You said that. I responded that if the school had a warrant then it wouldn't be the school spying. I guess I should have said it would be police.
You asked me what warrant? Only two posts on this entire thread mentioned the need for a warrant. One was mine in post 74.
Your post to me 154 I took to imply that I approved of the schools spying and I asked you where I had appoved? We agree that I never approved.
Your post 160 says the issue of a warrant is a moot point. I don't see the matter of a 4th Amendment violation as a moot point. Here we disagee. While teachers often serve as a form of proxy law enforcement at schools...they cannot do that with webcams on school laptops taken into a private home.
The issue is the SCHOOL spying NOT the police getting a warrant. That is why a warrant is a moot point. The school can’t get a warrant for what they did illegally so there is no reason to bring up getting a warrant in this thread. If the police did the spying without a warrant then there would be a need to bring up that they should have gotten warrant. I am really tired of going around in circles with this. Yes I care about the Constitution and the Constitution doesn’t allow this behaviour by the school EVER and THAT is the point.