The issue is the SCHOOL spying NOT the police getting a warrant. That is why a warrant is a moot point. The school can’t get a warrant for what they did illegally so there is no reason to bring up getting a warrant in this thread. If the police did the spying without a warrant then there would be a need to bring up that they should have gotten warrant. I am really tired of going around in circles with this. Yes I care about the Constitution and the Constitution doesn’t allow this behaviour by the school EVER and THAT is the point.
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a person is guilty of a felony of the third degree if he:
(1) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, electronic or oral communication;
(2) intentionally discloses or endeavors to disclose to any other person the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication, or evidence derived therefrom, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, electronic or oral communication; or
(3) intentionally uses or endeavors to use the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication, or evidence derived therefrom, knowing or having reason to know, that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, electronic or oral communication.