Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Missile: Chinese Cyberwar or DOD ‘Accident’?
http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2010/11/california-missile-chinese-cyberwar-or-dod-accident/ ^ | 10/14/10

Posted on 11/14/2010 12:18:43 PM PST by roses of sharon

When KCBS aired the news helicopter footage of a mystery missile launch last Monday off the coast of southern California the ‘expert’ most quoted by the press, GlobalSecurities.org Director John Pike. It was Pike’s ‘optical illusion’ which got the most press. Another quote from Pike which got far less press, this statement from Pike during the 36 hour time period the DOD took to come up with the ‘most likely an aircraft’ explanation:

Pike said he didn’t understand why the military had not recognized the contrail of an aircraft. “The Air Force must … understand how contrails are formed,” he said. “Why they can’t get some major out to belabor the obvious, I don’t know.”

The military’s response, 36 hours after the event, an ‘illusion’?

Based on the news reports we’ve read related to the Pentagon and Chinese hackers, the questions of,

If Chinese hackers were responsible for the missile launch, would it have been construed by the DOD as an act of ‘cyberwar’ by China? A cyberwar act which occurred while the President of the United States was overseas in the Far East?

If Chinese hackers were responsible for a U.S. submarine ‘accidentally’ firing a missile, would the DOD admit it to the press, the American public, and, the Chinese government? Our military admitting Chinese military hackers had successfully hacked into the U.S. Dept. of Defense computer and fired one of our missiles?

If the missile was ‘accidentally’ fired by the U.S. military, could be there reasons the military doesn’t want the public to know?

In case you’re still debating whether the object videotaped off the coast of California last Monday was a missile or an aircraft the news a Three Star General, retired General Tom McInerney, is ‘absolutely certain that was not an aircraft’. The report from the Dept. of Defense the ‘missile’ was ‘most likely an aircraft’. ‘Most likely’, not a definitive answer from the DOD.

General McInerney, guest commentator on Sean Hannity’s FOX News show:

‘First of all I do not agree with the assertion, Sean, and your question is we should get a definitive answer, you’re absolutely correct. Look, this is not an airplane because of the plume and the way you see that plume, airplanes do not con (contrail) at sea level or at 5000 like that. I spent 35 years flying fighters and I have never seen an airplane con like that. That is a missile, it was launched from a submarine and you can see it go through a correction course and then it gets a very smooth trajectory, meaning that the guidance system is now kicked in, it’s going about 45 degrees away from you that why you’re not seeing a lot of vertical velocity.’

Sean Hannity: General, are you a 100% certain?

General McInerney: Sean, I’ve watched that film ten times, I’ve watched 15 other Trident films, SM-3′s, standard missile 3′s, and T-Lan launchers, I am absolutely certain that that is not a an aircraft.

While none of the Kings’ horses and men from the Dept. of Defense showed up to explain what the object was–the DOD sent out an email the object was ‘most likely an aircraft’–at least two of the King’s former horses and men showed up to claim the object was a missile, retired General McInerney and former Deputy of Defense Robert Ellsworth. An MIT professor of science, technology and international security, Theodore Postel, sent an email to the press stating the DOD hadn’t come up with a ‘plausible explanation’ and ‘convincing analysis’ of the ‘observed event’.

But Theodore Postol, a professor of science, technology and international security at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is not yet convinced. The Pentagon, he wrote in an e-mail, has provided no detailed information to support the aircraft claim. “One of their jobs is to provide air surveillance for the country, and they should be able to provide a convincing analysis supported by data for their conclusion,” said Postol, who furnished photographs of the mystery contrail along with remarkably similar pictures of solid-propellant missile launches. “I do not know what to think at this point,” he said, “but one thing is for sure, the Pentagon has not provided a plausible explanation of the observed event.”

In case you haven’t heard, three weeks ago the report from the Wall Street Journal the Air Force ‘lost communication’ for 45 minutes with 50 nuclear missiles. The March 2008 report from the LA Times, Chinese hacking worries Pentagon, NPR’s 2005 report, Pentagon Faces Computer Security Problems, the April 2009, Wall Street Journal report, Computer Spies Breach Fighter-Jet Project, and, the September 2007, Times Online report, China’s cyber army is preparing to march on America, says Pentagon.

Five years ago NPR reported Chinese hackers had made ’80,000 attempts’ to hack the Pentagon’s 5 million computers.

NPR:

Mr. ALLEN PALLER (SANS Institute): In one evening, at about 10:23 at night Pacific time, they found vulnerabilities in the US Army Information Systems Engineering Command at Ft. Huachuca, Arizona. Three hours later, they found the same hole in computers at the Defense Information Systems Agency in Arlington. A little more than two hours later, they hit the Naval Ocean Systems Center(ph), a Defense Department installation in San Diego. And an hour and a half later, they hit the United States Army Space & Strategic Defense installation in Huntsville.

O’HARA: Cyberanalysts who followed the investigation of Tighten Reign say that among the massive amounts of data that the hackers penetrated were detailed specifications on the Mars lander as well as information about satellite and missile technology and about US troop deployments. One of the original investigators of Tighten Reign, who asked not to be identified to preserve his job, confirms that account. Allen Paller of the SANS Institute says the damage was serious.

September 8, 2007, The Times Online:

Chinese military hackers have prepared a detailed plan to disable America’s aircraft battle carrier fleet with a devastating cyber attack, according to a Pentagon report obtained by The Times.

The blueprint for such an assault, drawn up by two hackers working for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), is part of an aggressive push by Beijing to achieve “electronic dominance” over each of its global rivals by 2050, particularly the US, Britain, Russia and South Korea.

China’s ambitions extend to crippling an enemy’s financial, military and communications capabilities early in a conflict, according to military documents and generals’ speeches that are being analysed by US intelligence officials. Describing what is in effect a new arms race, a Pentagon assessment states that China’s military regards offensive computer operations as “critical to seize the initiative” in the first stage of a war.

March 4, 2008, LA Times, Chinese hacking worries Pentagon:

WASHINGTON — China in the last year has developed ways to infiltrate and manipulate computer networks around the world in what U.S. defense officials conclude is a new and potentially dangerous military capability, according to a Pentagon report issued Monday.

Computer network intrusions at the Pentagon and other U.S. agencies, think tanks and government contractors last year “appeared to originate” in China, according to the report.

April 2009, Wall Street Journal, Computer Spies Breach Fighter-Jet Project:

WASHINGTON — Computer spies have broken into the Pentagon’s $300 billion Joint Strike Fighter project — the Defense Department’s costliest weapons program ever — according to current and former government officials familiar with the attacks.

Similar incidents have also breached the Air Force’s air-traffic-control system in recent months, these people say. In the case of the fighter-jet program, the intruders were able to copy and siphon off several terabytes of data related to design and electronics systems, officials say, potentially making it easier to defend against the craft.

The next report, an incident which occurred three weeks ago, the ’45 minutes’ nuclear warheads, 50 Minutemen III Intercontinental ballistic missiles , ‘went offline’.

The Atlantic:

On Saturday morning, according to people briefed on what happened, a squadron of ICBMs suddenly dropped down into what’s known as “LF Down” status, meaning that the missileers in their bunkers could no longer communicate with the missiles themselves. LF Down status also means that various security protocols built into the missile delivery system, like intrusion alarms and warhead separation alarms, were offline. In LF Down status, the missiles are still technically launch-able, but they can only be controlled by an airborne command and control platform like the Boeing E-6 NAOC “Kneecap” aircraft, E-4B NAOC aircraft or perhaps the TACAMO fleet, which is primarily used to communicate with nuclear submarines. Had the country been placed on a higher state of nuclear alert, those platforms would be operating automatically because the frequencies used to transmit nuclear codes would be interfacing with separate systems, according to officials.

On October 27th, the report of ‘No Foul Play’.

The Indy Channel:

CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Work has begun to try to replicate an electronics glitch and determine what disrupted communication between 50 nuclear missiles and a launch control center at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, a U.S. Air Force official said Wednesday.

Teams from F.E. Warren and Hill Air Force Base in Utah think they’ve isolated the faulty part where the problem occurred, said Lt. Col. John Thomas, spokesman for the U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command.

“It could be the part, it could be the way that it was installed, it could be the way that it was queried,” Thomas said.

And,

The suspected problem part is small enough to hold in your hand, Thomas said.

“That’s where our primary weight of effort is. But we are also not ruling anything out and we are looking at anything that may have contributed to it,” he said.

One wonders if part of the investigation involved ruling out Chinese hackers?

California Missile Launch, Act of Chinese Cyberwar or DOD Accident?

September 6, 3007, Washington Post, In Error, B-52 Flew Over U.S. With Nuclear-Armed Missiles:

An Air Force B-52 bomber flew across the central United States last week with six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads that were mistakenly attached to the airplane’s wing, defense officials said yesterday.

The Stratofortress bomber, based at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota, was transporting a dozen Advanced Cruise Missiles to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana on Aug. 30. But crews inadvertently loaded half of them with nuclear warheads attached.

Air Force officials said the warheads were not activated and at no time posed a threat to the public. But a timeline of the episode supplied by the Air Force yesterday to House and Senate lawmakers indicated that the missiles in question sat on a runway in Louisiana for nearly 10 hours before workers noticed that the nuclear warheads were inside.

The incident occurred August 30, 2007. The press didn’t report the incident until September 6th.

What’s important to note about the California missile incident is the both the initial response from the DOD and the non-definitive explanation after a 36-hour ‘investigation’, the ‘most likely an aircraft’ account.

CNN:

Col. Dave Lapan, a spokesman for the Pentagon, said later Tuesday that while there is no evidence that the contrail was left by a missile the department is still investigating.

No Defense Department units reported launches at the time. The North American Aerospace Defense Command and the U.S. Northern Command did not report any foreign missile launches off the California coast, Lapan added. Regardless, there was no threat to the United States, he said.

……

Lapan said that various agencies are trying to find out what happened.

“I don’t know specifically what they are all doing. I just know they have been pinged and that we are talking to the FAA, we are talking to other parts of the U.S. government. We are trying to do everything we can to figure out if anybody has any knowledge of what this event may have been,” Lapan said in off-camera comments to journalists.

“So far we have come up empty,” he added.

The response from the DOD, an email which didn’t state definitively the object was an aircraft, didn’t state what type of aircraft it was, or the actual flight of the aircraft.

FOX News:

“With all the information that we have gathered over the last day and a half about this condensation trail off the coast of southern California on Monday night, both within the DoD and other U.S. government agencies, we have no information to suggest this was anything other than a contrail caused by an aircraft,” said Col. David Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman.

“As stated yesterday, NORAD and USNORTHCOM determined that there was no threat to the U.S. homeland.”

Lapan said that in the mind of the DoD this case is closed.

Lapan said the government looked at lots of data sources other than the CBS news tape. He would not get into the details of what those data sources were, but said that evidence helped determine this was most likely an aircraft. But most importantly, it was the response from all other government agencies saying they did not launch anything that convinced them this was likely an aircraft.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: californiamissile; contrail; jetcontrail; missilemystery; mysterymissile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Yet another point of view!

But an interesting history of news reports of past Chinese hacking.

1 posted on 11/14/2010 12:18:47 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

bkmk


2 posted on 11/14/2010 12:26:24 PM PST by quickquiver (No, means N O.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
OK. I confess. It was me.


3 posted on 11/14/2010 12:32:46 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

I’m not sure I’m ready to buy the Chinese hacker story but there are sure a bunch of coincidences here.

The Minuteman missile outage is really puzzling to me, as I used to live near FE Warren AFB where this happened. I’ve toured the launch control facility and they told us there were multiple REDUNDANT lines of communication, in other words, cutting a single cable could not cause such an outage. The AF hasn’t given a detailed explanation but saying that they could not access 5 flights of 10 missiles each just doesn’t square with what I understood about how redundant these installations are.

How many years ago would we have been at DEFCON 4 with SAC bombers in the air over less than this? Today we worry about gays rights...


4 posted on 11/14/2010 12:33:28 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

If you want to parse it in “Clintonese” you might want to note that technically speaking, anything that moves through the air is an aircraft, so if the DoD and Obama-types want to claim a missile counts as an aircraft, they would be right.

I don’t know enough about airplanes or missiles to judge, but I trust an Air Force Lt.Gen. to know what he is talking about.


5 posted on 11/14/2010 12:36:10 PM PST by Ronin (Add sufficient applied thrust and pigs fly just fine. However, don't ask about the flying monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
It is easier to believe that a Chinese sub launched one 35 miles off the cost than one of ours did it.
6 posted on 11/14/2010 12:42:19 PM PST by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7; roses of sharon

ping


7 posted on 11/14/2010 12:43:02 PM PST by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

Have it on good background that the US Navy has stepped-up patrols off the Cali coast. That might discount the hacker theory.


8 posted on 11/14/2010 12:43:30 PM PST by CARTOUCHE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Unless chicoms have a way of communicating with the computers on US boomers while submerged, I doubt hacking is involved. Missile launches still follow Cold War protocols of two key launches. I believe a more likely scenario is a Chicom boomer conducting a test launch drill but failing to follow protocols which resulted in a real launch of an unarmed missile.

I think of the scene from the Bedford Incident when weapons officer James MacArthur, overstressed from 24 hours at GQ hears Captain Richard Widmark say the phrase fire one in while speaking to former U Boat skipper Eric Portman, and understands the phrase as orders to "Fire One" and launches an ASROC at a nuclear armed Soviet sub.

9 posted on 11/14/2010 12:44:58 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

I can’t believe this was a sub launched missile from a foreign navy. If it was, stock up on canned food and ammo and head for the hills.


10 posted on 11/14/2010 12:52:50 PM PST by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

If it wasn’t a Chinese missile, or a Russian missile, or a Korean missile, it has to have temped all of them to see what they can get away with. My guess is that we are far more vulnerable to all sorts of attacks than Washington wants us to know. All that tax money, all the wars, all the aggravation at airports, and an enemy can hit us anytime they want, a nuke from a sub, in a packing container at one of our ports, or smuggled across the Mexican border in a bale of marijuana. Meanwhile, Obamao is out there apologizing to all of our enemies. All the damage they can do to us, and none of it is equal to what the enemy within is doing.


11 posted on 11/14/2010 12:55:48 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
It must have been that same Chinese mini-sub which destroyed the oil platform in the Gulf. ;-)
12 posted on 11/14/2010 12:57:44 PM PST by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

If this was a missile, where did it go?

Where did the boosters, which should separate and drop away go?

In the video, is the missile going up or down?

How comes there’s no burning exhaust plume?


13 posted on 11/14/2010 1:00:03 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

What’s hard to believe is that we can land men on the moon and develop the technology to land spacecraft on Mars but we can’t find out what the he!! this thing was in our sky? Either the Government doesn’t want panic or they made a big mistake.


14 posted on 11/14/2010 1:04:36 PM PST by jerseyrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallis
This whole thing stinks like air force one joyriding around NYC.
Damage control to cover Obama' butt?
15 posted on 11/14/2010 1:07:23 PM PST by MaxMax (Conservatism isn't a party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CARTOUCHE
Have it on good background that the US Navy has stepped-up patrols off the Cali coast. That might discount the hacker theory.

Could discredit the 'airplane contrail' theory...

16 posted on 11/14/2010 1:09:48 PM PST by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

If it was an aircraft, why isn’t this contrail or plume replicated everyday around the same time this past week? The helicopter news reporter saw an anamoly, and that is what he took footage of. If it is to show off some new capability of the military, do you think our government would be speaking publicly about it (pictures are worth a thousand words). Or maybe the timing was to allow some foreign governments to witness this.


17 posted on 11/14/2010 1:10:12 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: roses of sharon

bookmark


19 posted on 11/14/2010 1:11:25 PM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

If a US SLBM was launched, where did the nuc tip missile go????? Same with a nuc tip sub cruise missile. It takes off and lands somewhere with a mushroom cloud. Every earthquake monitor along the west coast would be kicking live. So far no indications of explosion. Furthermore major universities have ocean sonar networks for ocean and marine studies. Any water missile launch will also be recorded and detected. If it was a missile, a possible jihadist demo of a manportable SAM shot from a merchant ship???? I think that is more plausible then huge missiles fired from Chicom or US subs.


20 posted on 11/14/2010 1:14:55 PM PST by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson