Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals Now Want Their Own Sarah Palin?
The Constitution Club ^ | Sunday, August 29, 2010 | The Hairy Beast

Posted on 08/29/2010 11:26:50 AM PDT by Mongeaux

Hard on the heels of Sarah Palin’s stellar speech at yesterday’s D.C. rally, Feministas Anna Holmes and Rebecca Traister have published an Op-ed in today’s New York Times bemoaning the left’s lack of a similar charismatic female leader. It is a stunning admission of political failure, or it would be if they were talking about anything other than Feminism, which hasn’t chalked up a single genuine victory since the 70′s.

Palin is a political Dreadnought – she’s withstood two years of constant assault from the left and yet refuses to sink. Libs have thrown their entire arsenal at her but she continues on, even picking up speed. She’s now on the verge of appropriating one of their most cherished issues – Women’s Rights – and it’s driving them crazy.

That Feminism came into being at all is proof it was needed, but its impending appropriation by Conservatives shows how badly the left bungled it. Holmes and Traister recognize mistakes were made, but the lay the blame entirely at the feet of the left, citing the raw deal Hillary Clinton got in the primaries:

But the sad truth is that Democrats often prefer their women fulfilling similarly diminutive models for behavior. Consider how Hillary Clinton has been treated, at times, by those in her own party: Democratic leaders never really celebrated Mrs. Clinton’s nation-altering place in history as the first female candidate to get so close to a major party’s presidential nomination. Indeed, she is most appreciated when she plays well with others in the Senate or the State Department; when she behaves like a fierce competitor, she is compared to Glenn Close’s bunny-boiling virago from “Fatal Attraction.”

Progressives, they tell us, aren’t feminist enough. Progressives only like women pols who are non-confrontational and “play well with others”. This is probably true, but it also shows why the right is on the verge of hijacking the Women’s Rights movement. Conservatives don’t mind strong women (like Palin) who fight for their beliefs and are willing to confront opponents. Does that make us more Feminist than the left? Maybe so - since Palin’s appearance on the political scene the libs have thrown one misogynistic Grand Mal seizure after another, criticizing her in most unfeminist ways. She’s a bad mother because she’s leaving her kids to run a campaign. She’s stupid because she’s hawt and dresses nice. All this anti-woman (or anti wrong-kind-of-woman) rhetoric makes conservatives look feminist by default.

Nobody should be surprised the left has failed to live up to the feminist ideal; feminism itself was born out of frustration with the libs, when female members of student radical groups rebelled because the boys put them in the role of Hippie USO; fetching coffee and dispensing Bong Hits and BJ’s as needed. Has anything really changed? One could argue that by the end of the 70′s, Feminism devolved into just another lefty interest group lined up with others under the Progressive banner to be trotted out when the (male) leaders needed to torpedo conservative enemies like Clarence Thomas. Feminism wasn’t about moving women forward, it was about pushing liberalism forward. And if the girls played nice they’d get the scraps.

Politics, like Nature abhors a vacuum. Leave a void and somebody’s bound to step in to fill it. But where did the void come from? The authors of this piece lay the blame on everybody but themselves. The Generals and their fellow soldiers have failed them. But nowhere is there the slightest suggestion that maybe feminists failed themselves. Attacking the Patriarchy wasn’t enough – they had to attack their own as well. The movement that presumes to speak for all women really only speaks for certain kinds of women. Those who don’t live up (or down) to that ideal are worse than on their own – they’re targets. Anita Hill? Sexual harassment victim. Monica Lewinsky? Bimbo hussy. Hillary Clinton? Victim. Sarah Palin? Villain.

Will the Progressives ever get their own Sarah Palin? Unlikely.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: KansasGirl

Got the hots for little Ellis, do ya? What about Anderson Cooper? He’s another snotty little girl with white hair.


41 posted on 08/29/2010 11:51:56 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

I suggested Johnny Edwards because, unlike the lib women, he IS a pretty “woman.”


42 posted on 08/29/2010 11:54:24 AM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux
Will the Progressives ever get their own Sarah Palin? Unlikely.

(Politically)progressive women come across as being shrews and the kind of woman most men try to avoid. (The term b*llbuster comes to mind).

Palin is the kind of women to whom men are attracted, not only because of her physical beauty, but mainly because she is feminine, while being genuine at the same time.
43 posted on 08/29/2010 11:54:40 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux
Liberals Now Want Their Own Sarah Palin?

Never gonna happen. WHY?

They'll never produce anyone, man or woman, who TELLS the TRUTH!

44 posted on 08/29/2010 11:55:32 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That’s exactly what I do! He is unwatchable and I want watch him.


45 posted on 08/29/2010 11:56:47 AM PDT by KansasGirl (No, I do not proofread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl; cripplecreek

want = won’t!


46 posted on 08/29/2010 11:57:21 AM PDT by KansasGirl (No, I do not proofread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux
Feministas Anna Holmes and Rebecca Traister have published an Op-ed in today’s New York Times bemoaning the left’s lack of a similar charismatic female leader.

They've got one.

He's in the White House.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

47 posted on 08/29/2010 11:57:47 AM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Rachel Maddow is a woman? News to me!


48 posted on 08/29/2010 12:00:58 PM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux

Chrissy Matthews?


49 posted on 08/29/2010 12:02:40 PM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux

“fetching coffee and dispensing Bong Hits and BJ’s as needed”

Yup.


50 posted on 08/29/2010 12:02:45 PM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Do yew have a lisance fir the minkey?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo
"But the sad truth is that Democrats often prefer their women fulfilling similarly diminutive models for behavior."

...just like the islamics....

two peas in a pod....

Standy......

DING Ding ding....

Incoming tag line replacing:

Mr. President, no golfball exploded because of your amazing power and strength - you hit a duck egg,

51 posted on 08/29/2010 12:03:38 PM PDT by spokeshave (Islamics and Democrats unite to cut off Adam Smith's invisible hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux

One must take this into the equation, being that the Islamic influence from POTUS on down and its further infiltration of politics in America just what indeed is the power of a woman gaining position in the eyes and laws of Islamic Sharia?

Islam will only tolerate a woman in politics if she his their tool to dominance.

And Sarah Palin will not kneel to Islam.


52 posted on 08/29/2010 12:06:02 PM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Dreadnought caught my eye, too—how appropriate!


53 posted on 08/29/2010 12:08:39 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Old is right! Geez, I saw her on some cable talk show a couple of weeks ago and she looked like an ancient toad! I didn’t even recognize her. What happened? She must have had some sort of illness. She looks absolutely horrible.


54 posted on 08/29/2010 12:10:17 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ( VIVA la SB 1070!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux

The “search for a liberal Palin” will work as well as their “coffee party” idea did. Either it’s grassroots or it isn’t.


55 posted on 08/29/2010 12:10:21 PM PDT by denydenydeny (You're not only wrong. You're wrong at the top of your voice. --Spencer Tracy, Bad Day at Black Rock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

LOL! Ain’t that the truth? He’s one that will even cause me to break my neck to change the channel whenever I see his face. He’s gotta be the worst. He never even listens to what the discussion is about, he just starts in with his talking points. Annoying as hell.


56 posted on 08/29/2010 12:12:31 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ( VIVA la SB 1070!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr

I can tolerate Snakehead Carville but Henican rubs me the wrong way.


57 posted on 08/29/2010 12:18:03 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux
They have one. Anyone ever heard of Rachel Maddow?
58 posted on 08/29/2010 12:26:39 PM PDT by HenpeckedCon (What pi$$es me off the most is that POS commie will get a State Funeral!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux; All
There is only One Sarah Palin.

She is a power given her by the Creator.

Be glad for her effect and excellent communication skills.

59 posted on 08/29/2010 12:28:21 PM PDT by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux

LOL but they have Pelosi...


60 posted on 08/29/2010 12:28:47 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson