Posted on 11/21/2010 9:36:36 PM PST by STARWISE
Looking back on what was right, what was wrong, and where we may go from here
Since our first interview titled The President Is Losing It, to the last interview, He Aint No Democrat, the tone of Insider has emerged as seemingly less calculated, more genuine, yet also more frantic to see some semblance of good come from all of this Insider talk. Whether or not that good will eventually result, remains to be seen.
I make no secret of my considerable dissatisfaction with the Obama White House, and the Democratic Party as a whole. That being said, I have known good Democrats, and far less than capable or honest Republicans. Insider on the other hand, while dismayed at the path his political party has taken in recent years, remains hopeful that same party will resolve itself to a far stronger and more unified future.
Their fear though, that the party may never recover from its grand folly of nominating, and then electing, Barack Obama as President of the United States, remains palpable. Insider blames no one more than themselves for that folly.
It is, as they have stated, the greatest mistake of their professional life. I wonder of the many millions who voted for Barack Obama, how many among them now share that same feeling of remorse that Insider so willingly admits to?
As with any anonymous source, there always remains and rightfully so, the question of legitimacy of the information being disseminated. Is this real, or a figment of imagination?
The truth most likely resides somewhere in between for Insider appears to say the most when speaking the least, and their intentions not always easily distinguished. A perfect example of this was Insiders seemingly offhand comment at the end of a message where they briefly stated for me to watch for an upcoming media reports on Hillary Clinton being offered the position of Vice President in the Obama White House.
Such speculation was rampant in 2008, mentioned off and on in 2009, but was heard rarely in 2010. I payed it little mind, had almost forgot its mention in fact, until, just 48 hours after that interview was published, it was the leading story on both Fox and CNN, as well as making the front page of the Drudge Report and various other significant blog sites.
Insiders before it broke call was impressive. Impressive to have seen something so specific, be proven so accurate so quickly. Were they showing off just a bit? I do believe they were.
Then we have Insidersoft-repeated indications that the big money donors for the Democratic Party were considering pulling the plug on Obama.
*snip*
And what of the certification file allegedly mentioned by Nancy Pelosi?
Does such a file actually exist? Was it Pelosis knowledge of the certification process that has allowed her to ultimately remain in power despite overseeing historical losses against Democrats during the midterm elections?
Or does Pelosi have knowledge of something else? While Insider has repeatedly described any mention of Barack Obamas eligibility status as birther nonsense, they have also initiated that subject themselves on occasion. Why?
If the issue is so silly, so beyond the realm of possibility, why bring it up at all? Perhaps as Insider has also hinted at, there does appear to be something there, but that something might prove so debilitating to the nations political process that it leaves Insider not wanting to play any part in such a damaging outcome?.
Of this I am certain Insider knows far more on this subject than they have yet indicated.
Rest @ link
From the comments, re: the birth certificate
“The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed,
for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad.
The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies,but would be ashamed to tell big lies. Adolph Hitler
There’s a difference between being suspicious and being bloodthirsty. Healthy suspicion is good, but when you start to believe people like Anthony G. Martin, you’re just getting bamboozled. Here’s a guy who’s trying to earn a living making up lies about Democrats and most of you ate it up. You believed it because you wanted it to be true. Just like people believed that electing Obama could change this country over night.
You know, if we’re going to fix this country, we’re going to have to work together.
I’m not a troll, I’m not here to pick fights or shove anything in anybody’s face. I’m here because posters here brought me up in conversation. I was writing an article about Ulsterman and was accused by people here of being a white house operative, which is obviously not the case.
Anyway, I’m just an aspiring journalist and I write about politics and digital media. The threads here were very helpful in the process of writing my story and I thank you and will continue to use this forum as a resource.
I’m asking you all, not as an aspiring journalist, but as a person, to be careful of jumping to conclusions. The internet is full of liars and hacks, and Ulsterman (or Anthony G. Martin) is one of them. Just because you want something to be true doesn’t make it so. Have a good night and please don’t think I’m trying to start a flame war because that isn’t my intention.
It is obvious we have been had by someone, so for that I say Thank You.
Regarding your motives:
1.Do you know who Ulsterman is & wanted to stop the farce?
2.Do you know who the insider is & wanted to protect his reputation?
3. Are you a dem protecting obie?
4. Are you a conservative interested in truth?
Just trying to figure out where you fit in the big picture. :-)
Although all of what you say is true. No one can deny that the series of articles is a Clinton push. It is not a theory it is an obvious fact.You’re correct Ulster Man’s politics are irrelevant in his game.
So... in summary... a fake, who is making money (recognition), playing games mixed with politics. The Clinton’s will try like the dickens to move on up and corrupt again. Chicago politics is a large political scheme with many players.
LOL you just created the Clinton's campaign slogan.
Work together? I flipped through the ED show last night on TV and left the show on long enough to see the talking points are OBAMA HAD BEST NOT CAVE to tax relief for the rich. The GOP are millionaires that don't give a crap about the middle class... blah blah blah. Guess what... the democratic line of; they feel our pain ain't workin no more as this country goes to hell caring more about paying Obama's slush funds and making Soro's happy with all of the democrat global incentives of we are the world communism.
Hi, ulsterman. Enjoying your five minutes of fame? Ha!
Find my post where I say that. You came on here with a mouthful!
What leads you to believe Ulster Man is playing games? Are you from hillbuzz?
I mean no harm nor want to attack but am following your lead can't we just have a conversation?
The good thing about being open minded is that my own opinion is subject to change as new information emerges. He'll be around tomorrow and he'll use his real freeper name. Not sure who, but prolly someone we'd all know & "love"
Regarding the rumors of the Clintons saving the democratic party...
Reading Hillary Rodhams hidden thesis
Clinton White House asked Wellesley College to close off access
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17388372/ns/politics-decision_08
For Clinton and Obama, a Common Ideological Touchstone
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/24/AR2007032401152.html
Saul Alinsky
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_Alinsky
http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/318.html
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm
People searched your name and nothing came up. Nada, nothing, zero.
So, anyone can claim they are anything.
Maybe you’re Ulsterman; maybe you’re the “insider”, maybe there is no “insider”.
What I do know is that 0bastard is a fiend, a usurper, the worse “president” the US has ever had, he is a psychopath, nutcase, homosexual, muslim loving, commie criminal and fraud. Whether the Ulsterman is fake, real, or a mixture; I don’t care.
0bastard is a real honest to goodness evil man who wants to detsroy the US, that is fact.
And you? I have no clue, and really no interest.
Just who are "we"? And not sure what you mean by "fix", either.
...the tone of Insider has emerged as seemingly less calculated, more genuine, yet also more frantic to see some semblance of good come from all of this Insider "talk".Thanks DMDW2SS. Pulitzers don't come easily -- one has to make up loads of stuff to get one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.