Replies

A state that could investigate this might have its cost offset by the undoing of Obamacare, for instance.

Arizona is paying for border security, the high cost of trying to get the Department of Injustice to actually obey one of the few mandates that the Constitution gives the federal government: securing the states against foreign invasion.

They shouldn’t have to pay to protect the country from foreign invasion of the White House. Somebody else needs to step up to the plate.

Virginia seems to be working on the Obamacare thing; why couldn’t a different state spend money on the eligibility thing rather than duplicating VA’s efforts on Obamacare? It’s ultimately going to be resolved by SCOTUS anyway.

One thing that could/should be done is something that would require Obama to reimburse the taxpayers for all his legal defense if it turns out that money has been spent on what Obama knew was deliberate crimes against the Constitution and the American people. The money that the taxpayers spent on continuing the hoax in the legal system should go to reimburse the state that ends up securing justice for the nation.

Is there anything like that in effect right now, or is there any way to get such a thing done? How is it that Sarah Palin could be run broke by lawsuits over nothing, and the taxpayers are paying mega-bucks to ensure that Obama can keep spitting on our Constitution and the valid concerns of the American public? If Obama is not lawfully POTUS, then what would legally justify the US spending money to defend him in a criminal case? If it was a CRIMINAL case (as it would be if an AG investigated and prosecuted the case) wouldn’t Obama have to pay for it himself - which might help keep costs down?

I do think that if your proposal becomes law it will be immediately challenged by the Justice Department on Constitutional grounds, such as Arizona was sued for their illegal alien law. It would probably end up with SCOTUS, and I am not sure you will like the outcome. But at least you will hopefully have a definitve SCOTUS answer, if they take the case. need to celebrate, Happy New Years!!!

Some interesting and established facts :

1. The BC from Mombasa has never been discredited. (This document has been public for almost two years, and still stands. It is now in the halls of congress, in the hands of every Senator. No one has been charged with fraud.)

2. Rahm Emanual did go to Kenya before Obama became president.

3. Kenyan Parliament members started to sound off , and immediately Obama dodged the press near the Kenyan Embassy for an hour or so.

4. Aid to Kenya has increased, significantly.

5. We have never seen an American BC.

6. His wife brags that Kenya is his home country.

7. Election official from Hawaii states there is no American BC.

8. Obama imprisons a man rather than produce a BC. This is the most damning fact to date.

Facts are starting to accumulate on their own. We may have seen his BC, and it may be in every ones pocket in DC.

I meant to reply to this post before I got sidetracked last night for New Years. Yes if a criminal action is brought against Obama, he will have to use his own money to defend himself. Remember the legal defense fund set by Clinton for his perjury in the Paula Jones case. I don't believe that will bring down the expense of the investigation and prosecution. IIRC, The Starr investigation cost between 60 & 70 million dollars.Even you cut that in half, it is still quite an expense for a state to take on with an iffy chance of success. Unfortunately, in today's economic environment, Obama can probably out raise and outspend any state that tries this maneuver.