Yes, I do agree that State AG office is where the investigation should occur. The question to me is more of a financial issue. I would estimate that an investigation and prosecution of the BC issue will cost several million dollars. I know here in Texas we are facing a 20 billion dollar deficit and all departments have been ordered to cut 10% of their budget. The case will have to be brought in a state which can afford the expenditure and the AG can fade the heat from the press.
A state that could investigate this might have its cost offset by the undoing of Obamacare, for instance.
Arizona is paying for border security, the high cost of trying to get the Department of Injustice to actually obey one of the few mandates that the Constitution gives the federal government: securing the states against foreign invasion.
They shouldn’t have to pay to protect the country from foreign invasion of the White House. Somebody else needs to step up to the plate.
Virginia seems to be working on the Obamacare thing; why couldn’t a different state spend money on the eligibility thing rather than duplicating VA’s efforts on Obamacare? It’s ultimately going to be resolved by SCOTUS anyway.
One thing that could/should be done is something that would require Obama to reimburse the taxpayers for all his legal defense if it turns out that money has been spent on what Obama knew was deliberate crimes against the Constitution and the American people. The money that the taxpayers spent on continuing the hoax in the legal system should go to reimburse the state that ends up securing justice for the nation.
Is there anything like that in effect right now, or is there any way to get such a thing done? How is it that Sarah Palin could be run broke by lawsuits over nothing, and the taxpayers are paying mega-bucks to ensure that Obama can keep spitting on our Constitution and the valid concerns of the American public? If Obama is not lawfully POTUS, then what would legally justify the US spending money to defend him in a criminal case? If it was a CRIMINAL case (as it would be if an AG investigated and prosecuted the case) wouldn’t Obama have to pay for it himself - which might help keep costs down?