Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beck and Birthers
Western Journalism ^ | 2-3-10 | by Doug Edelman

Posted on 02/03/2010 4:12:18 PM PST by washingtoncon

Editors note: Doug Edelman argues that while the eligibility question is valid and needs to be resolved, we should shelve the issue until after the 2010 mid-term elections. He believes that the issue could distract conservative from the important job of winning elections. What do you think? Leave a comment.

Glenn Beck spent considerable airtime on his January 4, 2010 radio program dismissing and ridiculing the “Birthers” and the idea that President Obama was born in Kenya. Of course this raised immediate ire amongst those who question Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve in the office of President of the United States. Before a war erupts on the Right between the Constitutional Eligibility Challengers and their deriders, BOTH sides need to step back! The eligibility issue is a distraction, and as Beck RIGHTLY points out – could serve to advance Obama’s interests – at least at this point in time! The focus needs to be on Obama’s policies. ObamaCare can still be rammed down our throats. We must put ALL our energies into convincing our elected officials that NOTHING that comes out of Conference Committee can be acceptable and WHATEVER emerges must be voted down. Focusing on “Where’s the Birth Certificate” right now will simply waste energy and resources that we need for the healthcare fight – and failing in that arena will permanently damage our Republic. PRIORITIES, PEOPLE!

(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: article2section1; barackobama; beck; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; citizen; citizenship; eligibility; glennbeck; ineligible; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: cripplecreek

He never wanted anything to do with it from the beginning so I don’t think it’s a question of being sick of it.

As I mentioned in reply#40, I genuinely believe that he is under orders not to discuss it.

No one who enjoys reading and study as much as Beck does could conclude that the eligibility issue is nuts. And since when has Beck ever cared about appearing “crazy?”

No, the powers that be don’t want him on the subject. They’ve given him free rein to hammer away at what Obama “does” but they don’t want him going anywhere near what Obama “is.” Or “isn’t,” for that matter.

BTW, CC...you are a bright person and a proud conservative so why do you insist on using that God-awful DU smear word to describe yourself?


41 posted on 02/03/2010 6:43:08 PM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

The word has no power over me. Its really that simple.

I’ve been a border control supporter for far too long to be sensitive to little words.


42 posted on 02/03/2010 6:55:01 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Jeez, do you folks even think this stuff through?

Yeah, let's put all eggs in one basket.

Let's use just one tactic and forget the rest.

Let's not have a Plan A, Plan B, Plan C.

Let's just scrap defending the Constitution, right?

Why should there not be multiple attacks from multiple points?

Jeez, do you folks NOT even think this stuff through?

43 posted on 02/03/2010 6:55:56 PM PST by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pissant

” They keep telling us that there are more important issues to deal with , now were have we heard that line before ? “ ... ohh yeah, the liberals keep telling us that...


44 posted on 02/03/2010 7:44:57 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: washingtoncon

There are many Benedict Arnolds in the anti-birther, after birther movement...


45 posted on 02/03/2010 7:47:20 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

The Benedict Arnolds are trying to split the birther movement.


46 posted on 02/03/2010 7:50:34 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mel
" I love Beck, but just can’t agree with him on this point. Beck is always preaching go back to the founding documents and this is one thing about eligibility that is the founding documents. "

The very thing he is railing about and preaching about, but, yet, one of those things is right under his nose in plain view and won't address it, and in fact ridicules those who do.
47 posted on 02/03/2010 7:57:06 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: washingtoncon

Make a BIG donation to Free Republic and we may discuss some “moderation” on the issue in question.


48 posted on 02/03/2010 8:02:44 PM PST by Eye of Unk (The Seven-headed Beast of Revelation 12, 13, and 17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It bothers me to allow my enemies to define me and to determine what I should be called. The left’s determining the rules of the politcal game has gone on way too long.

Moreover, conservatives using the left’s slurs must cause as much mirth among the Kos crowd as rappers using the N-word surely provokes amusement for the KKK.


49 posted on 02/03/2010 8:12:56 PM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: washingtoncon

BS! I’ve been hearing for more than 30 years that the important, strident issues that could advance Constitutional governance (like fundamental tax reform) must take a back seat to the coming election cycle. (”You have to get me reelected so I can keep up the good fight!”)

The Constitution is more important than anyone’s election or reelection. There isn’t a soul in office now (except Al Fraken) who could not have supported the Constitution before the election and PREVENTED a Marxist usurper from taking the Oval Office.

SOMEBODY in DC needs put on their Big Boy pants and stand up for the Constitution NOW. It would all be over in one month. Then, AFTER we have a legitimate POTUS, we can reward those who upheld their oath of office.


50 posted on 02/03/2010 8:21:08 PM PST by TexasVoter (No Constituion - No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: washingtoncon; Man50D; rxsid; American Constitutionalist; Seizethecarp
Doug Edelman argues that while the eligibility question is valid and needs to be resolved, we should shelve the issue until after the 2010 mid-term elections

Screw him. Strunk just joined Orly's QW cases in DC. Kreep is appealing a case against the CA attorney for failing to vet Obama on CA ballot. Apuzzo has a QW on appeal in 3rd circuit court of appeals. Donofrio is about to file QW on behalf of the Chrysler dealers. Then, we have the American Grand Jury filing for the American people to Congress and various Federal judges.

I am disappointed in Beck and O'Reilly. Maybe the up and coming Megyn Kelly will break the biggest story of the 21st century.

51 posted on 02/04/2010 4:47:40 AM PST by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mel
I love Beck, but just can’t agree with him on this point. Beck is always preaching go back to the founding documents and this is one thing about eligibility that is the founding documents.

Yep -- Beck's hypocrisy on this issue makes him the very idiot he argues with.

52 posted on 02/04/2010 5:55:28 AM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

It will be fun to watch them jumping on the band wagon when this thing reveals that the birthers are right..


53 posted on 02/04/2010 10:17:14 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
You got that right. The truth will come out in our court system soon.

Scott Brown stopped Obama-Reid-Pelosi cold in one election. The whole Country is energized and ready to take back America.

Do you remember Howard Cosell? "Down goes Frazier. Down goes Frazier. Down goes Frazier." Well, that's what I'm hearing in my head only it's "Down goes Obama!"

54 posted on 02/04/2010 8:25:50 PM PST by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson