Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos
Did that answer your question?

No. I stated that the your interpreted "requirement" was effective the moment Jesus related it to Nicodemus.(John 3:5). Why would John be baptizing and to what were the disciples baptizing?

3,717 posted on 06/20/2011 2:21:06 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3713 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
I stated that the your interpreted "requirement" was effective the moment Jesus related it to Nicodemus.(John 3:5).

Firstly, it's Christ's statement that He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. Mark 16:16 no human logic -- only if one denies what Christ clearly said that belief and baptism is needed to be saved that is human logic

Secondly, John 3:5 tells of what is needed in the New Covenant. The Old Covenant given to Noah was sealed with a sacrifice.

So too the New Covenant was sealed with the purest sacrifice -- Jesus Christ's death on the cross

FROM THE RESURRECTION the New Covenant begins.

3,731 posted on 06/21/2011 12:29:28 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3717 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson