Posted on 01/13/2011 10:16:28 AM PST by DontTreadOnMe2009
CBS News allowed the following comment to be published on its website, following an article about Obama’s visit to Arizona yesterday:
... Who were the doctor(s) and nurse(s) at Kapi`Olani that delivered Barack? My ex-wife worked at the hospital and I understand the records at Kapi’Olani are impeccable. Where are the foot prints? What public records exist that can even demonstrate that Mrs. Obama was even at Kapi’Olani on the day of Barack’s birth? Talk at Kapi`Olani, would have been unabashed, the city of Honolulu at the time very racist towards black people.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
They'll try anything to legitimize Obama but they ultimately fail.
Heeeere trollee trolleee trolleeee...... come on, boy.....
Oh gee, when Laz is trolling the troll he’s in trouble now LoL.
That’s fierce!
You’re making a mistake. Your getting it excited!
I have no idea why Sen. Inhofe or any other legislators introduce their bills regarding NBC. I suggest you ask them.
The real motive behind SR 511 was the fact McCain was born in Panamanian Territory and the resolution was a vehicle to show the sense of the Senate that McCain was a NBC. Traditionally Resolutions are passed by one house of Congress and not the other. Because McCain was a Senator, I suspect that was a motivating factor in the Senate and not the House passing the resolution.
When a party ‘hints’ at a filing that means it is not required to do so. That is why I said previously it is my educated guess that there has not been proper service at this time. If there had been proper service, then the Government would not be hinting but rather filing, otherwise there would have already been a default judgment in the case. My guess, knowing Federal Judges, is that this Judge has told the U.S. Attorney’s office to file something, so she can dismiss this case and get it off her docket. Federal Judges generally dislike frivolous lawsuits cluttering up their dockets. I seriously doubt this case is going anywhere.It looks like it will be dismissed on Tuesday, we will see.
I cited the previous examples as precedent to show others with similiar facts served, and nobody objected. Doesn't that mean anything to birthers. I assure you the precedence is an argument that SCOTUS will find somewhat persuasive. It is not evidence that Obama is ineligible to be POTUS. Your logic in this post is an excellent example why every birther law suit has gone down in flames.
Perhaps my reputation for eating the children of trolls, precedes me.
Hey dingbat lawyer. Spiro Agnew was born to American parentS and on US soil and therefore he was a Natural Born Citizen. His father was naturalized about 1910.
Yeah, and like having the Greek vote was key to Nixon getting elected.
Isn’t it considered good form for new Freepers to branch out, and express views on more than one topic? Trolls—especially Fogbow Obots—zero in on one thing [eligibility] and never comment on anything else.
But the world, and FR, are full of topics.
DADT
Abortion
Donald Young
The list goes on.
You never learned that it’s a sin to lie, apparently.
Gee what is that Dud? I'm sure you are misinterpreting the grandfather clause. The short answers is that the Founding Fathers could not be natural born US citizens because the US Constitution or the US of A did not exist when they were born, and their parents were foreigners before the time of the adoption of the US Constitution.
You can eat TNTNT. ...You’re the man. :-)
I am very confident and sure of the above. If you want I'll wager a $100.00 contribution to the freepathon on whether Scotus grants cert in this lastest birther judicial quest.
This is better than New Year’s and a birthday party.
Did you see I pinged you to *ucktooth’s comment on JR’s thread today?
ROTFLOL
Stop it, man—you’re scaring the troll to death! He’s pulled back inside his shell like a tortoise, hoping if he stays motionless for long enough, you’ll get bored and look elsewhere for your bloody dinner.
Pray, Counselor: You have either that one posting that identifies I am a birther, or a retraction?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.