Skip to comments.
Arizona will decide whether Obama gets reelected or not
examiner.com ^
| 01/24/11
| Gil Guignat
Posted on 01/24/2011 10:10:04 AM PST by SGW
New information has come to the fore that explains in detail why President Obama simply does not want to show his birth certificate. The controversy has to do with the idea that the Presidents legal name on his birth certificate is Barry Soetoro not Barrack Obama. It also has to do with the idea that all kinds of white lies were told on his college transcripts so he could qualify for student aide as a foreign student under the name Barry Soetoro. This is a story about potential fraud on a grand scale which is why the President does not want to show his birth certificate.
Back in April of 2010 the Arizona legislature had crafted a law requiring that presidential candidates present their birth certificates and supporting documents proving their eligibility for the 2012 presidential elections and beyond. The argument was that the Congress simply did not do its job in vetting President Obama and the Arizona legislature would make sure this would never happen again. At the time the president of the Arizona senate did not bring the bill up for discussion and therefore stalled the bill. Had it come up for a vote the bill would have passed.
Imagine if during the 2012 elections Obama refuses to show his birth certificate.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 2012election; arizona; barrysoetoro; certifigate; eligibility; naturalborncitizen; obama; schoolaidfraud; soetoro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
There are as I understand it other states now crafting eligibility statutes for the 2012 elections. It would be really ironic if Arizona in the end had the last laugh if Obama loses reelection because he did not want to show his long form birth certificate and that caused millions of voters not trust him anymore.
1
posted on
01/24/2011 10:10:07 AM PST
by
SGW
To: SGW
OK, that’s it - I’m calling him Barry from now on - that’s it, just Barry - no last name because it’s unverified.
2
posted on
01/24/2011 10:15:20 AM PST
by
libertarian27
(Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
To: libertarian27
He can’t run for President now.
3
posted on
01/24/2011 10:16:31 AM PST
by
scooby321
To: SGW
But but shouldn’t there still be an original birth certificate with the name Barack Obama on it?
4
posted on
01/24/2011 10:18:32 AM PST
by
MulberryDraw
(Turn off the EPA, FCC, Federal Dept. of Education, ...)
To: SGW
I honestly don’t think it will matter. Not changing his name legally was just an oversite. Plus McCain will say he’s the legal president. And Rush, Hannity and O’Rielly will say it’s not a big deal.
5
posted on
01/24/2011 10:19:11 AM PST
by
Terry Mross
(I voted for McCain and WASTED my vote.)
To: SGW
6
posted on
01/24/2011 10:19:25 AM PST
by
unkus
To: SGW
So an initiative for the RNC would be to lobby other states for a similar law. With the Republican supermajority in Texas, that could be the next state to pass such a statute.
Perry would no doubt sign something that would improve his chances.
7
posted on
01/24/2011 10:24:33 AM PST
by
Regulator
(Watch Out! Americans are on the March! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
To: Terry Mross
If that is the case then there are no longer any requirements to be president.
It will not be up to McCain to decide. It will be a metter of whether he wants to comply with the state statutes. that is where the issue will be.
8
posted on
01/24/2011 10:25:18 AM PST
by
SGW
To: SGW
I thought Texas was one of the others, but do not quote me on that. All states should have that law!
To: SGW
“It will not be up to McCain to decide.”
Terrific. Juan wasn’t eligible to run either. Being born in Panama McStain is not a Natural Born Citizen, either.
10
posted on
01/24/2011 10:29:28 AM PST
by
Bizhvywt
To: blondee123
It is not so much what the punditry will say. It is about millions of voters watching how hard Obama will fight to hide the birth certificate. Millions will wonder what this guy has to hide.
11
posted on
01/24/2011 10:30:29 AM PST
by
SGW
To: SGW; azishot; LucyT; Fantasywriter; warsaw44; ColdOne; Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; GQuagmire; ...
Ping..................
Arizona will decide whether Obama gets reelected or not
Go Arizona, GOOOOOOOOOO!
0b0z0's crushed ego will be the end of him! Of Course, the communists' talking points will be :
Yeah, of course, the bigots in AZ are made at His Heinous for suing AZ on behalf of the poooooooooor immigrants! Remember, he feels their pain because hes one of them! LOL!
The point is, would he show AZ his stealth BC? Could UberCommie find/forge it in time?
Interesting to see the avalanche of red states following suit!
12
posted on
01/24/2011 10:30:41 AM PST
by
melancholy
(Papa Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist)
To: SGW
The only way his name could be Barry Soetoro is if he was adopted by his mother’s second husband.
There would also be a notation on the long form BC that would simply say “amended”.
13
posted on
01/24/2011 10:31:12 AM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: SGW
They had their chance in 2008, but because of their stupid election law allowed the candidates to “self-attest”. That’s right, sign a document and send it in stating that they were indeed constitutionally eligible for the office without verification from any state authority.
To: MulberryDraw
It would be sealed and replaced with the new one and the father’s name would be Lolo Soetoro.
15
posted on
01/24/2011 10:32:09 AM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: libertarian27
Im calling him Barry from now on I refer to the dufe as 'Bork Obunga'.
To: SGW
To: SGW
from The Daily Pen website...
To: MulberryDraw
“But but shouldnt there still be an original birth certificate with the name Barack Obama on it?”
Yes as I read the HI statute (correct me if I’m wrong) if you are adopted the state issues a corrected BC with the new name and then seals the old BC in the records.
I still think if there is no long form BC then BHO just was not born in HI. What are the odds that he was the only kid born in HI in 1961 that for some reason did not get a BC? Its a reach.
So, either there is no Long form BC or the state is lying and covering up something. This should all have been hashed out in 2008. The GOP fell down on the job bigtime. McCain never should have shown his long form BC until Barry showed his.
19
posted on
01/24/2011 10:36:36 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Vendome; MulberryDraw
It would be sealed and replaced with the new one and the fathers name would be Lolo Soetoro.
.......................................
And as a result Obama and Robert Gibbs and David Axelrod would be guilty of falsifying an official government document (COLB’s) that listed Barack Hussein Obama as the father.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson