Posted on 06/24/2010 8:07:16 PM PDT by USALiberty
Mr. Dasey, you tell me how Barack Obama, the putative president and so-called “Commander-in-Chief,” was able to legally and ethically secure the resignation of a four-star general and American hero, Stanley McChrystal! Obama has no legal or moral authority to do any such thing! Barack Obama (assuming that’s his real name) is not, as our Constitution defines it and requires, a “natural born citizen”! I don’t care if he looks “black” (he’s mostly Arabic in ethnicity, and he has admitted to being a Muslim as opposed to Christian).
I don’t care if the people elected him “President,” as it was by fraud. He never possessed the qualifications to run for office in the first place, yet he lied and claimed that he did. That alone makes him guilty of high crimes, including treason. I don’t care if the man is charismatic; so were Adolf Hitler and Jim Jones! I don’t care if there’s a conspiracy of “heavyweights” like George Soros, Rupert Murdoch, Michael Moore, the Clintons, John McCain and Sarah Palin, O’Reilly, Beck and others to keep him in office. I don’t care if he has numerous social security numbers while most of us ordinary folks are restricted to having only one. I don’t care if he, Obama, knows who I am, because I am just an ordinary everyday American citizen.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
General McChrystal demonstrated military discipline and deference to the office when he tendered his resignation to the Commander-in-Chief.
Because the general is a libtard pu*s, the Joint Cheifs are filled with libs or cowards like the CIA and Pentagon plus SCOTUS. The judicary and legislative branches are totally corrupt. Prepare for islamification too.
Most Americans are idiots who watch TV which empowers the Saudi agent. TV is 100% behind him.
How? By being elected President. The only way.
Ping!
bump
How much time do you have in Ranger Battalion?
Yah right.
If McChrystal had any balls whatsoever, his first allegiance is to uphold & defend the Constitution of the United States, from all enemies both foreign & domestic. His allegiance is NOT to the Commander in Chief, or in 0b0z0's case, the Usurper-in-Crap. McChrystal should have demanded that 0b0z0 prove by what right, that he could fire or demand McChrystal's resignation, and force a Constitutional crisis RIGHT THEN & THERE to force 0b0z0 to prove his constitutional eligibility as president. McChrystal is a stinkin' RAT bastard socialist demoRAT liberal whose real allegiance will always be to the leftist agenda & ideology.
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
McChrystal exhibited poor judgement when he voted for the usurper...so his secondary screw-up doesn’t surprise me.
Don’t hold back. Tell us how you really feel.
Letter is from “Tom Arnold”?
I keep seeing this claim, but I've seen his daddy, and he's as negroid as any other African.
Where's the alleged Arab in the woodpile?
How much time does he, the JCOS, CIA, DIA, NSA, SCOTUS have covering for the usurper? Almost 2 years?
I have more respect for LTC Lakin but those who were butt kissers to the brass and who loved the PX for cheap smokes and booze think Lakin should be court martialed.
In all the pictures I’ve seen of McChrystal, he’s wearing 3 stars.
If he had an IQ above 4 he would never have voted for the Saudi agent. He knows that Riyad aka the King wants his employee in the white hut to get lots of american troops killed with pro-muslim rules of engagement.
Iraq and Afghan now are all about getting american troops killed and humiliating the US military.
McChrystal VOTED for that.
The govt now is filled with Muslim Brotherhood moles [robably sending intel back to the Taliban and Al Queada to kill our troops.
McChrystal VOTED for that. F-— him.
But just to reiterate, McChrystal is a socialist RAT bastard liberal demoRAT through & through. He had a golden opportunity to force disclosure of 0b0z0's illegitimate, illegal, unconstitutional election as pres___ent of the U.S. And he did nothing. McChrystal is a coward & traitor along with 0b0z0, the commie pig, usurper-in-crap. If Petraeus had any balls he would likewise decline the "offer" and explain to the American people why he was not taking the assignment. I think 90% of the generals & admirals currently on active duty are dyed-in-the-wool socialist RAT bastard liberal demoRATS.
If the general wanted the job he wouldn’t have given the magazine interview. He got what he wanted: out of a losing command.
Ever notice in the past 2 decades that when those with the least qualifications and most suspicion of criminal behavior are liberals in office, those closest to institutions of clandestine intelligence and operations with power to confirm and act are removed from authority?
One of the first things military operational officers learn is to never trust what you read in the press.
I found the Rolling Stone article interesting in that it praised Hillary, asserted the General voted for Obama, then brandished nonprofessional quips attributed to his aides.
I really don’t know how anybody would know who the General voted for in a sealed ballot, even if he claimed to vote for somebody, let alone report it as fact.
I don’t know why an article would praise Hillary in that relationship, unless to damage the General’s military reputation and image of righteousness or just discernment amongst his peers and juniors or perhaps simple lip service.
For the rest of the article it appeared to well document the General’s devotion to duty to a chain of command which might have provided considerably more support.
IMHO, from reviewing his bio and timeline, he was probably selected and groomed for this type of position for decades and did not in any shape, form, or fashion receive it based upon competitive excellence, but that is simply the evidence, not a judgment of authority.
IMHO, none involved in the situation have manifest any virtue in their discernment or actions, but they have been authoritatively active in a worldly manner.
I’m left with the impression that two seasoned, groomed professional senior flag ranked officers have held the same position, and have received more adversarial support from the political authority, than any friendly active support in the accomplishment of a visceral mission.
Those who repetitively blame their juniors, rarely if ever respect their seniors.
The removal IMHO paints Obama more as a loser than a winner, but I don’t know why the action occurred, because the obvious events being reported are too easily contrived in either direction for the political maneuvering of others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.