Didn’t much care for the options.
I opted for Pawlenty as the least bad.
While I like Palin, I think she doesn’t have much chance owing to the the tarring and feathering she has undergone by the media.
The media is going to tar and feather any Republican who they feel has the remotest chance of beating Obama. Why do you think they attack Sarah, even though she has never said she's seeking the office?
Answer: She is that big of a threat to him.
You can’t tar and feather Palin. A campaign will expose the media’s lies. Let’s choose the candidate we want rather than the ones the media approves of.
You are letting the media in your head.That is the only way they can win.
She is winning this poll, same as she would win an election if people would just quit giving a damn what the media says.
Didn’t much care for the options.
I opted for Pawlenty as the least bad.
While I like Palin, I think she doesn’t have much chance owing to the the tarring and feathering she has undergone by the media.
Pawlenty for me, too; for the same reasons you state.
Put down the Kristol ball and step away from the computer. You miss a most obvious point: the unfair and relentless "tarring and feathering" Sarah Palin has undergone has only served to toughen her, NOT weaken her.
If your argument were remotely correct, you are yielding the idea that the media will forever pick our candidates, which they did in 2008, giving us John McLame.
You would do well to turn off the TV and go to facebook and READ Sarah Palin's positions. Don't worry, Bill Kristol and Karl Rove will still be there when you get back.
Let me guess, Obama will be hard to beat, too.
Nice try; better go tell Cass Sunstein he's not getting his money's worth out of you.
Cheers!