Posted on 01/28/2010 5:18:04 AM PST by iloveamerica1980
BHO'S KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE ! ! SEE FOR YOURSELF ! ! Right before my eyes, there it is, Barack HUSSEIN Obama's birth certificate, mmm mmmm mmmm
Can you point to the word "non-binding" in that SR511 resolution for us all???
Yep — occasionally some of us have to do our duty as emissaries to an alien planet to see if there is any rational life there. But you are right. In Obamalala Land there is no sign of rational life — only mindless space-brained lower life forms wearing bunched up panties.
Explaining it will require an understanding of how government works, which is problematic in your case. But I'll try.
A non-binding resolution is a written motion that is passed by one or the other houses of Congress that cannot be written into law. And the reason it cannot be is that it is not sent to the other house of Congress for approval and not sent to the President to be signed. For a law to take effect, as you should know, the Constitution requires both houses and the president to approve. SR 511 was never sent to the president. It never made it out of the Senate. It was never meant to.
So the evidence that is is a non-binding resolution is what happened to it. It was voted on in the Senate alone and stayed there. It is meaningless in terms of law. It has no purpose other than to express the thoughts of the Senate, such as they are. It no more defines what constitutes natural-born citizenship in terms of law than one of your posts or my posts does. It is, in the grand, cosmic scheme of things, meaningless. Except, apparently, to you.
Questions?
Not according to law.
I'm sorry but I read your excuse but did not see where you pointed to the word "non-binding" in that Senate Resolution SR511.
Did you forget the question or were you just unsuccessful as always??? Perhaps you have it confused with NBSR511.
Is that the non-binding law of Obamalala Land???
It's not in there. Now, can you tell us when the House of Representatives voted on SR 511 or when the president signed it into law?
Please tell us (with specific names) who are behind the "independent"(?) of YOUR sources from third parties such as "ohforgoodnesssake"!!!
Would that eventually be YOU or GREAT KIM also???
It is just such an "edifying" source you are getting your evidence from, ROTLMSO.
I have only briefly seen the "copy" of the Kenyan B.C. which is kind of smudge on my screen!
However I faintly see on top that the signature is spelled Helton. Was that a 2009 signature or a 1961 signature?
Was Maganga CA in 1961??
Now as a ships Administrator in the Merchant Marine, it is supposed that the Captain signs all documents, however, because his other busy duties I would mostly sign the documents on his behalf. Has it occurred to you that maybe Maganga had some aid signing it on his behalf, and it is certainly easy for someone to sign with an "o" instead of an "a" and how was his name pronounced phonetically???
Have you personally ever been in Africa and dealt with the authorities there????
How in the world do you even find such claptrap?
Right.
Now, can you tell us when the House of Representatives voted on SR 511 or when the president signed it into law?
It's not law. It's a Resolution in which the Senate unanimously accepted the traditional historical definition of "natural born citizen" as that defined by Vattel and the Venus Case as birth to American citizen parents [plural] and on American soil.
That's why they couldn't do one for Obama -- he's not a natural born citizen according to the traditional historical definition -- and they and you know it.
“born of American parents”
is refered to children (plural)
plurality of children, plurality of parents
the universe of children, the univers of parents
otherwise it would have been written
“born of two American parents”
no, independent means not related to me in any way.
the document is stamped feb 19th 2009. Lucas affirms maganga signed Helton Maganga below his stamp listing Helton Maganga, Chief Administrator of CPGH, on thata day. Only, I have found:
His name is Heltan
He was not yet appointed CA on Feb 19th 2009, articles in the Kenya paper “The Nation” from before and after Feb 19th - march (2) and april (1) 2009 say that the Chief Administrator was Othigo jenifer. The same paper writes an articke in June win which Maganga is named as CA for the first time. In the same month a video is shown on Kenya TV interviewing CA MAganga and it is subtitled Heltan Maganga. No reference to CA Othigo are known from after April 2009.
So I believe that Maganga was appointed CA sometimes between April and June 2009. Lucas conceived his hoax in June and ran across the article with CA Maganga making his the signing CA for his Feb 19th document.
Sources to these infos are linked in previous posts.
It's a non-binding resolution where the Senate chose to identify one manner of becoming a natural-born citizen. But as you also said, it is not law. It has no legal authority. It is opinion, and nothing else. So the Senate could just as easily pass a resolution saying Obama is a natural-born citizen because he was born in Hawaii and what would that prove? Would it settle the issue? Only to people like you who seem to think non-binding resolutions count for something.
That's why they couldn't do one for Obama...
Sure they could.
The Senate's propensity for prefabrication.
Please don't start you usually tap-dancing!!!
But it would be every bit as binding as your SR 511.
I think you are out on very thin ice!
The stamp clearly spells Helton Maganga and CA, but has no date on it!!
So you BELIEVE...(???) that Maganga was appointed CA between April - June 2009, hmmmm!!!
Can you prove to us that he was not appointed on January 1st 2009???
Just remember that you are in insane La-La-Land. ‘Nuf said. Feeding is not recommended!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.