He needs to exercise a little more self discipline where his emotions are concerned.
You’re wrong newbie. Coulter speaking at Homocon lends them legitimacy. She has already said she’s the “Judy Garland of the Right”. That’s not disagreeing with them. That gives them legitimacy.
If she knew that this was going to be the consequence prior to speaking then she got what she asked for. If not, I totally agree with you. If she inspires a few people with her speech then it is worth it and Farah should lighten up.
But in this case Coulter isn’t going to give just “give a speech”, she is in fact the “keynote speaker”.
That will be used in an attempt to bestow legitimacy.
rubbish, this group is all about the homosexual agenda, they are the old log cabins and have since changed their name once they were busted for being Dems pretending to be republicans.
Homosexuals need to be told that they are in need for mental halp and that conservatives do not stand with their agenda
I agree with WND on this.
Coulter speaking at a pro-homosexual rally, only shows that she lacks the conviction of her morals, or that she’s too flexible in them. It takes away from the whole point of what she’s trying to say.
IOW, if she agrees to speak in many places where she doesn’t agree with her hosts (and their agenda), IMO, she therefore becomes a sell-out, and in essence, loses credibility (with me anyway).
I wonder if Ann will do her John Edwards “faggot” joke again.
You are not wrong. However, it is way too much to call Farrah’s actions “intolerant.”
I am sick of PC nonsense being applied by our own side to our own disagreements and divergent points of views.
you are only correct if the goal is to make as much filthy lucre as possible.
Do you recall the phrase - Love of money is the root of all evil?!?!
No, Farah is right and smarter than you are.
If she as asked to speak before the Ku Klux Klan, bringing Jimmy Walker as her date, about illegal immigration, would you being making the same point? No, you wouldn't.
Speaking before this faux conservative group and giving it legitimacy is no different than giving the KKK legitimacy. And, that is what the issue is, giving a faux conservative group legitimacy within the conservative movement, not speaking before a group one disagrees with to change their minds and hearts.
It will be interesting to see if Coulter criticizes their agenda, which is, as they unashamedly admit, “all gay”.