Posted on 04/27/2011 11:25:17 AM PDT by Mr. K
Well, if we're using nordyke as a reference then that settles that. Thanks.
“The hospital name angle is moot.”
Yes that was My point , the hospital name is not an issue as the hospital had the same name until 1978 when it was merged with the childrens hospital and changed to kapiolano medical center.
Juan Williams right now is on Shep’s show saying it’s all racial...
Questions:
1. Are these blotches indicative of something being removed from the BC? (Back in my software days, I "whited out" unwanted parts of images, so I know it can be done.)
2. If so, what was removed?
3. Was an official seal was removed from the lower left corner where the empty box is? If not, why is the "APR 25 2011" stamp floating in space by itself? Why would the short form have an official seal while the long form does not? If the official seal is removed, is the document legally viable?
Indeed.
/not that I am a birth certificate nor pdf expert
Well if that is the case then the Nordyke twins BC is fake too.
That's what happens when you don't press down the shift key on your manual typewriter all the way, as shown by the annoying number of red circles on my papers in typing class. The typist likely hit caps lock to type the name.
Another possible angle:
“Nothing to see here - this is the sort of output you’d expect to find if you use ‘Optimize Scanned PDF’ in Acrobat. It slices the large image up to save on bandwidth.”
I’ve not experienced this myself so I’ll take this comment I saw over at NRO at face value and ask if any of you all have a similar experience.
I’m not sure how it explains the clipping paths though...
I really don’t think that matters. It’s possible back then that they just put down the information given to them by Gramps or Toot... oops sorry, Stanley Ann. /s
Too late. We know the game! :-)
Does anyone have a copy of the PDF issued this morning?
Besides the layers, the file itself will have embedded HIDDEN information that you can not see inside photoshop.
It contains the codes that describe the document and the layers and tells the software how to display the image on screen.
The codes and symobls and hidden text that you dont see on-screen also contain file data that might be interesting
Anyone have a binary file viewer? Let’s see what some of that hidden binary data says
IN that case, the Nordyke twins’ certificates must be fake, too, because they list the exact same name for the hospital.
Well, what does THAT mean?!
I don't know why the OCR failed on a few letters. Maybe it's an older version, the settings were jacked up, or there were goblins in the scanner. But the layered images opened in Illustrator look like what happens when OCR is turned on.
Why does the background have artifacts from the text? If this is a truly doctored Photoshop job then why isn't the green background completely static and free of any semblance of typed or written letters? That's what backgrounds look like when Acrobat tries to separate the different layers including the OCR layer.
Do the same for the mothers signature. The digital blocks for "(Stanley) Ann D" are one size the blocks for "unham Obabma" are again half the width and height.
Check out the signture of the local registrar. The overall signature is the larger blocks except the seond charater which has the half size blocks.
This can't happen in a single document. The document is composed of material from sources of different resolution.
If you have photoshop, import it at 1200 dpi and the the photoshop grid and addtional magnification will make the differences even more apparent.
On Obama’s (alleged) certificate, why are the O’s in “Oahu” (two instances) raised and the O’s in “OBAMA” (three times) not raised?
a proper long form would be a scan. a scan is a single image. there are no layers.
since there are layers, this pdf is a generated file.
obviously, they couldn’t trust just anyone and had to use people in their inner circle to generate the pdf. the person they chose just didn’t understand how to remove the layers so it would not be recoverable.
obvious forgery.
as he is putting this out as a valid document... he is attempting to commit fraud.
Thanks!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.