Posted on 12/18/2010 9:04:14 PM PST by massmike
We are now stuck with sexual deviants serving openly in the U.S. military because of turncoat Republican senators ... Had the cloture vote failed, we would still have sane moral and sexual standards governing military personnel policy. But sadly those days are gone, perhaps forever.
...
The armies of other nations have allowed gays to serve openly in the military. The reason they could afford to do this is simple: they could allow homosexuals to serve in their military because we didn’t allow them to serve in ours.
They knew they could count on the strength, might, power, and cohesion of the U.S. military to intervene whenever and wherever necessary to pull their fannies out of the fire and squash the forces of tyranny wherever they raised their ugly heads around the world.
Those days are now gone. We will no longer be able to bail out these other emasculated armies because ours will now be feminized and neutered beyond repair, and there is no one left to bail us out. We have been permanently weakened as a military and as a nation by these misguided and treasonous Republican senators, and the world is now a more dangerous place for us all.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightwingwatch.org ...
I am wondering if the military is going to cover up the increased, how should we say, the expected interaction between the perverted ones and the rest.
SledgeCS
The immoral gays now have the upper hand in all law suits and discriminatory suits. That is what the result of this will be: The dismissal of the homophobes—the men who spurn the advances of their homosexual commanders. The Christians will be “haters” and the Bible will be hate speech.
That leaves an atheist, pagan paradigm in the army—much like the ancient Greek and Roman models where pederasty is always a main part since homosexuals were perverted in their youth and fixated on young boys and young men...that is when they got their sexual thrill that they need to recreate.
An immoral military is exceptionally dangerous to their own people. General Patton was sickened by the actions of the atheist Russian military who were/are devoid of morality so are easily capable of torturing and killing men, women and children. Same with the homosexual brownshirts. They were especially vicious because only Christianity gives dignity and worth to all human beings, even the unborn.
The Christian paradigm will be eliminated from the US military....That Christian paradigm has been driven out of Europe and so they are in nihilation mode....we are too as we strip away the Christian paradigm (Bible) which made this country awesome and the military the most moral in the history of mankind who gave their lives to protect women and children.
Now we are trying to destroy the concept of God—that he had a purpose in the design of men and women and they are different. The Natural Law of this country forbids us from perverting our laws to defy God’s design, since our rights come from Him. This repeal is the most unconstitutional thing this congress has done because it takes away the freedom to be a Christian in the public square.
You haven’t studied the ancient Greek and Roman cultures. Where homosexuality becomes promoted in cultures, it flourishes. What always goes along with it is pederasty. Their sexual identities were perverted while growing up and it is just a lack of moral sexual restraint. Orgies will be the norm in the military just like it was in Greek and Rome when sexual immorality was promoted.
Homosexuals were the dominate numbers in the SS Nazi army. They used the boys in the Hitler Youth. They founded “boy scout” troops. Homosexuality is just no sexual morality....the idea of Marx....everyone is the same although in homosexual societies, women became second class citizens and children were sacrificed or used for sex. Always becomes a sick, ugly mess where children are so confused about sexual roles. They model what they see and the homosexual agitprop has been going 24/7....all lies about the deviant, degrading culture of death.
Please cite your source
Please cite your source
Mmm, I’d probably tie the guy down, take a pocket knife, and cut off his nuts. But I would draw the line at taking a life.
I guess I don’t have the mindset to serve in the military, although when those Muzzie beheading videos surfaced, I felt so angry that I wanted to take the ragheads and strangle them. They should really do what the British did in the 19th century, which is wrap Islamofascists in pigskins and shoot them, since they think they won’t get to heaven that way.
In fact, I’m not sure why a gay man would want to serve in the military anyway. In fact, if you’re gay, you should consider yourself lucky that you’re not expected to go out there and get blown up or shot at. While the straight guys are putting their lives on the line, you can stay home and have all the fun you want with your gay buddies.
Spot on.
Every time someone wants to disobey an order, they will claim to be gay, and will claim discrimination.
No one will give orders to an openly gay man, especially the career types, for fear of the fallout on their own heads.
Being gay will now be a shield, to do whatever, and whenever you want to, without having to worry about your superiors disciplining you in any way shape or form.
This is what was intended, and this is what they got.
It was a way to destroy the military, so it can be rebuilt from a liberal standpoint, thereby giving the liberals control of the armed forces in a decade or so, when they will use them against American citizens. There was no way our current military would turn against us at the orders of a socialist, but a new military, created from liberalism is just what they needed.
Good bye America as we know it.
I hope I am wrong—but I don’t think this will work out well. The beating will start, deaths even, it will be a dark day indeed. Lets hope its not like that.
OK I will tell this story again, but this time I’m gonna save the text so I don’t have to type it again and again.
When I was in in the early 90s a friend was a brigade surgeon for the 193rd Inf. Brigade. He was assigned to an investigation of a private they had discovered was “gay”. They interviewed the other men in the platoon who had been in the “woods” with the guy for a while to “see what the effect was on morale”. My friend told me he almost dropped his jaw off his face but the all “didn’t see him as a problem, he gave great blow jobs.”
Is it a problem?
Are you kidding? I was doing military sick call for ALL of the 90s and let me tell you a sizable fraction of AM sick call was single mothers needing a “sick slip” because their child care plan for the day had fallen apart. The military has been doing “social engineering” for a long time.
No kidding. And this is going to multiply THAT PROBLEM several times. Do you support the homosexual agenda?
It is a problem. Look, we are not going to support the homosexual agenda on FR. If you wish to go that route, do it somewhere else.
I think it is a BIG problem.
Plus it is a lifestyle that takes from 8 to 20 years off a person’s life expectany.
Place all homosexuals to one unit document results.Wonder what the murder rate would be?.
From the column:
“I hereby call upon the new Congress to never certify that the military is ready to implement repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and instead pass strong laws protecting the rights of Christian troops (especially chaplains) to openly speak their opinions about what the Bible calls sin, to refuse common showers, sleeping quarters and ‘social re-education’ without repercussion, guaranteeing religious freedom even outside of chapel services. If free speech and free religion rights of Christian chaplains and troops are not protected, then the military is not ready to certify or implement repeal, and will quickly begin to persecute good people of Christian conscience.”
Seems someone didn’t read the directive that supporters of DADT aren’t welcome here on FR .....
“The only difference now is they don’t have to hide the fact they’re gay.”
Do you really think the flaming ones were really able to hide the fact that they’re homosexuals anyway?
So then, what exactly does this new found freedom to flaunt it consist of? Merely putting an X in a box on the enlistment form? Leering and ogling in the showers (as straight men would do if the showers and sleeping quarters were co-ed)?
I grew up with my father still having battle fatigue from years of combat during WWII. War is hell, unlike the sanitized version that Hollywood gives us. There isn’t time or energy for Gay Parades in feather boas and tutus in the military and especially not in war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.