1 posted on
06/04/2010 8:12:01 AM PDT by
bs9021
To: bs9021
If it took this long for Harvard to realize that Keynesianism is bad economic model then it really says something as to the general cluelessness of Harvard’s economics department.
2 posted on
06/04/2010 8:15:04 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: bs9021
Today in the US however, we have Kenyanesianism instead of Keynesianism
3 posted on
06/04/2010 8:16:41 AM PDT by
Roccus
(......and then there were none.)
To: bs9021
Look at GE, when their Government Dollars are yanked, the Company is going to collapse.
4 posted on
06/04/2010 8:18:35 AM PDT by
dila813
To: bs9021
Keynesianism Questioned by Harvard Researchers Keynesianism has failed every time it has been tried.
5 posted on
06/04/2010 8:19:09 AM PDT by
Uri’el-2012
(Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
To: bs9021
The three Harvard Business School (HBS) researchers... I wonder is these are now former Harvard Business School (HBS) researchers?
6 posted on
06/04/2010 8:26:42 AM PDT by
libertylover
(The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
To: bs9021
Von Mises:
Governments BLOW BUBBLES that appear to be stimulus until they collapse under lesser demand. The private market provides the only real stimulus because it is based on a sustainable profit motive.
7 posted on
06/04/2010 8:28:12 AM PDT by
struggle
((The struggle continues))
To: bs9021
Why did they choose ONE SOUTHERN Senator who changed from Being a Democrat to being a Republican????
8 posted on
06/04/2010 8:29:17 AM PDT by
Paige
("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
To: bs9021
Finally, something that makes sense gets credit!
9 posted on
06/04/2010 8:34:17 AM PDT by
quintr
To: bs9021
Keynesianism has never worked, not once, anywhere.
Keynesianism is an intellectually corrupt excuse for politicians to do what they always want to do: Spend More.
11 posted on
06/04/2010 9:35:43 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(0bummer calls opponents "Teabaggers". So we can call Kagan "Carpet Muncher." Right?)
To: bs9021
Our findings suggest that they should revisit their belief that federal spending can stimulate private economic development, he said in the interview. In fact, their study showed that companies retrench in the face of earmarked federal dollars. This conclusion was unexpected, asserted Prof. Coval in the interview. Our original goal was to investigate how politically connected firms benefit from increases in the power of their representatives, he claimed (emphasis added).
Liberal statists don't care if Keynesianism actually works or not. All they are looking for is an excuse to increase the size and power of government.
12 posted on
06/04/2010 9:41:23 AM PDT by
mjp
(pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, independence, limited government, capitalism})
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson