Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Palin is starting to reveal "Who" were behind the false lawsuits & "How" they did it? Yes!
Palin Legal Defense Fund ^ | Saturday June 26, 2010

Posted on 06/26/2010 2:08:01 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

Here is what Sarah said last year:

"Political operatives descended on Alaska last August, digging for dirt.The ethics law I championed became their weapon of choice. Over the past nine months I've been accused of all sorts of frivolous ethics violations - such as holding a fish in a photograph, wearing a jacket with a logo on it, and answering reporters' questions. - July 3 2009 SARAH PALIN


Now looking at her "NEW" Legal Defense Fund - I notice something, this from her people saying that the MSM is ignoring the truth, that in part they DON'T want you to know is that:

* The National Democratic Committee used its Alaska chapter, the Alaska Democratic Party (ADP), to create a website with one stated goal: "Keep Sarah Palin Out of Public Office." To this day, the Democrats use this website to publicly seek donations for funding bogus "legal challenges involving issues related to Sarah Palin."

* The ADP's "Keep Sarah Palin Out of Public Office" campaign used our own legal system to sponsor more than two dozen ethics complaints against Governor Palin. Out of the 27 complaints, 26 were dismissed!

* The so-called "independent counsel" who started this investigation was an attorney from President Barack Obama's law firm.

So Basically, the DNC used the Alaska Democrat Party to collect donations to "fund" frivolous lawsuits and ethics complaints against Sarah Palin to harass and bankrupt her personally, financially, and publicly - They were most likely paying or at least supporting these "so called concerned citizens" to file one lawsuit after another

Remember that Time Magazine reporter who was there the week after Sarah announce her resignation said that word was reached to him that people from D.C told the Alaska Democrats to quote "STOP WORKING WITH PALIN"

When Thomas Van Flein, Sarah Palin's lawyer, Meg Stapleton, spokesperson for the Governor and a friend were on Larry King Live two days after Sarah announce that she was stepping down - The Question was asked: who do you think was behind all of this? they said Rahm Emmanuel.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: democrats; dnc; obama; palin; personaldestruction; rats; romney; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: CondoleezzaProtege
Romney's re-run.

Ain't he simply a RE-tread?

What scares me most about Romney is my paranoia that the ticket THEY will seek to purchase is: Whitman/Romney~2012 -- two big fat cats with dough, one a billionaire, the other a millionaire, and both want to be The Prez.

Just sickening.

61 posted on 06/26/2010 7:26:28 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

oh yeah those people who started the false rumors about Palin “not knowing Africa was a continent” and the $100,000 wardrobe bill nonsense about her family acting like “hillbillies in the city” on the campaign trail spending massive amounts of money everywhere —> those were ALL MCCAIN people who are CURRENTLY helping MEG Whitman in her California campaign BEFORE they go onto help Romney for 2012.


62 posted on 06/26/2010 7:29:08 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
I believe that Meg Whitman is planning to run for president in 2012.

Meg Whitman has BILLIONS of dollars.

One can hire tens of thousands of agent provocateurs with that kind of money.

Seriously.

Meg Whitman plans to become POTUS in 2012. Romney? He'll be her campaign manager, and she might select him for her VP.

63 posted on 06/26/2010 7:37:50 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Alinsky Inc.

64 posted on 06/26/2010 7:45:30 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
Thanks hennie pennie.
The National Democratic Committee used its Alaska chapter, the Alaska Democratic Party (ADP), to create a website with one stated goal: "Keep Sarah Palin Out of Public Office." To this day, the Democrats use this website to publicly seek donations for funding bogus "legal challenges involving issues related to Sarah Palin." * The ADP's "Keep Sarah Palin Out of Public Office" campaign used our own legal system to sponsor more than two dozen ethics complaints against Governor Palin. Out of the 27 complaints, 26 were dismissed! * The so-called "independent counsel" who started this investigation was an attorney from President Barack Obama's law firm.
Apropos of nothing, I was just a minute ago rereading the Second Amendment....
65 posted on 06/26/2010 7:45:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
>>>> "....those were ALL MCCAIN people who are CURRENTLY helping MEG Whitman in her California campaign BEFORE they go onto help Romney for 2012." <<<<

It was my distinct impression that they were not "McCain Peeps" ---- they were ROMNEY-bots, and when his campaign folded, Meg Whitman took the lot of them over to McCain -- who said "Meg is WISE," LOLOLOL, and their SOLE INTENTION was to sabotage McCain's campaign, in whatever way they could.

They wanted Romney to be the Prez, and Meg was supposed to be selected by Mittens for VP.

They wanted to make sure that McCain would NOT win, so that they could do Romney/Whitman in 2012, AGAINST BHO, they couldn't do that against a President McCain.

Meantime, I think that Mega Whitman has belatedly realized that America isn't going to elect Romney, so now she's planning on Whitman/Romney~2012

66 posted on 06/26/2010 7:47:12 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
NOT that I particularly understand the technicalities of the Law.

Neither do these people. Not that it matters anymore.

67 posted on 06/26/2010 7:54:00 PM PDT by bigheadfred (I said free association. Not freely associate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Eewwwwwww! All bad.


68 posted on 06/26/2010 7:57:51 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Apropos of nothing, The so-called "independent counsel" who started this investigation was an attorney from President Barack Obama's law firm.....

Why does this remind me of "How to Catch a Polar bear"?

69 posted on 06/26/2010 8:02:04 PM PDT by bigheadfred (I said free association. Not freely associate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: bigheadfred

;’)


71 posted on 06/26/2010 8:34:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
"The Question was asked: who do you think was behind all of this? they said Rahm Emmanuel."

What'll you bet ol' Hollis French has Rhambo's private cell number in his Blackberry "Favorites" file?

72 posted on 06/26/2010 9:06:34 PM PDT by redhead (BP Gulf Blowout Debacle: Obama's CHERNOBYL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

no no, once Romney’s campaign folded and they all headed to McCain: the intent was to have Romney be McCain’s VICE PRESIDENTIAL candidate...that’s why Whitman and all of them were so upset and snide about Palin. It wasn’t until after Palin was chosen that many of the campaign insiders didn’t care if McCain lost.


73 posted on 06/26/2010 9:25:12 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
WHITMAN believed that he was going to choose HER.

Seriously!

Don't you remember that Meg Whitman was rumored to be McCain's selection?

74 posted on 06/26/2010 9:51:36 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
Probably so. But whether it was planned from the beginning to sabotage the McCain campaign (as though McStain couldn't handle that himself) or that approach was adopted after Palin came on board, it was still loathsome, self-serving treason either way.

Don't get me wrong. If it comes to it, I'll vote for Romney over Obama in a nanosecond. I'll vote for ANYONE the Republican party could conceivably nominate over Obama. But I won't trust Romney, or any of his close confidants, ever.

75 posted on 06/26/2010 10:05:22 PM PDT by Stultis (Democrats. Still devoted to the three S's: Slavery, Segregation and Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

no no she didn’t believe he was going to choose her, that’s why she was so snide when asked to respond about McCain’s “choice” when it was made.


76 posted on 06/26/2010 10:51:02 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
no no she didn’t believe he was going to choose her, that’s why she was so snide when asked to respond about McCain’s “choice” when it was made.

"choose her" meaning choose Palin. Up until the end, I think you're right Whitman was as much a viable possibility as Romney, so even they were shocked. McCain obviously did a great job in keeping it secret...

77 posted on 06/26/2010 11:02:59 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
When Meg & Mittens went to work for McCain, there was a huge "whispering campaign" that McCain was going to be "bold" and pick a woman for the VP slot -- and this had NOTHING to do with Governor Palin, and EVERYTHING to do with, "Is John McCain going to pick Carly Fiorina or Meg Whitman to be VP?" There were DOZENS upon DOZENS upon DOZENS of references to "What will a Meg Whitman vice presidency mean? on television 24/7 in the last 10 days before he named Sarah Palin.

Meg WANTED to be VP.

And Meg WANTS to be president.

78 posted on 06/26/2010 11:14:32 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
Nope, I won't vote for Romney for anything, and I'd never ever ever ever vote for Meg Whitman.

Seriously..... I have been wondering if John McCain has FINALLY, doh!, figured out that Meg Whitman & Mittens Romney intentionally sabotaged his campaign and sought to ruin Governor Palin.

I have NO idea why this is difficult to understand.

If McCain/Palin had won, there is NO way that either Whitman/Romney OR Romney/Whitman would be able to run for prez before 2016.

By ensuring that McCain lost, now they plan to run for Prez/VP against Obama in 2012. They couldn't possibly have run against President McCain in 2012, NOR against VP Sarah Palin in 2016.

They HAD to make sure that McCain LOST, that Obama won.

I'm curious if John McCain has FINALLY seen this obvious fatal flaw of his *S*T*U*P*I*D* campaign --- staffed by people who wanted desperately for him to LOSE. I mean... how *D*U*M*B* can you be to fill all the staff positions with people who want you to LOSE?????

Anyway, I am VERY curious whether he & Governor Palin have discussed this?????

I have wondered whether he FINALLY figured it out and has had discussions with her about it? He sure wasn't standing up for her when it was OBVIOUS that any normal rational thinking human being would stand up for a running mate.

79 posted on 06/26/2010 11:26:03 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
I will NEVER. EVER. vote for Mitt Romney. EVER!

I have wondered whether he FINALLY figured it out and has had discussions with her about it? He sure wasn't standing up for her when it was OBVIOUS that any normal rational thinking human being would stand up for a running mate.

McCain simply became intimidated by her and couldn't foresee the force of nature she truly would be and become.

Honestly I doubt they have discussed anything about the campaign since the campaign...They remain on cordial yet distant terms I would imagine.

80 posted on 06/26/2010 11:51:25 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson