably the parents of the girl
Or could it have been a male that he was having trouble with? Who is the one who left the U.S.? Or is Anna the one in the Phillipines? And in the handwritten notes, Miss Frost feels that he may be married to someone in Cambridge?
One who returned to the Phillipines, a US citizen, and another one he had taken up with in Cambridge?
Ok, I try to keep up with all this info, but I’m really confused now. I don’t remember SAD being in the Philippines, maybe I missed that. Trying to read the handwritten portion, it looks like they think he is also married to someone at Cambridge?
who said Stanley Ann Dunham was in the Phillipines?
The Kenyan said ‘the wife from whom he was separated was in the Phillipines’.
WE DON’T KNOW HER NAME
Looks like the SP’s are all on a dinner break.
Executive Summary Re NBC Defined in Constitution Plus 4 SCOTUS Cases
Dinner break? I noticed that happens every time they are presented with something that isn’t in their script.
The Kenyan said ‘the wife from whom he was separated was in the Phillipines’.
WE DON’T KNOW HER NAME
OK, but since the passport apps were just posted, it looks like she was or just applied for a passport to go.
And what you present is DEFINITELY NOT in their script!!
It’s not going to be pretty for Obama. Nor should it be.
Swiftboating coming later this week from Jeri Corsi at WND who was in Hawaii last week investigating some loose ends. It involves the fact that Obama’s birth narrative is a complete fabrication, and the media and others have facilitated a fraud.
Congratulations obots. Remember when people were questioning how the German people could have ever been so foolish to have elected Hitler in the first place (who was an Austrian)? It was because they believed in “Hope and Change”.
Looks like the orders are to change the subject until axelgreasy can come up with a different lie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.