Austrian MP Ewald Stadler

You Tube ^ | December 3rd 2010

[Islaminaction]

Austrian MP Ewald Stadler

From: TheRealNewsGB | December 02, 2010  | 3,165 views

 

Austrian MP Ewald Stadler addresses the Turkish ambassador and exposes his contradictions concerning integration.If there were more politicians like Mr Stadler in Europe,islam would never have been allowed to gain the ground it has.

...   

[DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis]

Thanks for posting! :)

[50mm]

Thanks for the clarification Jim.

This works well for the normal blogger, but as you know a new class of blog pimp has emerged that directly threatens the survival of FR. I’m talking about the type who grabs the work of others, sometimes from sources on the FR copyright list, pastes the work in a blog and then pimps the blog on FR while claiming ownership by putting their name as author. They usually are titled something like “VIDEO: LOOK WHAT I FOUND.”

I’ve seen several of these careless blog pimps warned multiple times and yet they persist in putting FR at risk to get hits for their blogs. Why not get more aggressive with these types before FR ends up with more lawsuits?

[Velveeta]

This all worked more or less to a certain degree without too much friction until the non-commenting, short-excerpting, long-complaining blog pimp was born.

I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.

That was my point all along. Christopher with Islaminaction posts here, comments here and definitely has useful information.

[Velveeta]

I’m a nurse.
Do you need CPR or something?

[humblegunner]

Comprehension FAIL:

I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog

We’re not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog

And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog.

[humblegunner]

Why not get more aggressive with these types before FR ends up with more lawsuits?

I'm on it. ;-)

[Velveeta]

There’s no comprehension failure, Humblegunner.

Christopher participated in the threads AT FR.

I’m pleased to have Jim’s clarification for how he wants HIS house to run.

Now, get busy scoping out those bloggers who post and run with no intention of participating at FR.

[humblegunner]

You intentionally fail to see the pimping aspect.

One more time, just because I like shells-n-cheese:

blog material should be posted to our bloggers forum and it would be best if you do not excerpt your own material

I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog

Please TRY to grasp the meaning of this.

[Velveeta]

I. Get. It.

You’re failing to see the non-commenting - one hit poster aspect.

There’s a difference and Jim has clarified.

Whatever Jim has deemed acceptable is the OVERLORD law.

[thackney]

Thank you, Jim

[TheOldLady]

Please see my Post #553. I haven’t been wrong much about these things.

Trolls. Don’t feed ‘em. It’s pointless and annoying.

[50mm]

Well 50mm, speak up.

Woof! Woof!

[humblegunner]

Sigh.

You’re failing to see the non-commenting - one hit poster aspect.

No. I see that some pimps, Mr. Inaction among them, post and
interact on their own threads. Yes, I see that. Sure do, yep.

The fact remains, and I urge you to show evidence to the contrary,
that Mr. Inaction excerpts his stolen material in order to get blog hits.

Mr. Inaction USES FR as an advertising platform for his/her blog.

Further, Mr. Inaction whines incessantly about any criticism
of this fact, and likely cries to the authorities about it as well.

So, given the above facts as a baseline, we can know that:

A. Mr. Inaction is a whiner
B. Mr. Inaction is a blogpimp
C. Mr. Inaction steals material
D. Mr. Inaction sucks donkey butt

He steals and/or digs up good info. It's useful.
Why he chooses to waste this in an effort to gain blog hits is a mystery.

Mr. Inaction could be an asset here if only she would knock off the pimping.

~THE OVERLORD~ has spoken.

[Eaker]

That is a keeper!

[Allegra]

Great post - thanks for making the concept so clear that even pimpiest blogger will have difficulty distorting it. :)

[ChrisBoundsTX]

Thank you for the clarification Jim.

[Allegra]

Christopher participated in the threads AT FR.

Yes, but if one dares to disagree or even add a little input to any of the blog content, he wastes no time slinging personal insults and acting like a spoiled, self-centered child.

He regales anyone who will listen with his tales of bravery, self-importance and vast knowledge - so vast that there isn't another on the planet who could possibly know as much he does.

Not an attractive trait at all.

[humblegunner]

He regales anyone who will listen with his tales of bravery, self-importance and vast knowledge - so vast that there isn't another on the planet who could possibly know as much he does.

So.. you're hot for him, huh?

[humblegunner]

Trolls. Don’t feed ‘em. It’s pointless and annoying.

But they're cute when they jump up and nip at the bait.

[paulycy]

Do you believe us now?